It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 02:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2007, 18:46
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical evidence that breathing other people’s tobacco smoke increases the incidence of heart disease or lung cancer in healthy nonsmokers, legislation banning smoking in workplaces

. Of the following, which is the best criticism of the argument reported above?

(A) It ignores causes of lung cancer other than smoking.
(B) It neglects the damaging effects of smoke-filled air on nonsmokers who are not healthy.
(C) It fails to mention the roles played by diet, exercise, and heredity in the development of heart disease.
(D) It does not consider the possibility that nonsmokers who breathe smoke-filled air at work may become more concerned about their health.
(E) It does not acknowledge that nonsmokers, even those who breathe smoke-filled air at work, are in general healthier than smokers.
annot be justified on health grounds.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 325

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2007, 02:43
I'll go with (B).

the argument doesn't take care of nonsmokers who are not healthy.

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

02 Jul 2007, 02:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.