It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 01:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The Line of descent of apes and human is beleived my most

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 867

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
The Line of descent of apes and human is beleived my most [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2007, 18:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:22) wrong based on 5 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Line of descent of apes and human is beleived my most paleontologists that it split into several branches some time between 20 million and 5 million years ago

(A) that it split
(B) to have split
(C) to split
(D) that they were split
(E) to be split

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2007, 18:52
believed to be is the correct idiom.

I pick E

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 852

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2007, 19:46
'Believed to have' is also a correct idiom.
In this case,B makes more sense as belief still exists...'to have'

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 318

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 0

Location: Orange County, CA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2007, 22:43
Quote:
The Line of descent of apes and human is beleived my most paleontologists that it split into several branches some time between 20 million and 5 million years ago

(A) that it split
(B) to have split
(C) to split
(D) that they were split
(E) to be split


I vote B.

If it happened 5 to 20 million years ago, it's clearly in the past and won't happen anytime again.

"...it is believed to have" correctly addresses this issue.

If we say "...to be split..." wouldn't that mean it is split and continues today? I think the next phrase (5 to 20 million years ago) would indicate that is no longer the case.

This is just what the voices in my head are telling me.. :shock:

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Line of ........... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2007, 08:24
I'd go with B as well.

A, D are out because "that" doesn't go with the sentence. , C is incomplete.

E makes is sound like the line of descent is split b/w 20 and 5 mil years ago, NOT split of descent between apes and human.

Fistail wrote:
The Line of descent of apes and human is beleived by most paleontologists that it split into several branches some time between 20 million and 5 million years ago

(A) that it split
(B) to have split
(C) to split
(D) that they were split
(E) to be split

_________________

http://gmatstuff.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Line of ........... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2007, 23:35
Fistail wrote:
The Line of descent of apes and human is beleived By most paleontologists that it split into several branches some time between 20 million and 5 million years ago

(A) that it split
(B) to have split
(C) to split
(D) that they were split
(E) to be split


B. (i know its short, but plz underline the part in need of correction)

A. it split? the line of decsent... is believed... that it split??? wrong

C. to split... need present perfect to show a past action

D. they is ambigious and has no clear referent

E. to be split, in my time w/ the GMAT i have been told that to be is usually taboo on the GMAT. but, believed to be split... some time btwn 20 million and 5 million years ago... this construction is akward and requires a construction w/ past action

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 867

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Re: SC: Line of ........... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2007, 18:39
Fistail wrote:
The Line of descent of apes and human is beleived my most paleontologists that it split into several branches some time between 20 million and 5 million years ago

(A) that it split
(B) to have split
(C) to split
(D) that they were split
(E) to be split



I thought it E but OA is B. :roll:

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

Re: SC: Line of ...........   [#permalink] 05 Aug 2007, 18:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Line of descent of apes and human is beleived my most

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.