Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 23:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 408
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 290 [4] , given: 34

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2012, 16:27
4
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
egmat wrote:
joshnsit wrote:
Hey egmat
In Choice E, I came to conclusion that the phrase "In two letters to the historian Tacitus" is modifying "the nephew of Pliny the Elder", which is the subject of next clause as well. I scratched the choice E while answering this and now I am scratching my head wondering the principle behind prepositional Modifier logic used here. MGMAT explicit says that a modifying phrase should pair up with the closest noun it is associated with. WIth that in mind, I visualized that "the nephew is in two letters" and selected A upon E. What am I missing here?

Hi @joshnsit,

Prepositional phrases are very versatile modifiers. They can modify nouns as well as verbs. When a prepositional phrase modifies a noun, then it must be placed as close to the noun it modifies as possible. This is important to avoid any ambiguity in modification and to keep the intended meaning of the sentence clear.

So whenever we come across a prepositional phrase, we must first ascertain whether it is modifying a noun or a verb. So let’s bring in the OG question here and identify the entity the prepositional phrase should modify.

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

The sentence says that the nephew of Pliny the elder was the only eyewitness to the great eruption of Vesuvius. So he wrote this eyewitness account in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

The meaning of the sentence helps us determine which identity the prepositional phrase should modify. Here the prepositional phrase “in two letters” should modify the verb “wrote”. Where did the nephew of Pliny the Elder write his eyewitness account? He wrote it in two letters. So this prepositional phrase is modifying the verb “wrote”.

Now notice that “in two letters” is placed close to “the great eruption of Vesuvius”. Since prepositional phrases can also modify nouns, in choice A it seems that this modifier is actually modifying “eruption”. The modification seems to suggest that the eruption actually took place in two letters. Hence, the placement of “in two letters” is not correct in choice A.

Now let’s analyze choice E:

In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

The opening modifier in this choice is correctly modifying the following main clause. It is correctly modifying that what happened in tow letters. In two letters, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote what he saw. Hence, choice E is the correct answer.

Take Away:
1. Prepositional phrases can modify both nouns and verbs.
2. First ascertain the entity the prepositional phrase should modify and then see if their placement is correct.
3. If the prepositional phrase should modify a noun entity then place it after that noun entity.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha

Hey egmat/Shraddha
This was certainly helpful. I found something which is worth sharing and I can draw a parallel with what you describe. I found it on http://www.chompchomp.com/terms/prepositionalphrase.htm

A prepositional phrase will function as an adjective or adverb. (This becomes parallel with your first take away: Prepositional phrases can modify both nouns and verbs because they modify by qualifying verbs and nouns in the sentence.)

What explained next is really good.
As an adjective, the prepositional phrase will answer the question Which one?
The book on the bathroom floor is swollen from shower steam.
Which book? The one on the bathroom floor!

The sweet potatoes in the vegetable bin are green with mold.
Which sweet potatoes? The ones forgotten in the vegetable bin!

As an adverb, a prepositional phrase will answer questions such as How? When? or Where?
Freddy is stiff from yesterday's long football practice.
How did Freddy get stiff? From yesterday's long football practice!

Before class, Josh begged his friends for a pencil.
When did Josh do his begging? Before class!

The second example for prepositional phrase here explains the choice E here.

Your example has definitely reinforced what I found. The method of splitting sentence as used by you for choice A is really a good approach for identifying the nature of preposition(noun/adjective or verbal/adverb). Thanks a lot for explaining this.
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

Last edited by joshnsit on 24 Jul 2012, 05:18, edited 1 time in total.
 e-GMAT Discount Codes Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes Magoosh Discount Codes
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1391
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 856

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2012, 08:36
Thank you e- gmat.
the standard e-gmat process also work well for this kind of question, which is underlined all.

I see this kind of question is hard and takes us a lot of time.

I am an e gmat customer and wish that you write an article of how to approch this kind of question. Of course, the process is similar to your standard process but you can add more detail on the step: accertain the entity which the prepositional phrase should modify.

The problem we face when doing this kind of question is that after reading the original sentence, we understand nothing. HOw we can infer the intended meaning . The prepositional phrases are misplaced. HOw can we infer the intended meaing and correct places.

normally, if preposinal phrase modifying noun is misplaced, we can reliace the illogicness and can find the correct place/intended meaning. But when the prepositional phrase modifying a verb is misplaced, I can hardly realize the intended meaning/correct places.

do you have any idea of this problem? pls, explain.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3830
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 818

Kudos [?]: 6312 [1] , given: 324

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2012, 10:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacit us.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacit us. ---- The eruption of Vesuvius in two letters is wrong word order; After all, the eruption did not occur in two letters

(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius. ---- is it the accounts or account? The plural term -accounts - is wrong in this context. In addition, the letters being called as eyewitness accounts distorts the meaning. Do letters witness?

(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius. ----- The shift of tense to present –is- is not acceptable. In addition, if a present participle does not have a comma before it, it is supposed to modify the noun it touches. If the writing refers to Pliny the Elder, who actually wrote the letters?

(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.---- same error as in A; In addition - accounted for –is wrong diction: It may also mean be responsible for and that the nephew took responsibility for the eruption

(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius; the best

Very often, in convoluted and complex structures, You will find some easy grammar clues to tide over the jumble. You can keep this in mind as a handy tool
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 10

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2013, 12:29
Quote:
Hi @joshnsit,

Prepositional phrases are very versatile modifiers. They can modify nouns as well as verbs. When a prepositional phrase modifies a noun, then it must be placed as close to the noun it modifies as possible. This is important to avoid any ambiguity in modification and to keep the intended meaning of the sentence clear.

So whenever we come across a prepositional phrase, we must first ascertain whether it is modifying a noun or a verb. So let’s bring in the OG question here and identify the entity the prepositional phrase should modify.

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

The sentence says that the nephew of Pliny the elder was the only eyewitness to the great eruption of Vesuvius. So he wrote this eyewitness account in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

The meaning of the sentence helps us determine which identity the prepositional phrase should modify. Here the prepositional phrase “in two letters” should modify the verb “wrote”. Where did the nephew of Pliny the Elder write his eyewitness account? He wrote it in two letters. So this prepositional phrase is modifying the verb “wrote”.

Now notice that “in two letters” is placed close to “the great eruption of Vesuvius”. Since prepositional phrases can also modify nouns, in choice A it seems that this modifier is actually modifying “eruption”. The modification seems to suggest that the eruption actually took place in two letters. Hence, the placement of “in two letters” is not correct in choice A.

Now let’s analyze choice E:

In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

The opening modifier in this choice is correctly modifying the following main clause. It is correctly modifying that what happened in tow letters. In two letters, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote what he saw. Hence, choice E is the correct answer.

Take Away:
1. Prepositional phrases can modify both nouns and verbs.
2. First ascertain the entity the prepositional phrase should modify and then see if their placement is correct.
3. If the prepositional phrase should modify a noun entity then place it after that noun entity.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha

Honestly, this post shows again the paradoxity of egmat. I mean, youre post is excellent. But why dont you provide stuff like that to your customers? Why do I - as a customer - have to search in a public forum for such a great explanation from you. That is totally ridicolous.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2022
Followers: 2214

Kudos [?]: 7745 [0], given: 291

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 23:04
steilbergauf wrote:

Honestly, this post shows again the paradoxity of egmat. I mean, youre post is excellent. But why dont you provide stuff like that to your customers? Why do I - as a customer - have to search in a public forum for such a great explanation from you. That is totally ridicolous.

Hi Steilbergauf,

We are happy that you liked the post. Thank you for your kind words. It’s not a surprise that the post is well written considering that it was written by one of the best Sentence Correction experts in the world.

As educators, our role is to teach you the core concepts, and help you apply them. To that end, our Sentence Correction course contains 550+ examples and exercises, 14+ application files, and in depth series and a bunch of other things – basically all the concepts that you need + a lot of practice that should help you nail both concepts and application. I hope you have gone through the course and are studying the course using the best practices.

Now, remember that in order to ace the GMAT, you need to learn how to apply the concepts. Now in our course we provide all the necessary tools for our students to learn how to apply the concepts. Most people (read 90%+) are able to master application using the content listed in the study plan.

Other than that, yes we provide guidance to other students on GMAT Club as well. But as you can see here, we are not teaching any new concept that is not already covered in our course. The above post is talking merely about the application of concepts that you have already learnt. And frankly, in my humble opinion, you should not be going through all these application based posts in the first place unless you have a doubt on these questions. This is because going through such application posts frequently may impact your ability to independently apply the process.

I suggest you focus your energy and time on mastering the 3 step process and solving the OG questions using the same. And while applying the process, if you face challenges, you can always seek our help

Regards,
Krishna
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Intern
Joined: 21 Nov 2012
Posts: 15
Schools: Duke '15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2013, 00:21
Hallo sraddha,

Thanks for showing error analysis and POE work always .One qyery Take away mentioned that while using prepositional phrase for noun modification we need to use it after the noun . For verb is there any such thing ...or the phrase can be placed either side of the verb

Thanks.
Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 220
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 47

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2014, 05:38
sacmanitin wrote:
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

Guys one more full underline SC ,
my work is as below:

in B letters are said as only eyewitness accounts
C is wordy for using only eyewitness account.......an account
D also looks ackward for using nephew accounted for the great eruption

now for me (A) and (E) are same why to choose one over other???

Experts Explain

A is extremely outdrawn, has no punctuation at all, and is just confusing and exhausting to read. That was the reason I eliminated A and went with E.
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 178
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 56

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2014, 05:45
aeglorre wrote:
A is extremely outdrawn, has no punctuation at all, and is just confusing and exhausting to read. That was the reason I eliminated A and went with E.

You don't eliminate choices on the basis of punctuation (or that the sentence is confusing. Definitely, two options will be equally good that they will confuse you).

My suggestion - Try to understand why an option is wrong/right (what is the meaning intended, what are the contructs etc)

The difference between A and E is a misplaced modifier.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius
_________________

Read my posts...
What are modifiers ??

Manager
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 116
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 271

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2014, 13:01
sacmanitin wrote:
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

Guys one more full underline SC ,
my work is as below:

in B letters are said as only eyewitness accounts
C is wordy for using only eyewitness account.......an account
D also looks ackward for using nephew accounted for the great eruption

now for me (A) and (E) are same why to choose one over other???

Experts Explain

Will Option A be correct if there would be a comman before the last prep phrase
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius, in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
Manager
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 160
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 69

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2014, 12:52
Are there any other OG questions that are based on Prepositional phrases?
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2013
Posts: 64
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 131

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2014, 05:11
sacmanitin wrote:
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

Guys one more full underline SC ,
my work is as below:

in B letters are said as only eyewitness accounts
C is wordy for using only eyewitness account.......an account
D also looks ackward for using nephew accounted for the great eruption

now for me (A) and (E) are same why to choose one over other???

Experts Explain

What kind of modification does being in Option b plays.
OG Says"the verb phrase that begins
being the only eyewitness accounts modifies the subject of the preceding clause, suggesting nonsensically that the nephew of Pliny the Elder himself was the eyewitness accounts"
Can u give an example of comma+being modifying subject of the clause.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2022
Followers: 2214

Kudos [?]: 7745 [0], given: 291

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2014, 11:58
Hi @abid1986,

Thank you for posting your question. You are correct in stating that the usage of "being" as a modifier in this sentence is incorrect.

I hope you have read our article on correct uses of "Being". If not then please take some time to review that article here. In this article, we have outlined how "being" is used correctly in GMAT sentences.

Do let us know if you have any other doubts.

Happy Learning!

Regards,

Payal
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Director
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 612
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 78

Kudos [?]: 496 [0], given: 298

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2014, 06:23
egmat wrote:
Since you have posted a doubt on C and E, lets consider choices A, C, and E only:

Meaning Analysis - (Choice A)

• The sentence talks about a person X - who is nephew of Pliny the Elder
• Person X wrote the only eyewitness account.
• This account is of the great eruption of Vesuvius
• He wrote the account in two letters
• The letters were written to the historian Tacitus

Errors Analysis of Choice A

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

Logically the modifier in “red” should provide additional information about the action – wrote – where did he write this only eyewitness account. But its placement after “eruption of Vesuvius” implies that the “eruption took place in two letters”. This is illogical. This is the error in choice A.

Answer Choice Analysis – Choice C

The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

First of all this choice only communicates partial meaning:
• It is not clear that the “only eyewitness account” is of the great eruption of Vesuvius”. This sentence seems to imply that the ONLY eyewitness account is in the letters that contain an account of the eruption of Vesuvius. This is clearly not what we want to communicate. We want to talk specifically about the ONLY eyewitness account of eruption of Vesuvius.

Secondly, the expression “nephew …writing to the historian Tacitus..” non-sensically describes the nephew and somehow gives the sense that the nephew is still writing the letters. This should instead express a one- time action done by the nephew.

Answer Choice Analysis – Choice E

In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
This sentence correctly communicates the meaning.

Your statement that "nephew of Pliny the Elder" seems to refer to historian Tacitus.” is not correct. Note that the modifier is not “historian Tacitus”. The complete modifier is “in two letters to the historian Tacitus”. Now this prepositional modifier provides more information about the action – wrote. Where did the nephew write? In the 2 letters to historian Tacitus.

I hope this answers your questions.

Take-away

– Focus on the meaning of the sentence and pay close attention to how the sentence structure of the sentences.

Payal

You guys always gives awesome solutions. You are the best among all.
_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.
My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Director
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 612
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 78

Kudos [?]: 496 [0], given: 298

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2014, 08:52
egmat wrote:
Since you have posted a doubt on C and E, lets consider choices A, C, and E only:

Meaning Analysis - (Choice A)

• The sentence talks about a person X - who is nephew of Pliny the Elder
• Person X wrote the only eyewitness account.
• This account is of the great eruption of Vesuvius
• He wrote the account in two letters
• The letters were written to the historian Tacitus

Errors Analysis of Choice A

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

Logically the modifier in “red” should provide additional information about the action – wrote – where did he write this only eyewitness account. But its placement after “eruption of Vesuvius” implies that the “eruption took place in two letters”. This is illogical. This is the error in choice A.

Answer Choice Analysis – Choice C

The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.

First of all this choice only communicates partial meaning:
• It is not clear that the “only eyewitness account” is of the great eruption of Vesuvius”. This sentence seems to imply that the ONLY eyewitness account is in the letters that contain an account of the eruption of Vesuvius. This is clearly not what we want to communicate. We want to talk specifically about the ONLY eyewitness account of eruption of Vesuvius.

Secondly, the expression “nephew …writing to the historian Tacitus..” non-sensically describes the nephew and somehow gives the sense that the nephew is still writing the letters. This should instead express a one- time action done by the nephew.

Answer Choice Analysis – Choice E

In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
This sentence correctly communicates the meaning.

Your statement that "nephew of Pliny the Elder" seems to refer to historian Tacitus.” is not correct. Note that the modifier is not “historian Tacitus”. The complete modifier is “in two letters to the historian Tacitus”. Now this prepositional modifier provides more information about the action – wrote. Where did the nephew write? In the 2 letters to historian Tacitus.

I hope this answers your questions.

Take-away

– Focus on the meaning of the sentence and pay close attention to how the sentence structure of the sentences.

Payal

Can you please explain again why being is wrong in B.

I think the nephew is the subject here.

Being is verb+ing modifier and it modifies the preceding clause and subject of the clause is the deciding factor.
_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.
My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Director
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 597
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 356 [0], given: 200

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2014, 08:14
(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

I still don't get the difference between these 2 choices: (A) it was said that "in two letters to the historian Tacitus" could modify great erution of Vesuvius --> but in (E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus can modify the nephew........... Both wrong , as it should modify wrote....
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2013
Posts: 99
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
Schools: Insead '14, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 08-28-2014
GPA: 3.86
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 23

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2014, 05:30
sacmanitin wrote:
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

Guys one more full underline SC ,
my work is as below:

in B letters are said as only eyewitness accounts
C is wordy for using only eyewitness account.......an account
D also looks ackward for using nephew accounted for the great eruption

now for me (A) and (E) are same why to choose one over other???

Experts Explain

As you have jolted down to between A & E :

I will try to highlight for what reasons i have rejected A :

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus

The nephew ...of Pliny the elder (Modifier) Wrote (Verb)

What does he wrote - he wrote in 2 letters ...the only eyewitness account of the .....

Since placement of only eyewitness account....(Modifier) is not correct, meaning is not clear !!

Hope it helps !!

Regards
LS
_________________

G-prep1 540 --> Kaplan 580-->Veritas 640-->MGMAT 590 -->MGMAT 2 640 --> MGMAT 3 640 ---> MGMAT 4 650 -->MGMAT 5 680 -- >GMAT prep 1 570

Give your best shot...rest leave upto Mahadev, he is the extractor of all negativity in the world !!

Chat Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 703
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 537

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2015, 00:00
The E looks better than A, that is why I chose E.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10368
Followers: 997

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Mar 2016, 02:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10368
Followers: 997

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2016, 07:48
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 113
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 31

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2017, 12:26
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

Issues: Structure | Meaning

Analysis:
1. This sentence is talking about multiple things, so let's break them apart.
- The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters
- Those letters were written to the historian Tacitus
- Those letters are the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius
The correct choice should connect these thoughts so that proper meaning is conveyed without any ambiguity.

(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
- Illogical as it implying that "great eruption of Vesuvius" occurred "in two letters to the historian Tacitus"

(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
- "To the historian Tacitus" - fragment
- ", being" incorrectly modifies the whole clause. It should only modify the letters.

(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitusan account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
- less preferred passive voice "by the nephew" (however this is not a error which alone can eliminate this option)
- "writing" is incorrect verb form
- "an account...." is connected with previous clause without a conjunction which is ungrammatical

(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder’s nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
- "accounted for" has a different meaning than intended in the sentence.
- Illogical as it implying that "great eruption of Vesuvius" occurred "in two letters to the historian Tacitus"

(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

Answer: (E)
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness   [#permalink] 19 Feb 2017, 12:26

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 41 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Dudley Moore and Peter Cook not only wrote the 1960s BBC comedy "Not o 6 23 Jul 2015, 01:09
19 Based on eye-witness accounts, claims of alien autopsy 16 21 Sep 2016, 15:15
2 The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the 11 15 Sep 2015, 02:45
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness 0 08 Sep 2016, 07:48
3 The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness 6 29 Feb 2016, 20:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.