GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 13 Nov 2019, 12:52

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium dummies

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 348
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Haas EWMBA '17
The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jan 2013, 15:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (02:01) correct 28% (02:10) wrong based on 442 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium dummies in crash testing published last year in consumer magazines was considerably lower relative to prior years. No longer manufactured, these dummies can be severely damaged in crash tests and many of the sensatorium dummies damaged two years ago are still awaiting necessary repairs. It is clear, therefore, that the lower number of consumer magazine articles published last year about sensatorium dummies was due to the decline in their availability for use.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the news reporter's argument?

(A) All articles about crash tests involving sensatorium dummies that were submitted for publication last year were published.
(B) The average time that crash test managers must wait to use a sensatorium dummy has increased over the past few years.
(C) The number of consumer magazines on the market was the same last year as in prior years.
(D) Sensatorium dummies cannot be utilized for more than one cycle of crash tests in a given year.
(E) Responding to competition, most consumer magazines began last year by introducing a new format limiting their former emphasis on crash test articles.

_________________
Thanks,
Prashant Ponde

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
Reading Comprehension notes: Click here
VOTE GMAT Practice Tests: Vote Here
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here
Finance your Student loan through SoFi and get $100 referral bonus : Click here
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 May 2012
Posts: 60
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Re: Use of sensatorium dummies in crash testing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2013, 05:33
3
E is the correct answer..

the argument says that the availability of dummies is the main reason for less no of publications

so to weaken it we can show an alternate cause for the desired effect

E provide just that.. if magazines have changed preferences.. thats the reason.. so it weakens the most among the 5 choices provided


PS:Please consider kudos if it helped u
Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 625
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium dummies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2014, 13:09
E seems best: Responding to competition, most consumer magazines began last year by introducing a new format limiting their former emphasis on crash test articles

reasoning: to weaken a causal reasoning, it is best to to provide an alternate reason. E does exactly that!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2012
Posts: 60
Re: The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium dummies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2014, 04:49
Why not option 'D'? 'D' suggests that the dummies were used only once per cycle of crash test -> which implies that since the overuse of the dummies was avoided they could have been re-used this year? The argument says that many are not in a shape that they could be re-used, but what about the rest of the used dummies?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Posts: 119
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium dummies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2014, 08:00
p2bhokie wrote:
Why not option 'D'? 'D' suggests that the dummies were used only once per cycle of crash test -> which implies that since the overuse of the dummies was avoided they could have been re-used this year? The argument says that many are not in a shape that they could be re-used, but what about the rest of the used dummies?


Great point p2bhokie!

The way I interpreted this question, I still chose E because it makes the number of dummies available in the world an irrelevant factor to the number of articles published (even if there were millions of dummies, the magazines chose to stop writing about them). Because it attacks the root assumption of the argument, I thought it "most seriously" weakens the argument.

The flaw in logic being attacked here is correlation/causation. The argument assumes that because there are fewer dummies and fewer articles that there must be a correlation between quantities and coverage.

Not related, but this reminds me of a real-world example: 1 ebola case in Dallas gets a thousand published articles, whereas thousands of ebola cases in Africa get significantly less coverage.
VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1490
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium dummies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Dec 2017, 13:44
this question and E are the common and important pattern in gmat.
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 542
Location: France
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium dummies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2018, 21:53
The words "most seriously weakens" indicate that this is a Weaken question. The correct answer will make it less likely that the conclusion follows from the stated evidence.

The reporter concludes that the short supply of dummies is the reason for the lower number of magazine articles published about the dummies. His evidence is simply an observed correlation: there aren't as many sensatorium dummies available lately, and fewer consumer magazine articles were published last year about the dummies.

The author is assuming there is no other explanation for the lower number of magazine articles. A GMAT argument is weakened by a choice that attacks the assumption. Here, the correct choice will suggest some other reason for the lower number of magazine articles besides the short supply of dummies.

(E) is correct, suggesting some other reason for the lower number of magazine articles, and therefore attacking the author's assumption. A magazine format change is the reason for fewer articles on crash tests, not the number of dummies being used.

(A) is incorrect because the argument is about why a lower number of articles were published, not submitted for publication. (A) doesn't indicate whether the magazines wanted more articles about dummies submitted or whether they would have published more articles about dummies had they been submitted. Without more information, (A) says nothing about the reason there were fewer articles published.

(B) just elaborates on the evidence that the dummies are in short supply. But it doesn't make a connection with the number of articles published.

(C) is a 180, since it gets rid of a potential alternative explanation. Had the number of magazines on the market decreased, that could have explained the lower number of articles published last year on the dummies. Since the number of magazines did not decrease, the reporter's explanation is at least a little more likely to be correct.

(D) doesn't affect the argument, because it has nothing to do with why there would be a drop in articles last year and not in previous years. The fact about the dummies described in (D) applied in previous years as well.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…

There is perfect timing for
everything and everyone.
Never doubt, But Work on
improving yourself,
Keep the faith and
Stay ready. When it’s
finally your turn,
It will all make sense.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 6623
Re: The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2019, 21:39
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium   [#permalink] 26 Sep 2019, 21:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The number of articles concerning the use of sensatorium dummies

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne