GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Oct 2019, 13:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The law firm of Sutherlin, Perez, and Associates

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2015
Posts: 204
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.82
WE: Corporate Finance (Retail Banking)
The law firm of Sutherlin, Perez, and Associates  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 22 Jun 2017, 22:39
2
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

75% (01:50) correct 25% (01:42) wrong based on 232 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The law firm of Sutherlin, Perez, and Associates is one of the most successful law firms whose primary specialization is in criminal defense cases. In fact, the firm has a better than 90 percent acquittal rate in such cases. Dalton is an attorney whose primary specialization is in divorce cases, so Dalton certainly cannot be a member of Sutherlin, Perez, and
Associates.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) offers in support of its conclusion pieces of evidence that are mutually contradictory

(B) overlooks the possibility that a person can practice law without being a member of a law firm

(C) concludes that someone is not a member of a group on the grounds that that person does not have a characteristic that the group as a whole has

(D) takes a high rate of success among the members of a group to indicate that the successes are evenly spread among the members

(E) states a generalization based on a selection that is not representative of the group about which the generalization is supposed to hold true

_________________
If you like my posts, please give kudos. Help me unlock gmatclub tests.

Originally posted by mkrishnabdrr on 22 Jun 2017, 18:05.
Last edited by broall on 22 Jun 2017, 22:39, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3577
The law firm of Sutherlin, Perez, and Associates  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2017, 05:58
The argument presents a generalized scenario and then talks about an individual.

It says since the firm is specialized in one skill while the person is specialized in another skill so that person doesn't belong to this firm.

We need to find out the flaw in the reasoning:

(A) offers in support of its conclusion pieces of evidence that are mutually contradictory : We are not told the two things are contradictory.

(B) overlooks the possibility that a person can practice law without being a member of a law firm : No, it is actually saying since that person is not practicing that thing, so he is not the member, This point is the other way round.

(C) concludes that someone is not a member of a group on the grounds that that person does not have a characteristic that the group as a whole has : Yes, so this is what the author is saying. Since that person doesn't have those characteristics, he cannot be the member of that group. Oh come on !!

(D) takes a high rate of success among the members of a group to indicate that the successes are evenly spread among the members : Success?? What is this?

(E) states a generalization based on a selection that is not representative of the group about which the generalization is supposed to hold true : He is using specialization from generalization. While the option is saying the other way round.
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1008
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: The law firm of Sutherlin, Perez, and Associates  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2017, 10:16
Imo C easy one
concludes that someone is not a member of a group on the grounds that that person does not have a characteristic that the group as a whole has
It tells us what the argument is missing
_________________
Current Student
Joined: 09 Oct 2016
Posts: 89
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.49

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2017, 10:21
What an awful question. This is not how the GMAT phrases CR questions

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Status: To infinity and beyond
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 243
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.31
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: The law firm of Sutherlin, Perez, and Associates  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2018, 11:41
C it is. Since the person doesn't have those characteristics, he cannot be the member of that group.perfect.
_________________
Please give kudos if you like my post.Thanks
Re: The law firm of Sutherlin, Perez, and Associates   [#permalink] 02 Jan 2018, 11:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by