It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 11:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The number of aircraft collisions on the ground is

Author Message
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 504

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

The number of aircraft collisions on the ground is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2008, 04:16
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (02:39) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The number of aircraft collisions on the ground is increasing because of the substantial increase in the number of flights operated by the airlines. Many of the fatalities that occur in such collisions are caused not by the collision itself, but by an inherent flaw in the cabin design of most aircraft, in which seats, by restricting access to emergency exits, impede escape. Therefore, to reduce the total number of fatalities that result annually from such collisions, the airlines should be required to remove all seats that restrict access to emergency exits.

Which one of the following proposals, if implemented together with the proposal made in the passage, would improve the prospects for achieving the stated objective of reducing fatalities?

(B) The airlines should not be permitted to increase further the number of flights in order to offset the decrease in the number of seats on each aircraft.

(C) Airport authorities should be required to streamline their passenger check-in procedures to accommodate the increased number of passengers served by the airlines.

(D) Airport authorities should be required to refine security precautions by making them less conspicuous without making them less effective.

(E) The airlines should not be allowed to increase the ticket price for each passenger to offset the decrease in the number of seats on each aircraft.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 786

Kudos [?]: 130 [1], given: 25

Re: CR : Aircraft Safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2008, 16:55
1
KUDOS
B,

choosing between B and A, I think A is some what redundant to the rule stated in the question.

Kudos [?]: 130 [1], given: 25

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

Re: CR : Aircraft Safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2008, 04:39
tough call for me btwn A and B, but i will go for B.

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 535

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Re: CR : Aircraft Safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2008, 08:00
I get B as well.

Two factors are leading to the fatalities.

1. Increased flights are causing collisions.
2. restricted access is causing fatalities during collisions.

To reduce fatalities we need to address these issues.

C, D, and E, are irrelevant. Only A and B address at least one of these two issues.

The problem with A is that it is stated that "many of the fatalities" are caused by the restricted access, therefore some fatalities are cause by other reasons. So if you solve the restricted access but and add more planes you may reduce the fatalites from the restricted access but increase the fatalities from something else.

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 684

Kudos [?]: 615 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Aircraft Safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2008, 09:17
B for me too

1. increased planes
2. restricted access

are causing the accidents + fatalities

Airlines are taking care of 2 by removing the seats so to strengthen they should reduce or keep the number of planes constant thus B
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Kudos [?]: 615 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Location: United Kingdom
Re: CR : Aircraft Safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2008, 09:49
I will go for B .

C,D E are out of scope .A is covered by the argument itself as all the airlines have to remove seats that block exit ,whether its new or old .If B is implemented than no of flights will remain constant and will reduce the fatalities (The argument says many fatalities not all) that are caused by increased no of planes

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Aircraft Safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2008, 10:52
B - same reason as everyone else.

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 504

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Aircraft Safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2008, 10:54
OA : B

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 4

Location: Washington DC
Re: CR : Aircraft Safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2008, 10:32
Kudos to billyjeans. I think that the perfect explaination why not A.

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Aircraft Safety [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2008, 11:05
B.

It can't be A because that affects future airplane purchases. If airlines didn't make any future airline purchases, then nothing would improve.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Aircraft Safety   [#permalink] 01 May 2008, 11:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The number of aircraft collisions on the ground is

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.