Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 28 May 2017, 05:49

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 7

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2008, 13:01
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical evidence that breathing other peoples tobacco smoke increases the incidence of heart disease or lung cancer in healthy nonsmokers, legislation banning smoking in workplaces cannot be justified on health grounds.

Q. Of the following, which is the best criticism of the argument reported above?

A. It ignores causes of lung cancer other than smoking.

B. It neglects the damaging effects of smoke-filled air on nonsmokers who are not healthy.

C. It fails to mention the roles played by diet, exercise, and heredity in the development of heart disease.

D. It does not consider the possibility that nonsmokers who breathe smoke-filled air at work may become more concerned about their health.

E. It does not acknowledge that nonsmokers, even those who breathe smoke-filled air at work, are in general healthier than smokers.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 975
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 5

Re: CR - Smoker [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2008, 14:51
I'd go with B.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 543
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 92

Re: CR - Smoker [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2008, 15:30
B for me
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 243
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Smoker [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2008, 17:14
IMO B
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1409
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 388 [0], given: 1

Re: CR - Smoker [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2008, 19:25
B is my answer.

It came down to B & D. I ruled out D because the conclusion is legislation banning smoking in workplaces cannot be justified on health grounds. Also the stem talks about healthy workers. It conveniently leaves out unhealthy workers.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1382
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 330 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Smoker [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2008, 01:18
rao_1857 wrote:
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical evidence that breathing other peoples tobacco smoke increases the incidence of heart disease or lung cancer in healthy nonsmokers, legislation banning smoking in workplaces cannot be justified on health grounds.

Q. Of the following, which is the best criticism of the argument reported above?

A. It ignores causes of lung cancer other than smoking.

B. It neglects the damaging effects of smoke-filled air on nonsmokers who are not healthy.-> IMO B the analysis neglects healthy non-smokers

C. It fails to mention the roles played by diet, exercise, and heredity in the development of heart disease.

D. It does not consider the possibility that nonsmokers who breathe smoke-filled air at work may become more concerned about their health.

E. It does not acknowledge that nonsmokers, even those who breathe smoke-filled air at work, are in general healthier than smokers.

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1553
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Smoker [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2008, 06:08
Another B.
Re: CR - Smoker   [#permalink] 12 Sep 2008, 06:08
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The pharmaceutical industry argues that because new drugs tracyyahoo 9 03 Aug 2011, 21:41
Critical Reasoning - Lobbyist EnterMatrix 4 02 Aug 2010, 06:08
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical balboa 4 13 Aug 2008, 06:15
The Pharmaceutical industry argues that because new drugs beatgmat 6 01 Sep 2007, 02:14
The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical crazy123 1 02 Jul 2007, 02:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.