Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 25 May 2017, 13:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 212
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 731 [1] , given: 974

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2011, 08:38
1
This post received
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

39% (02:20) correct 61% (01:18) wrong based on 535 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

(A) stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting
(B) stashed such money as he received to hide evidence supporting
(C) stashed the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(D) of stashing the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(E) of stashing such money as he received to hide evidence that would be supportive of
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 212
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 731 [0], given: 974

Re: juror stashed the money [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2011, 08:43
Who can explain the OA, i.e. how "for having" can be parallel with "of stashing"?

Thanks beforehand.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 505 [0], given: 193

Re: juror stashed the money [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2011, 12:42
i went for C, D could be best option if it were for stashing
_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 168
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 5

Re: juror stashed the money [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2011, 13:30
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having....and....of stashing

Excused for is the correct idiom I guess, and having and stashing for ||ism?
_________________

12/2010 GMATPrep 1 620 (Q34/V41)
01/2011 GMATPrep 2 640 (Q42/V36)
01/2011 GMATPrep 3 700 (Q47/V39)
02/2011 GMATPrep 4 710 (Q48/V39)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 1 650 (Q46/V32)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 2 680 (Q46/V36)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 3 710 (Q45/V41)

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 208
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 5

Re: juror stashed the money [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2011, 06:20
I still don't get how 'of stashing' is correct
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 577
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 101

Kudos [?]: 580 [1] , given: 80

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2013, 10:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE


_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Apr 2013
Posts: 66
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3
WE: Science (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 26

Reviews Badge
Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2013, 22:52
i hope somebody explains this OA...i dont get it at all
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 18
GPA: 3.21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [1] , given: 8

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2013, 23:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

The question is to test verb tense and parallellism

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror
1.for having purposely provided murder photos to the media
and then
2. stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

clearly not parallel.

As the first list starts with verbing modifier, the second as well should start with verding

So down with options D & E.

(E) of stashing such money as he received to hide evidence that would be supportive of
as he received in past tense. Should be in past perfect.
also supportive of his claim of innosence - unidiomatic.

So ans is D.

Hope it helps.
Kudos pls if it helps :)
Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
MBA Section Director
avatar
G
Status: Back to work...
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 4316
Location: India
City: Pune
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
WE: Business Development (Manufacturing)
Followers: 440

Kudos [?]: 3177 [3] , given: 2300

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2013, 00:39
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
WaterFlowsUp wrote:
Bumping for review and further discussion*.
*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE


feruz77 wrote:
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

(A) stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting
(B) stashed such money as he received to hide evidence supporting
(C) stashed the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(D) of stashing the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(E) of stashing such money as he received to hide evidence that would be supportive of


D is Correct

It is important to know the structure of the sentence.

Main Clause :- (Subject)The judge (Main Verb)told (Direct Object)the jury that..........
Subordinate Clause :- (Subject)he (Verb)had excused (Object)a juror (Compound Predicate)for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

The compound predicate should contains two predicates (Two reasons for which Juror had been excused), that are parallel to each other.

Predicate 1 :- for having purposely provided murder photos to the media (Adjectival Clause - Modifying the object - Juror)
Predicate 2 :-
then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence. :- The verb stashed makes this part an independent clause referring to The Judge and thus is not parallel to Predicate 1. So A is out.

B) INCORRECT - for the same reason cited in Choice A

C) INCORRECT - for the same reason cited in Choice A

D) CORRECT - This choice converts the independent clause in Adjectival Phrase which is parallel to first predicate.

E) INCORRECT - Wordy structures :- such money as, that would be supportive of....

Hope that helps!
_________________

Chances of Getting Admitted After an Interview [Data Crunch]

New GMAT Club Decision Tracker - Real Time Decision Updates

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2013
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 8

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2014, 21:16
Kindly explain the use of "had received" in the OA. What is the past tense with respect to which "had received money" is furthur past?It must be that the juror first showed the photo & then he got the money?

What am I missing??
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 15
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2014, 21:35
Sorry, folks, but this sentence makes absolutely no sense. You may accuse someone of stashing, but you don't excuse them of stashing. ;) Also, what does "hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence" mean? That he would prefer to be found guilty? Wouldn't he instead hide evidence contradicting his claim of innocence????

Who came up with this sentence anyway--Paris Hilton???? No, couldn't be--in that case, it would contain at least 4 or 5 "like"s. ;)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 May 2014
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2014, 10:17
Narenn wrote:
D is Correct

It is important to know the structure of the sentence.

Main Clause :- (Subject)The judge (Main Verb)told (Direct Object)the jury that..........
Subordinate Clause :- (Subject)he (Verb)had excused (Object)a juror (Compound Predicate)for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

The compound predicate should contains two predicates (Two reasons for which Juror had been excused), that are parallel to each other.

Predicate 1 :- for having purposely provided murder photos to the media (Adjectival Clause - Modifying the object - Juror)
Predicate 2 :-
then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence. :- The verb stashed makes this part an independent clause referring to The Judge and thus is not parallel to Predicate 1. So A is out.

B) INCORRECT - for the same reason cited in Choice A

C) INCORRECT - for the same reason cited in Choice A

D) CORRECT - This choice converts the independent clause in Adjectival Phrase which is parallel to first predicate.

E) INCORRECT - Wordy structures :- such money as, that would be supportive of....

Hope that helps!


Sorry, but this still does not make sense to me.

We obviously deal with a parallel structure here, but "excuse so. of sth." is unidiomatic IMO.

Can someone comment on this?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10366
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2017, 06:22
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 123
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 205

CAT Tests
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2017, 00:59
What's parallel to what here, I did not see a satisfying answeer? ' of stashing' is parallel to what?
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Aug 2016
Posts: 51
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 1

CAT Tests
Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2017, 02:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
Just try to read it carefully and realize who does the action of stashing the money refers to!

In A,B and C , stashed refers to judge. Which is wrong. The judge didn't stash the money.

Read 'excused the juror' followed by 'of stashing'.

Excused the juror of stashing.

Excuse someone of something

Sent from my XT1562 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 199
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.56
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 93

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2017, 07:58
Hi sayantanc2k mikemcgarry egmat VeritasPrepKarishma :P

Can you explain to me why in option D (which is supposed to be correct by GMAT Timer) GMAT uses preposition of while the correct idiom is excuse for?

Many thanks!
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee


Last edited by leanhdung on 21 Apr 2017, 02:10, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 201
GPA: 3.31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 32

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2017, 08:51
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

(A) stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting
(B) stashed such money as he received to hide evidence supporting
(C) stashed the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(D) of stashing the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(E) of stashing such money as he received to hide evidence that would be supportive of
_________________

In case you find my posts helpful, give me Kudos. Thank you.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 199
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.56
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 93

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2017, 18:14
Experts, please explain why in option D (which is supposed to be correct by GMAT Timer) GMAT uses preposition of while the correct idiom is excuse for?

Many thanks!
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 756
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: 339 Q170 V169
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 142 [1] , given: 3

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2017, 21:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
leanhdung wrote:
Experts, please explain why in option D (which is supposed to be correct by GMAT Timer) GMAT uses preposition of while the correct idiom is excuse for?

Many thanks!
This is just a bad question. Leave it.
_________________

Profile and Official GMAT score report

Expert Post
Top Contributor
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 484
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Followers: 148

Kudos [?]: 357 [0], given: 185

CAT Tests
Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2017, 07:43
Expert's post
Top Contributor
Sorry folks, this question is deeply, deeply flawed. The parallelism in (D) seems to be saying that the judge "excused a juror of stashing the money..." -- and that makes absolutely zero sense.

I don't know where this one came from, but please don't spend any more time worrying about it.
_________________

www.gmatninja.com + blog

Join us for the verbal experts' live chat every Wednesday, 8 am PST/8:30 pm IST! Details available here.

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and then please be specific about your question for us. Feel free to mention GMATNinja and GMATNinjaTwo in your post.

Rules for posting in verbal forum | How to use search function (before posting questions!)

GMAT Club's ultimate verbal study plan, 2017 edition

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for   [#permalink] 26 Apr 2017, 07:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Though he had had success broadcasting his controversial yavasani 10 28 Jun 2008, 23:51
When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes vscid 4 20 Mar 2008, 01:40
The contest judges were told to give the prize to whomever Beyond700 6 20 Nov 2007, 18:16
Bill Walton continued on playing, even though he had bibi 6 13 Sep 2007, 11:54
Bill Walton continued on playing, even though he had johnycute 2 06 Jun 2007, 08:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.