GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Oct 2018, 20:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4479
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2017, 21:41
Top Contributor
Look at choice B, the OA in this official question, approving " of experiments investigating".
Does GMAT consider this 'prepostion+noun+verbing" as such a generally incorrect structure as you have indicated? Or is it more contextual or meaning based? For example, one might argue as to how experiments can investigate as only interpreters or analysts can do that. However, if GMAT could accept it, why shouldn't we?
Incidentally, is there any specific reason for calling the said structure as incorrect?
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1709
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2017, 16:39
daagh wrote:
Look at choice B, the OA in this official question, approving " of experiments investigating".
Does GMAT consider this 'prepostion+noun+verbing" as such a generally incorrect structure as you have indicated? Or is it more contextual or meaning based? For example, one might argue as to how experiments can investigate as only interpreters or analysts can do that. However, if GMAT could accept it, why shouldn't we?
Incidentally, is there any specific reason for calling the said structure as incorrect?


https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idio ... nsequence/, according to Magoosh, the rule in the picture file should work.

Also, according to Kaplan, test takers should avoid V-ing as much as possible.
Attachments

magoosh.JPG
magoosh.JPG [ 41.18 KiB | Viewed 423 times ]

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4479
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2017, 06:03
1
Top Contributor
With specific reference to the structure ' preposition +noun+ verbing' --Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect

(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect

(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting

(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B

Here is yet another official question that deviates from the perception, probably as an exception.

<https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-week-local-shrimpers-held-a-news-conference-to-take-some-credit-f-76039.html>
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 15
Location: Oman
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2018, 13:33
Can someone please explain when is it appropriate to use 'with'? Some examples will help. Thanks.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Location: India
Schools: XLRI (A)
GPA: 2.83
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2018, 18:24
carrillo1228 wrote:
Added an image of how I'm studying the structure in a word document. Figured it may help some.





Thanks even I read it exactly the way you have also mentioned here.....I initially marked it wrongly, after re-looking at the sentence I realized that it was an easy one.....

By parallel to By
With parallel to With
-ing parallel to -ing......

Good question.....
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Jan 2017
Posts: 28
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2018, 05:13
DanishHasan wrote:
Can someone please explain when is it appropriate to use 'with'? Some examples will help. Thanks.


The paradox of the Roman empire’s history is marked by the fall of the western part around the 5th century A.D, with several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and breaking into independent kingdoms, and by [...] .

"with several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and breaking into independent kingdoms" -- absolute participle clause (APC) which play an adverbial role from grammatical point of view. You may replace this adverbial clause with another one as I did below.

The paradox of the Roman empire’s history is marked by the fall of the western part around the 5th century A.D because several regions were succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and breaking into independent kingdoms and by [...] .

APC is basically used in literature/officials, not in spoken language.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 287
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2018, 02:12
my doubt is regarding the WITH+ NOUN +PARTICPLE structure , i thinks its wrong in here,

https://magoosh.com/gmat/2015/with-noun ... orrection/
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 213
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2018, 03:03
I am really bewildered seeing D as correct choice because what I have learnt from official sources is that with+noun+participle is wrong. Then how D could be correct choice.

Please elaborate.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the &nbs [#permalink] 29 Aug 2018, 03:03

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 28 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.