It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 19:20

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2008, 20:48
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

A. that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

B. that a company's first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

C. a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

D. companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

E. that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2008, 21:06
farend - do you agree with the usage of "like" in A ?

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 112

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2008, 21:23
bsd_lover wrote:
farend - do you agree with the usage of "like" in A ?


I would have preferred "such as".
But I still went with A....the lesser evil

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 67

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2008, 21:34
bsd_lover wrote:
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

A. that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

B. that a company's first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

C. a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

D. companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

E. that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even



Hi bsd_lover,
dont you think that b has a split infinitive problem:refuse even to
it should be refuse to

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2008, 21:38
rohit - there are plenty of subtleties in all the options here - to be honest I don't even know why the OA is the OA.

One thing that I can tell everyone is that the usage of like is incorrect and this eliminates A and E straight away.

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 86

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2008, 00:37
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

A. that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

B. that a company's first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

C. a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

D. companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse
E. that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even


i agree bsd that A and E can be eliminated cos of the 'like' factor.
in C the part in bold is not in symmetry with the preceeding part..
D lacks ||lism acc. to me..

i go with B as the term such talks specifically about offers like "takeovers" as mentioned in the statement

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 685

Kudos [?]: 600 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2008, 00:43
B sounds the best to me -> such offers is the right usage all others look bad.
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Kudos [?]: 600 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2008, 00:58
How about the usage of "be" in B ? Is that an idiom ?

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 504

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2008, 01:10
In A, E like is incorrect. it should be "such as"

In C, "they" is an wrong pronoun. It should be it

In D, which is wrong.

This leaves us with B.

B should be the correct answer

Last edited by bhatiagp on 13 May 2008, 01:13, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1884

Kudos [?]: 1396 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2008, 01:11
bsd_lover wrote:
How about the usage of "be" in B ? Is that an idiom ?


"advise that ....be..."

"is to refuse" is the highly formal form of "will refuse", no, say that, it is formal, polite to say what can be happen in the future!
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1396 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 211 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2008, 01:18
>>How about the usage of "be" in B ? Is that an idiom ?

"be" in B is subjunctive, isn't it

Kudos [?]: 211 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2008, 01:39
OA is B.

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 210

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 112

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - takeover [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2008, 04:02
So the lesser evil turns out to be the bigger one.
"Split infinitive" has to weigh down in favour of "as vs like". :?

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - takeover   [#permalink] 13 May 2008, 04:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.