It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 01:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 409

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2005, 22:50
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a companyâ€™s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.
(A) that a companyâ€™s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse
(B) that a companyâ€™s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even
(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse
(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse
(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even.

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 38

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2005, 23:54
D

A is clearly wrong
B wrong very "be"
C wrong pronoun "a company...., they"
E wrong pronoung "who" and wrong "the refusal"

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1883

Kudos [?]: 394 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2005, 00:11
B for keeping the subjunctive structure : advise that X be/ bare-infinitive .....
B uses " such", which makes the sentence more concise.

Kudos [?]: 394 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2005, 05:00
This is a subjunctive mood question. That...to be is the correct structure. They in D has no clear referent.

B is much more succint than A.

My guess is B also.

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3345

Kudos [?]: 325 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2005, 09:45
I was going with A, though still thinking of B and Lex and GMAT773 make it quite clear...

B it is..

Kudos [?]: 325 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Somewhere

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2005, 01:36
B for me too...

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1111

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2005, 03:03
B for me

it was between A and B
Betwen "like" and "such" : the stem provides a clear example at the begining so "such" seems logical.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2005, 08:27
IMO, this sentence requires subjunctive mood so there are only choice A & B to consider. B distort the meaning so I vote for A

Cheers

TN

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2005, 18:48
Another for D

IMO ; it is between B and D

B though sounds very well trips on - to refuse <infinitive ?> even ...

D is idiomatically valid - refuse to and grammatically consistent.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 409

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 14:30
OA is B

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2734

Kudos [?]: 1087 [0], given: 4

Location: New York City

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2007, 18:41
gmacvik wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a companyâ€™s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse
split infinitive

(B) that a company's first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even.

Many business consultants therefore advise that a company's first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

Many business consultants therefore advise that (a company's first line of defense in eluding such offers) be to refuse even to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

Kudos [?]: 1087 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 264

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2007, 17:45
B is correct, as advise should be followed hence be must be used.

bmwhype, what do u mean by split infinitive?? I had a little tough time chosing between A and B, but chose B, as Such is the more preferred usage in gmat to provide instances....your thoughts???

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

23 Jul 2007, 17:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.