It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 23:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The Low Down on Rankings

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

The Low Down on Rankings [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2006, 09:14
Reads like a typical boring task force report until about page 8/9~
Attachments

AACSB Task Force.pdf [832.94 KiB]
Downloaded 144 times

To download please login or register as a user

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5926

Kudos [?]: 2209 [0], given: 7

Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Premium Member
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2006, 09:45
I've been saying this all along. It's a game. You increase tuition, you invite as many unqualified applicants as possible to apply, you artificially pump up GMAT scores for no reason other than rank, and you make yourself appear more selective than you truly are.

That said, excellent post and everyone should read this.

Kudos [?]: 2209 [0], given: 7

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2302

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 0

Schools: Darden
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2006, 11:37
Very interesting report. I disagree with their conclusion that pumping money into things like comfortable facilities and concierge services does not help improve a business school. In BW's rankings this year, they cite a huge improvement in concierge type services for recruiters at Berkeley, and in turn many recruiters that didn't used to recruit at the school now recruit there. Also, if nice fancy facilities help attract the best students, that does in fact improve the quality of the program.

I do agree that pumping up things like admit rate, yield and average scores do help to increase the perceived selectivity and quality of a school. A rise in such perceived quality (reflected in rankings and other things) will have the effect of attracting better students and might, after several years, result in an actual improvement in quality. That's why I believe, if you think you will ever look for a job down the road, it is important to consider improvements that a school is making.

For example, Michigan is just outside ultra-elite status right now, but if their grand new building allows them to attract more top students and brings in more top employers, the result could be improved rankings down the road, which would in turn help attract more students and recruiters, etc. Increased selectivity and yield would also naturally result. It sure seems to have worked for Chicago.

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2006
Posts: 1855

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 2

Schools: The Duke MBA, Class of 2009
facilities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2006, 15:08
Yes, two schools in my portfolio are building fancy new digs - Stanford and UNC. Of course, neither will be done while I might there. Go figure.

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 2

facilities   [#permalink] 26 Dec 2006, 15:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Low Down on Rankings

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.