Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 23:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 212
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 731 [1] , given: 974

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2011, 08:38
1
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

39% (02:20) correct 61% (01:18) wrong based on 535 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

(A) stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting
(B) stashed such money as he received to hide evidence supporting
(C) stashed the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(D) of stashing the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(E) of stashing such money as he received to hide evidence that would be supportive of
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
MBA Section Director
Status: Back to work...
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 4316
Location: India
City: Pune
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 440

Kudos [?]: 3174 [3] , given: 2300

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2013, 00:39
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
WaterFlowsUp wrote:
Bumping for review and further discussion*.
*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

feruz77 wrote:
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

(A) stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting
(B) stashed such money as he received to hide evidence supporting
(C) stashed the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(D) of stashing the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(E) of stashing such money as he received to hide evidence that would be supportive of

D is Correct

It is important to know the structure of the sentence.

Main Clause :- (Subject)The judge (Main Verb)told (Direct Object)the jury that..........
Subordinate Clause :- (Subject)he (Verb)had excused (Object)a juror (Compound Predicate)for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

The compound predicate should contains two predicates (Two reasons for which Juror had been excused), that are parallel to each other.

Predicate 1 :- for having purposely provided murder photos to the media (Adjectival Clause - Modifying the object - Juror)
Predicate 2 :-
then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence. :- The verb stashed makes this part an independent clause referring to The Judge and thus is not parallel to Predicate 1. So A is out.

B) INCORRECT - for the same reason cited in Choice A

C) INCORRECT - for the same reason cited in Choice A

D) CORRECT - This choice converts the independent clause in Adjectival Phrase which is parallel to first predicate.

E) INCORRECT - Wordy structures :- such money as, that would be supportive of....

Hope that helps!
_________________
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 577
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 101

Kudos [?]: 579 [1] , given: 80

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 10:36
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 18
GPA: 3.21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [1] , given: 8

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 23:15
1
KUDOS
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

The question is to test verb tense and parallellism

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror
1.for having purposely provided murder photos to the media
and then
2. stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

clearly not parallel.

As the first list starts with verbing modifier, the second as well should start with verding

So down with options D & E.

(E) of stashing such money as he received to hide evidence that would be supportive of
as he received in past tense. Should be in past perfect.
also supportive of his claim of innosence - unidiomatic.

So ans is D.

Hope it helps.
Kudos pls if it helps
Manager
Joined: 20 Aug 2016
Posts: 51
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 1

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2017, 02:56
1
KUDOS
Just try to read it carefully and realize who does the action of stashing the money refers to!

In A,B and C , stashed refers to judge. Which is wrong. The judge didn't stash the money.

Read 'excused the juror' followed by 'of stashing'.

Excused the juror of stashing.

Excuse someone of something

Sent from my XT1562 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Director
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 754
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: 339 Q170 V169
Followers: 38

Kudos [?]: 141 [1] , given: 3

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2017, 21:39
1
KUDOS
leanhdung wrote:
Experts, please explain why in option D (which is supposed to be correct by GMAT Timer) GMAT uses preposition of while the correct idiom is excuse for?

Many thanks!
This is just a bad question. Leave it.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 212
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 731 [0], given: 974

Re: juror stashed the money [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2011, 08:43
Who can explain the OA, i.e. how "for having" can be parallel with "of stashing"?

Thanks beforehand.
Senior Manager
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 505 [0], given: 193

Re: juror stashed the money [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2011, 12:42
i went for C, D could be best option if it were for stashing
_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 168
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 5

Re: juror stashed the money [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2011, 13:30
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having....and....of stashing

Excused for is the correct idiom I guess, and having and stashing for ||ism?
_________________

12/2010 GMATPrep 1 620 (Q34/V41)
01/2011 GMATPrep 2 640 (Q42/V36)
01/2011 GMATPrep 3 700 (Q47/V39)
02/2011 GMATPrep 4 710 (Q48/V39)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 1 650 (Q46/V32)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 2 680 (Q46/V36)
02/2011 MGMAT CAT 3 710 (Q45/V41)

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 208
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 5

Re: juror stashed the money [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2011, 06:20
I still don't get how 'of stashing' is correct
Current Student
Joined: 02 Apr 2013
Posts: 66
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3
WE: Science (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 26

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 22:52
i hope somebody explains this OA...i dont get it at all
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2013
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 8

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 May 2014, 21:16
Kindly explain the use of "had received" in the OA. What is the past tense with respect to which "had received money" is furthur past?It must be that the juror first showed the photo & then he got the money?

What am I missing??
Intern
Joined: 09 May 2014
Posts: 15
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 May 2014, 21:35
Sorry, folks, but this sentence makes absolutely no sense. You may accuse someone of stashing, but you don't excuse them of stashing. Also, what does "hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence" mean? That he would prefer to be found guilty? Wouldn't he instead hide evidence contradicting his claim of innocence????

Who came up with this sentence anyway--Paris Hilton???? No, couldn't be--in that case, it would contain at least 4 or 5 "like"s.
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2014
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2014, 10:17
Narenn wrote:
D is Correct

It is important to know the structure of the sentence.

Main Clause :- (Subject)The judge (Main Verb)told (Direct Object)the jury that..........
Subordinate Clause :- (Subject)he (Verb)had excused (Object)a juror (Compound Predicate)for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

The compound predicate should contains two predicates (Two reasons for which Juror had been excused), that are parallel to each other.

Predicate 1 :- for having purposely provided murder photos to the media (Adjectival Clause - Modifying the object - Juror)
Predicate 2 :-
then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence. :- The verb stashed makes this part an independent clause referring to The Judge and thus is not parallel to Predicate 1. So A is out.

B) INCORRECT - for the same reason cited in Choice A

C) INCORRECT - for the same reason cited in Choice A

D) CORRECT - This choice converts the independent clause in Adjectival Phrase which is parallel to first predicate.

E) INCORRECT - Wordy structures :- such money as, that would be supportive of....

Hope that helps!

Sorry, but this still does not make sense to me.

We obviously deal with a parallel structure here, but "excuse so. of sth." is unidiomatic IMO.

Can someone comment on this?
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10368
Followers: 997

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2017, 06:22
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 123
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 205

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2017, 00:59
What's parallel to what here, I did not see a satisfying answeer? ' of stashing' is parallel to what?
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 199
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.56
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 93

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2017, 07:58
Hi sayantanc2k mikemcgarry egmat VeritasPrepKarishma

Can you explain to me why in option D (which is supposed to be correct by GMAT Timer) GMAT uses preposition of while the correct idiom is excuse for?

Many thanks!
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Last edited by leanhdung on 21 Apr 2017, 02:10, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 201
GPA: 3.31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 32

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2017, 08:51
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting his claim of innocence.

(A) stashed the money received to hide evidence supporting
(B) stashed such money as he received to hide evidence supporting
(C) stashed the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(D) of stashing the money he had received to hide evidence that would support
(E) of stashing such money as he received to hide evidence that would be supportive of
_________________

In case you find my posts helpful, give me Kudos. Thank you.

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 199
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.56
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 93

The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2017, 18:14
Experts, please explain why in option D (which is supposed to be correct by GMAT Timer) GMAT uses preposition of while the correct idiom is excuse for?

Many thanks!
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 483
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Followers: 143

Kudos [?]: 351 [0], given: 185

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2017, 07:43
Expert's post
Top Contributor
Sorry folks, this question is deeply, deeply flawed. The parallelism in (D) seems to be saying that the judge "excused a juror of stashing the money..." -- and that makes absolutely zero sense.

I don't know where this one came from, but please don't spend any more time worrying about it.
_________________

www.gmatninja.com + blog

Join us for the verbal experts' live chat every Wednesday, 8 am PST/8:30 pm IST! Details available here.

Rules for posting in verbal forum | How to use search function (before posting questions!)

GMAT Club's ultimate verbal study plan, 2017 edition

Re: The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for   [#permalink] 26 Apr 2017, 07:43
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes 4 20 Mar 2008, 01:40
The contest judges were told to give the prize to whomever 6 20 Nov 2007, 18:16
Bill Walton continued on playing, even though he had 6 13 Sep 2007, 11:54
Bill Walton continued on playing, even though he had 2 06 Jun 2007, 08:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by