The number of young adults that are illiterate has dropped significantly in a certain county over the last fifteen years. Education officials attribute this decrease entirely to improved conditions in the schools, which made for a better teaching environment, reducing the level of illiteracy.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the education officials' explanation?
conclusion : improved conditions in the schools= better teaching environment= number of illiterates reduced
underlying assumption: No other factors caused the number of illeterates to reduce!!
we can weaken the argument by showing that there are other factors involved!
A. Many similar improvements in school conditions have been made over the last twenty-five years in the county.- good! how does this weaken the argument but??-
wrong!!B. Home-schooling has not been more prevalent among the illiterate as compared to people who are not illiterate.- lets consider the two scenarios:
1)homeschooling is more prevalent among the illiterate- imagine a total of 2 illiterate students and 1 literate student- this is not a strong argument
2)homeschooling is not more prevalent among the illiterate- this does nothing to the option-
wrong!C. Because of a new assessment scale, many people who until this year would have been considered illiterate are now considered low-level readers.-
]CORRECT!the reason there is a drop is because of a new assessment scale and not because of improved school conditions!- new factor!
D. The same percentage of the population has been tested every year for the last 30 years.- since we are talking about the number of illiterates!- percentage is out of scope-
wrong!E. The conditions in the schools were brought up to the standards of the neighbouring counties twenty years ago- neighbouring countries is out of scope-
wrong! _________________
Persistence and determination alone are all-powerful ~ :)