It is currently 24 Sep 2017, 21:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 01 May 2013
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 2

The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2013, 02:22
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

30% (01:38) correct 70% (01:55) wrong based on 468 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Hey Guys,

Can you please help me solve this question. Please answer with a proper and detailed explanation. I got this question from Princeton Review test and cannot make any sense of their explanation.

Thanks a ton!!!

The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imposes a large burden on people who live or work near airports. When airports operate late at night or early in the morning, the disturbance can disrupt normal sleeping patterns, even leading to severe sleep deprivation disorders. When the flight paths of airplanes lie too close to the ground, the resulting noise interferes with work performance in nearby businesses and the peaceful enjoyment of life by residents in the proximity. However, the operation of an airport, unlike a neighbor who simply plays music too loudly, provides a valuable benefit to the surrounding community, in the form of convenient transportation for both personal and economic purposes. Thus the only option is to establish standards for the reasonable operation of airports and fine those that violate the guidelines.

The bolded phrase plays which of the following roles in the argument above?

a) It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.
b) It provides background information that is not directly related to the conclusion of the argument.
c) It supports a policy of stricter regulations for airports than for neighbors playing of music.
d) It undermines the argument advocating a system of regulations and fines for the unreasonable operation of an airport.
e) It explains why some people choose to live near enough to airports to be affected by the noise.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 3

Re: the operation of an airport [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2013, 14:11
kalravaibhav wrote:
Hey Guys,

Can you please help me solve this question. Please answer with a proper and detailed explanation. I got this question from Princeton Review test and cannot make any sense of their explanation.

Thanks a ton!!!

The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imposes a large burden on people who live or work near airports. When airports operate late at night or early in the morning, the disturbance can disrupt normal sleeping patterns, even leading to severe sleep deprivation disorders. When the flight paths of airplanes lie too close to the ground, the resulting noise interferes with work performance in nearby businesses and the peaceful enjoyment of life by residents in the proximity. However, the operation of an airport, unlike a neighbor who simply plays music too loudly, provides a valuable benefit to the surrounding community, in the form of convenient transportation for both personal and economic purposes. Thus the only option is to establish standards for the reasonable operation of airports and fine those that violate the guidelines.

The bolded phrase plays which of the following roles in the argument above?

a) It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.
b) It provides background information that is not directly related to the conclusion of the argument.
c) It supports a policy of stricter regulations for airports than for neighbors playing of music.
d) It undermines the argument advocating a system of regulations and fines for the unreasonable operation of an airport.
e) It explains why some people choose to live near enough to airports to be affected by the noise.

The alternative to establish standards is to shut down the airport, but this is clearly unacceptable, why? because it still provides values

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 452

Kudos [?]: 75 [1], given: 58

Re: The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2014, 12:47
1
KUDOS
mayer87 wrote:
kalravaibhav wrote:
Hey Guys,

Can you please help me solve this question. Please answer with a proper and detailed explanation. I got this question from Princeton Review test and cannot make any sense of their explanation.

Thanks a ton!!!

The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imposes a large burden on people who live or work near airports. When airports operate late at night or early in the morning, the disturbance can disrupt normal sleeping patterns, even leading to severe sleep deprivation disorders. When the flight paths of airplanes lie too close to the ground, the resulting noise interferes with work performance in nearby businesses and the peaceful enjoyment of life by residents in the proximity. However, the operation of an airport, unlike a neighbor who simply plays music too loudly, provides a valuable benefit to the surrounding community, in the form of convenient transportation for both personal and economic purposes. Thus the only option is to establish standards for the reasonable operation of airports and fine those that violate the guidelines.

The bolded phrase plays which of the following roles in the argument above?

a) It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.
b) It provides background information that is not directly related to the conclusion of the argument.
c) It supports a policy of stricter regulations for airports than for neighbors playing of music.
d) It undermines the argument advocating a system of regulations and fines for the unreasonable operation of an airport.
e) It explains why some people choose to live near enough to airports to be affected by the noise.

The alternative to establish standards is to shut down the airport, but this is clearly unacceptable, why? because it still provides values

Why do you assume that the other option is shutting down the airport?
How about moving it someplace else? limiting the times?

Kudos [?]: 75 [1], given: 58

Intern
Joined: 16 May 2014
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Re: The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2014, 05:12
Why E cannot be the answer?

It explains clearly the reason for the bold line.

Thanks,
Amit

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 36 [1], given: 10

The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2014, 02:25
1
KUDOS
kalravaibhav wrote:
Hey Guys,

Can you please help me solve this question. Please answer with a proper and detailed explanation. I got this question from Princeton Review test and cannot make any sense of their explanation.

Thanks a ton!!!

The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imposes a large burden on people who live or work near airports. When airports operate late at night or early in the morning, the disturbance can disrupt normal sleeping patterns, even leading to severe sleep deprivation disorders. When the flight paths of airplanes lie too close to the ground, the resulting noise interferes with work performance in nearby businesses and the peaceful enjoyment of life by residents in the proximity. However, the operation of an airport, unlike a neighbor who simply plays music too loudly, provides a valuable benefit to the surrounding community, in the form of convenient transportation for both personal and economic purposes. Thus the only option is to establish standards for the reasonable operation of airports and fine those that violate the guidelines.

The bolded phrase plays which of the following roles in the argument above?

a) It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.
b) It provides background information that is not directly related to the conclusion of the argument.
c) It supports a policy of stricter regulations for airports than for neighbors playing of music.
d) It undermines the argument advocating a system of regulations and fines for the unreasonable operation of an airport.
e) It explains why some people choose to live near enough to airports to be affected by the noise.

Hi,

Let me try to help. A simplified version of the passage: Because of A, there are disadvantages. However, there is a benefit too. Thus, reasonable operation of A is ok but should be fined otherwise.

Now, lets look at options:

1. Bold phrase which provides the benefit is trying to delineate that one potential solution cannot solve the problem because there are both advantages and disadvantages arising out of the situation. It means that we cannot abandon airport operations at the same time cannot allow unreasonable operations -> Correct answer.

2. Bold phrase gives the benefit because of which the conclusion is two fold: continue reasonable operation and fine unreasonable operation. Else it would be only ban the operation - so option B is related to conclusion

3. Bold phrase is not supporting strict policy. In fact, because of the bold face, the conclusion has agreed to reasonable operation

4. Bold phrase supports and not undermines

5. "Some" people may or may not choose to live next to Airport because of the benefit it provides but it is no way connected with the argument

Kudos [?]: 36 [1], given: 10

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 452

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 58

Re: The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2014, 05:45
arichinna wrote:
kalravaibhav wrote:
Hey Guys,

Can you please help me solve this question. Please answer with a proper and detailed explanation. I got this question from Princeton Review test and cannot make any sense of their explanation.

Thanks a ton!!!

The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imposes a large burden on people who live or work near airports. When airports operate late at night or early in the morning, the disturbance can disrupt normal sleeping patterns, even leading to severe sleep deprivation disorders. When the flight paths of airplanes lie too close to the ground, the resulting noise interferes with work performance in nearby businesses and the peaceful enjoyment of life by residents in the proximity. However, the operation of an airport, unlike a neighbor who simply plays music too loudly, provides a valuable benefit to the surrounding community, in the form of convenient transportation for both personal and economic purposes. Thus the only option is to establish standards for the reasonable operation of airports and fine those that violate the guidelines.

The bolded phrase plays which of the following roles in the argument above?

a) It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.
b) It provides background information that is not directly related to the conclusion of the argument.
c) It supports a policy of stricter regulations for airports than for neighbors playing of music.
d) It undermines the argument advocating a system of regulations and fines for the unreasonable operation of an airport.
e) It explains why some people choose to live near enough to airports to be affected by the noise.

Hi,

Let me try to help. A simplified version of the passage: Because of A, there are disadvantages. However, there is a benefit too. Thus, reasonable operation of A is ok but should be fined otherwise.

Now, lets look at options:

1. Bold phrase which provides the benefit is trying to delineate that one potential solution cannot solve the problem because there are both advantages and disadvantages arising out of the situation. It means that we cannot abandon airport operations at the same time cannot allow unreasonable operations -> Correct answer.

2. Bold phrase gives the benefit because of which the conclusion is two fold: continue reasonable operation and fine unreasonable operation. Else it would be only ban the operation - so option B is related to conclusion

3. Bold phrase is not supporting strict policy. In fact, because of the bold face, the conclusion has agreed to reasonable operation

4. Bold phrase supports and not undermines

5. "Some" people may or may not choose to live next to Airport because of the benefit it provides but it is no way connected with the argument

A: It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.

Where in the statement, does it say anything about an alternative?
It just says that it's fine as long as there are fines and regulations...
I need some help here please.
I went for E

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 58

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1127

Kudos [?]: 3414 [0], given: 123

Location: United States
Re: The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2014, 00:00
ronr34 wrote:
arichinna wrote:
kalravaibhav wrote:
Hey Guys,

Can you please help me solve this question. Please answer with a proper and detailed explanation. I got this question from Princeton Review test and cannot make any sense of their explanation.

Thanks a ton!!!

The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imposes a large burden on people who live or work near airports. When airports operate late at night or early in the morning, the disturbance can disrupt normal sleeping patterns, even leading to severe sleep deprivation disorders. When the flight paths of airplanes lie too close to the ground, the resulting noise interferes with work performance in nearby businesses and the peaceful enjoyment of life by residents in the proximity. However, the operation of an airport, unlike a neighbor who simply plays music too loudly, provides a valuable benefit to the surrounding community, in the form of convenient transportation for both personal and economic purposes. Thus the only option is to establish standards for the reasonable operation of airports and fine those that violate the guidelines.

The bolded phrase plays which of the following roles in the argument above?

a) It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.
b) It provides background information that is not directly related to the conclusion of the argument.
c) It supports a policy of stricter regulations for airports than for neighbors playing of music.
d) It undermines the argument advocating a system of regulations and fines for the unreasonable operation of an airport.
e) It explains why some people choose to live near enough to airports to be affected by the noise.

Hi,

Let me try to help. A simplified version of the passage: Because of A, there are disadvantages. However, there is a benefit too. Thus, reasonable operation of A is ok but should be fined otherwise.

Now, lets look at options:

1. Bold phrase which provides the benefit is trying to delineate that one potential solution cannot solve the problem because there are both advantages and disadvantages arising out of the situation. It means that we cannot abandon airport operations at the same time cannot allow unreasonable operations -> Correct answer.

2. Bold phrase gives the benefit because of which the conclusion is two fold: continue reasonable operation and fine unreasonable operation. Else it would be only ban the operation - so option B is related to conclusion

3. Bold phrase is not supporting strict policy. In fact, because of the bold face, the conclusion has agreed to reasonable operation

4. Bold phrase supports and not undermines

5. "Some" people may or may not choose to live next to Airport because of the benefit it provides but it is no way connected with the argument

A: It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.

Where in the statement, does it say anything about an alternative?
It just says that it's fine as long as there are fines and regulations...
I need some help here please.
I went for E

Hello Ron34

Let rephrase A: The bold part explains why one potential alternative other than establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.
It means the ONLY way is to establish a system of standards and fines.

Now, let read the last sentence of the argument:
Thus the only option is to establish standards for the reasonable operation of airports and fine those that violate the guidelines.

So, A is clearly the answer.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3414 [0], given: 123

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 452

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 58

Re: The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2014, 01:18
pqhai wrote:

Hello Ron34

Let rephrase A: The bold part explains why one potential alternative other than establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.
It means the ONLY way is to establish a system of standards and fines.

Now, let read the last sentence of the argument:
Thus the only option is to establish standards for the reasonable operation of airports and fine those that violate the guidelines.

So, A is clearly the answer.

Hi,
I still don't see where there is a reference to a different potential alternative. Where is that alternative even mentioned?
What is the alternative that is mentioned here?

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 58

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10167

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 0

Re: The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2016, 05:47
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2016
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2017, 14:33
ronr34 wrote:
arichinna wrote:
kalravaibhav wrote:
Hey Guys,

Can you please help me solve this question. Please answer with a proper and detailed explanation. I got this question from Princeton Review test and cannot make any sense of their explanation.

Thanks a ton!!!

The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imposes a large burden on people who live or work near airports. When airports operate late at night or early in the morning, the disturbance can disrupt normal sleeping patterns, even leading to severe sleep deprivation disorders. When the flight paths of airplanes lie too close to the ground, the resulting noise interferes with work performance in nearby businesses and the peaceful enjoyment of life by residents in the proximity. However, the operation of an airport, unlike a neighbor who simply plays music too loudly, provides a valuable benefit to the surrounding community, in the form of convenient transportation for both personal and economic purposes. Thus the only option is to establish standards for the reasonable operation of airports and fine those that violate the guidelines.

The bolded phrase plays which of the following roles in the argument above?

a) It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.
b) It provides background information that is not directly related to the conclusion of the argument.
c) It supports a policy of stricter regulations for airports than for neighbors playing of music.
d) It undermines the argument advocating a system of regulations and fines for the unreasonable operation of an airport.
e) It explains why some people choose to live near enough to airports to be affected by the noise.

Hi,

Let me try to help. A simplified version of the passage: Because of A, there are disadvantages. However, there is a benefit too. Thus, reasonable operation of A is ok but should be fined otherwise.

Now, lets look at options:

1. Bold phrase which provides the benefit is trying to delineate that one potential solution cannot solve the problem because there are both advantages and disadvantages arising out of the situation. It means that we cannot abandon airport operations at the same time cannot allow unreasonable operations -> Correct answer.

2. Bold phrase gives the benefit because of which the conclusion is two fold: continue reasonable operation and fine unreasonable operation. Else it would be only ban the operation - so option B is related to conclusion

3. Bold phrase is not supporting strict policy. In fact, because of the bold face, the conclusion has agreed to reasonable operation

4. Bold phrase supports and not undermines

5. "Some" people may or may not choose to live next to Airport because of the benefit it provides but it is no way connected with the argument

A: It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable.

Where in the statement, does it say anything about an alternative?
It just says that it's fine as long as there are fines and regulations...
I need some help here please.
I went for E

->
Here is my understanding of the problem (and I hope it clarifies where an alternative is implied even if one isn't explicitly stated). The statement in itself says "the operation of an airport, unlike a neighbor who simply plays music too loudly, provides a valuable benefit to the surrounding community,". This means that (1) this is a nuisance similar to that of a neighbor who plays music loudly (2) a neighbor who plays music loudly provides little or no benefit to the community (3) There exists ways of dealing with neighbors who play loud music that may not apply to airports.
The distinction I made to choose between (A) and (E) is to look at specifically what the question is asking. That is, the question wants to know the role of that exact sentence to the argument:
(A): It explains why one potential alternative to establishing a system of standards and fines is unacceptable => There are many "potential alternatives" to dealing with noisy surroundings. One of them may be to impose a system of standards and fines. Another may be to move out of the neighborhood entirely, or to complain to an authority etc. (any of which may extend to having a neighbor that plays loud music). Since the bold statement says that "unlike" how one would deal with noisy neighbors, airports can't be wished/cursed away, it says that one of many possible alternatives to dealing with this noisy neighbor is unacceptable
vs.
(E): It explains why some people choose to live near enough to airports to be affected by the noise. => It does not explain, it only states that this is true. This answer also does not capture the fact that a comparison was made across two "kinds" of noisy neighbors [which was I think the whole point]. [/color]

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The noise caused by airplanes during takeoff and landing imp   [#permalink] 22 Apr 2017, 14:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by