It is currently 24 Feb 2018, 17:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1269
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2015, 03:12
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (01:09) correct 34% (01:28) wrong based on 215 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator defended himself: "When I left the house that day, I was carrying no money with me, so I could not possibly have had anything to offer to the senator. Moreover, immediately before I met with the senator, I spent all my cash on lunch with a colleague at an upscale restaurant, which also explains why I was not in a position to offer the senator a bribe."

This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism?

A) It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one piece of the pieces of information provided in its support.
B) It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.
C) It does not preserve the proper time relationship between cause and effect.
D) It presents two pieces of evidence that do not support the same conclusion.
E) It confuses basic financial information with legal claims.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1199
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2015, 05:40
statement 1; When I left the house that day, I was carrying no money with me, so I could not possibly have had anything to offer to the senator.
statement 2: Immediately before I met with the senator, I spent all my cash on lunch with a colleague at an upscale restaurant, which also explains why I was not in a position to offer the senator a bribe."

This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism?

A) It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one piece of the pieces of information provided in its support. This does not define the flaw.
B) It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.
C) It does not preserve the proper time relationship between cause and effect.This is no time relationship here
D) It presents two pieces of evidence that do not support the same conclusion.They support same conclusion no money at the end of the day.
E) It confuses basic financial information with legal claims. There is no such confusion.

Harley1980, can u just tell me whether i defined the reason behind eliminating option D correctly.
I just got confused between B and D and selected B first time.
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 May 2010
Posts: 188
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge
Re: The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2015, 06:37
[quote="Mechmeera"]statement 1; When I left the house that day, I was carrying no money with me, so I could not possibly have had anything to offer to the senator.
statement 2: Immediately before I met with the senator, I spent all my cash on lunch with a colleague at an upscale restaurant, which also explains why I was not in a position to offer the senator a bribe."

This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism?

A) It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one piece of the pieces of information provided in its support. This does not define the flaw.
B) It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.
C) It does not preserve the proper time relationship between cause and effect.This is no time relationship here
D) It presents two pieces of evidence that do not support the same conclusion.[color=#790000]They support same conclusion no money at the end of the day.[/

Evidence 1. : No money

Evidence 2 : Had money but expended.

Both are contradictory. No conclusions are same.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1269
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2015, 09:38
Mechmeera wrote:
statement 1; When I left the house that day, I was carrying no money with me, so I could not possibly have had anything to offer to the senator.
statement 2: Immediately before I met with the senator, I spent all my cash on lunch with a colleague at an upscale restaurant, which also explains why I was not in a position to offer the senator a bribe."

This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism?

A) It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one piece of the pieces of information provided in its support. This does not define the flaw.
B) It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.
C) It does not preserve the proper time relationship between cause and effect.This is no time relationship here
D) It presents two pieces of evidence that do not support the same conclusion.They support same conclusion no money at the end of the day.
E) It confuses basic financial information with legal claims. There is no such confusion.

Harley1980, can u just tell me whether i defined the reason behind eliminating option D correctly.
I just got confused between B and D and selected B first time.


Hello Mechmeera

Actually you already answer to your question by yourself ;)

D) It presents two pieces of evidence that do not support the same conclusion.They support same conclusion no money at the end of the day.

Both pieces of evidence support the conclusion and answer D says that both pieces are not support the same conclusion
That is why D is wrong.
_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1199
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2015, 11:42
Harley1980 wrote:
Mechmeera wrote:
statement 1; When I left the house that day, I was carrying no money with me, so I could not possibly have had anything to offer to the senator.
statement 2: Immediately before I met with the senator, I spent all my cash on lunch with a colleague at an upscale restaurant, which also explains why I was not in a position to offer the senator a bribe."

This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism?

A) It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one piece of the pieces of information provided in its support. This does not define the flaw.
B) It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim.
C) It does not preserve the proper time relationship between cause and effect.This is no time relationship here
D) It presents two pieces of evidence that do not support the same conclusion.They support same conclusion no money at the end of the day.
E) It confuses basic financial information with legal claims. There is no such confusion.

Harley1980, can u just tell me whether i defined the reason behind eliminating option D correctly.
I just got confused between B and D and selected B first time.


Hello Mechmeera

Actually you already answer to your question by yourself ;)

D) It presents two pieces of evidence that do not support the same conclusion.They support same conclusion no money at the end of the day.

Both pieces of evidence support the conclusion and answer D says that both pieces are not support the same conclusion
That is why D is wrong.


Now I got it. :oops:
Thanks Harley1980.
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1922
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2018, 05:54
this question contains a common pattern in gmat.
"spent all cash" >< "carry no cash". There are key words.
E is closed, but E is a distractor. Why? It is because bribery is both a financial matter and a legal matter; thus, there should be no confusion here.
The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator   [#permalink] 11 Jan 2018, 05:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The lobbyist accused of offering a large cash bribe to the senator

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.