GMATNinja wrote:
abhishekpasricha wrote:
Experts need help on one query :
Quote:
The largest of all the planets, not only is Jupiter three times so massive as Saturn, the next larger planet, but also possesses four of the largest satellites, or moons, in our solar system.
(B) not only is Jupiter three times as massive as Saturn, the next largest
(C) Jupiter, not only three times as massive as Saturn, the next largest
(D) Jupiter not only is three times as massive as Saturn, the next largest
In choice A, I have seen some post stating a modifier issue for A and B. However, according to my understanding this seems to be an inverted SV where the Jupiter still remains a subject. Therefore, the option should not be ruled out due to modifier issue because in option A & B the opening modifier is still modifying Jupiter only.
Please correct my understanding Expert
GMATNinja and others
Interesting question! First, while (A) and (B) do have an inverted sentence structure, the modifier placement is still questionable. To see why, consider a simple example:
"On the table was the burnt toast Tim made for his whiny children."
This is fine. Notice that we can flip the sentence around to make it more conventional, beginning with the subject: "The burnt toast Tim made... was on the table."
But now imagine that we tack an additional modifier describing the toast to the beginning of the sentence:
"Smelling of sulfur and gasoline, on the table was the burnt toast Tim made..."
Is “the burnt toast” still the subject of the sentence? Sure. But because there’s a greater distance between modifier and the flammable meal being described, it’s more confusing. Definitively wrong in a vacuum? Maybe not. But certainly not as good as “Smelling of sulfur and gasoline, the burnt toast…”
Same deal in in this question: placing "Jupiter" immediately after the comma -- as in (C), (D), and (E) -- makes it much clearer that the opening modifier refers to "Jupiter".
That said, the modifier placement isn’t the only issue. The parallelism is another major concern in (A) and (B), where the two items in the not only/but also construction are (1) a verb-noun pair ("is Jupiter") and (2) a verb ("possesses"): "not only (1) is Jupiter... but also (2) possesses...". That doesn't make much sense.
On the other hand, in choice (D), we have a perfectly parallel list of verbs: "Jupiter not only (verb 1) is... but also (verb 2) possesses...".
So even if you aren't completely sold by the opening modifier issue, the parallelism issue seals the deal and makes (D) a much better choice than (A) or (B).
GMATNinjaThanks for the nice explanation, especially for creative example.
Quote:
The largest of all the planets, not only is Jupiter three times so massive as Saturn, the next larger planet, but also possesses four of the largest satellites, or moons, in our solar system.
(B) not only is Jupiter three times as massive as Saturn, the next largest
(C) Jupiter, not only three times as massive as Saturn, the next largest
(D) Jupiter not only is three times as massive as Saturn, the next largest
I've some query for these 3 options.
In B, what if the highlighted part (
The largest of all the planets and
the next largest) is removed from the sentence? Does it make sense?
In C, 'not only' part has been used as non-essential modifier, but 'but also' has been kept as essential modifier. So, we can remove choice C for this inconsistency?
in D, 'not only' part used 'linking verb', which does not mean any actual task, but in the 'but also' part, the verb (possess) does some kind of job. So, how they are parallel each other?
Example:
Mr. X not only is an engineer but also teaches in the high school.---> this one does not make sense to me!
^^ linking verb (is) VS action verb (teaches)
Mr. X not only is an engineer but also is a doctor.--> this one makes sense to me!
^^ linking verb (is) VS linking verb (is)...
_________________