The Japanese economic model created strong domestic : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Feb 2017, 06:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The Japanese economic model created strong domestic

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 303
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 274 [0], given: 9

The Japanese economic model created strong domestic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2009, 19:20
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

69% (02:24) correct 31% (48:06) wrong based on 166 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through subsidies from its Ministry of Trade and by closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market. This strategy promised to help economic growth by incubating domestic industries. New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers. The program could reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade.
Which of the following, based on the passage above, is a weakness in this economic strategy?

A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.

B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.

C) Subsidies and import constraints keep domestic prices high and impose a burden on consumers.

D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.

E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 435
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 16

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2009, 21:07
I am not sure, whether it is right GMAT question, because it looks like you need to know some economics in order to answer question.
IMO C.
_________________

Never give up,,,

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 303
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 274 [0], given: 9

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2009, 21:52
mirzohidjon wrote:
I am not sure, whether it is right GMAT question, because it looks like you need to know some economics in order to answer question.
IMO C.

Got it from an old practice test, not official GMAT. So 'agree with you that to infer C as a weakness in the strategy is not direct from the passage (economics background will help)...

Close foreign competition=>known local demand and protection by barriers=>reduce imports and INCREASE TRADE BALANCE. Nowhere there is any mention about burden on consumer/increased goods prices etc.

So we have to infer from the available choices. E and D can be ruled out. B doesn't seem to have any direct relation either.
I chose A because at least it talks about the possibility that TRADE BALANCE may get impacted if other nations stop importing from Japan... but the correct answer is C

Thanks for ur inputs.
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 10

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2009, 23:51
its C.
Rest all don't even budge the conclusion.
In closed economy,as there is no competition,the CPI can be totally governed by the manufacturers.Hence consumers are at the mercy of these people.

Thank you
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

SVP
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1637
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Followers: 99

Kudos [?]: 637 [0], given: 432

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2009, 16:29
I feel that the answer is C as well, for reasons already mentioned.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 225
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 1

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2009, 21:48
IMO the answer is E

A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.
-Out of scope

B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.
-Out of scope

C) Subsidies and import constraints keep domestic prices high and impose a burden on consumers.
-Out of scope

D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.
-Out of scope

E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.
- By not knowing the demand for the products, incubated industries would either under produce or over produce the product. This situation could effect the imports. Hence this should be the correct answer
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2009
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2009, 04:13
IMO C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 435
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 16

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 14:01
It is C, i do not get it, why you think that it is impossible to know the demand for incubated industries?
_________________

Never give up,,,

Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 241
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Nov 2009, 17:53
A) is reasonable but not in the scope.
B) it is not clear how millionaires will be created from the question.
C) is correct because the ministry gives subsidies and imposes tariffs to promote local industry but imposes burden on local consumers; hence, as an economic strategy not good.
D) not talk of quotas in the question.
E)the demand would be known clearly because it is the local market which is fixed.
_________________

-----------------------
tusharvk

Manager
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 66
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 5

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2009, 14:50
mirzohidjon wrote:
It is C, i do not get it, why you think that it is impossible to know the demand for incubated industries?

I feel that E is correct.
One of the premises is that the manufactures would be able to sell the products with known demand, but E challenges this premise, which weakens it.

Am I missing something here?
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 175
Location: Streamwood IL
Schools: Kellogg(Evening),Booth (Evening)
WE 1: 5 Years
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 3

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2009, 16:56
Will go with C.
_________________

Rock On

Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2010, 02:31
E is my answer.

We could interprete the stem in another way:: the argument is flawed on which of following reasons?

Consider C and E:
- C: burden on consumers probably curbs the domestic goods consumption, but what will happen if the tariff and other barriers make import goods even more expensive? --> import is still at low level, balance of trade is still sound.

- E: this is the weakness of argument
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 171
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 1

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2010, 05:54
C . But not a CR question for GMAT May be from a RC
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 762 [0], given: 36

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2010, 19:32
Indeed C
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 224
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 3

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2010, 12:33
A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.
-- It might create or might not create and plus it not connected to the Japanese economy. Hence A is not a correct answer choice.

B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.
-- Irrelevant. Hence cannot be a correct answer choice.

C) Subsidies and import constraints keep domestic prices high and impose a burden on consumers.
This is a correct answer choice. Premise states that domestic industries will help grow economy. However if subsidies and import constraints keep the domestic prices higher, eventually lead to increase in prices and destabilize the economy.

D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.
Neutral statement. Hence cannot be a correct answer choice.

E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.
Might be might not be. Hence cannot be a correct answer choice.

Thank You.

Thanks,
Akhil M.Parekh
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 593 [0], given: 6

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2010, 18:04
C it is.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 313
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 539 [0], given: 20

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2010, 00:33
IMO C
Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2010
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 4

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2010, 15:35
gmattokyo wrote:
The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through subsidies from its Ministry of Trade and by closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market. This strategy promised to help economic growth by incubating domestic industries. New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers. The program could reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade.
Which of the following, based on the passage above, is a weakness in this economic strategy?

A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.

B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.

C) Subsidies and import constraints keep domestic prices high and impose a burden on consumers.

D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.

E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.

+1 for C. But as was put by others, the question is not typical GMAT question or the question has to be reworded like..Which of the following if true....would weaken...
Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1426
GPA: 3.77
Followers: 180

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 621

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2010, 00:59
Clearly C.

E is wrong, beacause it is stating that "The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.

Just respond to the following questions:
Does the Goverment (ministry of trade , whatever) is interested in promoting incubated industries? yes, it does, see stimuli (is closing off competitive foreign firms). Agree??
If interested, Will the Gov support promotion campaigns of goods produced by local firms? - of course, logically yes-

Does the Goverment (ministry of trade , whatever) is interested in promoting incubated industries? yes, it does, because it according to smimuli "is closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market." Key words are "competitive and is closing off".
If foreign firms are competitive and if Gov continues to close off acess to local market, will this create market inefficiences which may result in "keep domestic prices high and impose a burden on consumers" - clearly yes.

hien48 wrote:
E is my answer.

We could interprete the stem in another way:: the argument is flawed on which of following reasons?

Consider C and E:
- C: burden on consumers probably curbs the domestic goods consumption, but what will happen if the tariff and other barriers make import goods even more expensive? --> import is still at low level, balance of trade is still sound.

- E: this is the weakness of argument

_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 111
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

Re: Japanese economic model [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2010, 07:54
+1 for C

Cheers,
S
Re: Japanese economic model   [#permalink] 26 Jul 2010, 07:54

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 30 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 RATT RACE: Economic modeling programs used to predict the future trend 9 05 May 2016, 11:56
The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through 1 02 Dec 2014, 09:47
The coming economic recovery will surely be strong. Most of 24 10 Nov 2011, 02:51
1 Supporter / Defender assumption model 1 31 Oct 2009, 09:22
CR-European and Japanese Companies 5 28 Feb 2007, 15:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The Japanese economic model created strong domestic

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.