It is currently 16 Oct 2017, 21:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 01:05
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical evidence that breathing other people’s tobacco smoke increases the incidence of heart disease or lung cancer in healthy nonsmokers, legislation banning smoking in workplaces cannot be justified on health grounds.

Of the following, which is the best criticism of the argument reported above?

(A) It ignores causes of lung cancer other than smoking.
(B) It neglects the damaging effects of smoke-filled air on nonsmokers who are not healthy.
(C) It fails to mention the roles played by diet, exercise, and heredity in the development of heart disease.
(D) It does not consider the possibility that nonsmokers who breathe smoke-filled air at work may become more concerned about their health.
(E) It does not acknowledge that nonsmokers, even those who breathe smoke-filled air at work, are in general healthier than smokers.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 01:58
Please tell me its (E)

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1116

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 02:00
Is it C ?
_________________

Trying hard to conquer Quant.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 713

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Location: Madrid
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 03:36
D for me on this one
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: CR - Smoking [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 03:59
I'll go for B:

A - irrelevant, the argument discusses the smoking effects and ban.
B - right. The statistics the tabacco lobby cites only refers to healthy nonsmokers. Very few people are healthy.
C - irrelevant, addresses only the heart disease but not lung cancer, and if it were relevant it would provide support for the lobbyists, notr criticicize them: "yeah guys what don't you eat healthy and exercise more instead of prohibiting peiple from smoking"
D - so what if they become concerned ? anyway they may or may not- that's a weak argument
E - it doesn't matter if they are healthier in general because the ground for the ban are specific diseases and it's the evidence against those diseases that the lobbyists cite
_________________

________________________________
"Amicus Plato, sed magic amica veritas"

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 04:50
(B) looks fine.
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5208

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 05:54
Yurik79 wrote:
D for me on this one


I agree with Yurik here. These people may not take notice in their health until they suffer the consequences of second hand smoke.

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 702

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 06:52
Caught Between B and D.

D is the better choice than B.

All other options are out of scope.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 07:04
(B) It neglects the damaging effects of smoke-filled air on nonsmokers who are not healthy.

The lobbyists cite "affect on healthy ..." ignoring unhealthy nonsmokers who may be affected too.

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 524

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Location: US
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 07:13
straight one B...

argument only takes care of healthy non-smokers. that's the issue.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 791

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 07:22
Definitely b/w B and D.

Should be a straight B - I don't think a legislation can be raised just because people start becoming concerned; there must be some solid health ground.
_________________

Uh uh. I know what you're thinking. "Is the answer A, B, C, D or E?" Well to tell you the truth in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself. But you've gotta ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk?

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 233

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 17:08
B. What's d OA?

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2893

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2006, 23:37
Between B and D, I go with D.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 23 Aug 2006, 23:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.