GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Oct 2019, 15:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5100
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2017, 21:41
Top Contributor
Look at choice B, the OA in this official question, approving " of experiments investigating".
Does GMAT consider this 'prepostion+noun+verbing" as such a generally incorrect structure as you have indicated? Or is it more contextual or meaning based? For example, one might argue as to how experiments can investigate as only interpreters or analysts can do that. However, if GMAT could accept it, why shouldn't we?
Incidentally, is there any specific reason for calling the said structure as incorrect?
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't make out how to pole-vault over the 630-barrier, you can do so with my one-to-one lessons. (+919884544509)
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1492
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Nov 2017, 16:39
daagh wrote:
Look at choice B, the OA in this official question, approving " of experiments investigating".
Does GMAT consider this 'prepostion+noun+verbing" as such a generally incorrect structure as you have indicated? Or is it more contextual or meaning based? For example, one might argue as to how experiments can investigate as only interpreters or analysts can do that. However, if GMAT could accept it, why shouldn't we?
Incidentally, is there any specific reason for calling the said structure as incorrect?

https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idio ... nsequence/, according to Magoosh, the rule in the picture file should work.

Also, according to Kaplan, test takers should avoid V-ing as much as possible.
Attachments

magoosh.JPG [ 41.18 KiB | Viewed 815 times ]

Retired Moderator
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5100
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2017, 06:03
1
Top Contributor
With specific reference to the structure ' preposition +noun+ verbing' --Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect

(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect

(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting

(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B

Here is yet another official question that deviates from the perception, probably as an exception.

<https://gmatclub.com/forum/last-week-local-shrimpers-held-a-news-conference-to-take-some-credit-f-76039.html>
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't make out how to pole-vault over the 630-barrier, you can do so with my one-to-one lessons. (+919884544509)
Intern
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 17
Location: Oman
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2018, 13:33
Can someone please explain when is it appropriate to use 'with'? Some examples will help. Thanks.
Intern
Joined: 21 Oct 2009
Posts: 12
Location: India
Schools: XLRI (A)
GPA: 2.83
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2018, 18:24
carrillo1228 wrote:
Added an image of how I'm studying the structure in a word document. Figured it may help some.

Thanks even I read it exactly the way you have also mentioned here.....I initially marked it wrongly, after re-looking at the sentence I realized that it was an easy one.....

By parallel to By
With parallel to With
-ing parallel to -ing......

Good question.....
Intern
Joined: 13 Jan 2017
Posts: 34
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2018, 05:13
DanishHasan wrote:
Can someone please explain when is it appropriate to use 'with'? Some examples will help. Thanks.

The paradox of the Roman empire’s history is marked by the fall of the western part around the 5th century A.D, with several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and breaking into independent kingdoms, and by [...] .

"with several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and breaking into independent kingdoms" -- absolute participle clause (APC) which play an adverbial role from grammatical point of view. You may replace this adverbial clause with another one as I did below.

The paradox of the Roman empire’s history is marked by the fall of the western part around the 5th century A.D because several regions were succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and breaking into independent kingdoms and by [...] .

APC is basically used in literature/officials, not in spoken language.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 317
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2018, 02:12
my doubt is regarding the WITH+ NOUN +PARTICPLE structure , i thinks its wrong in here,

https://magoosh.com/gmat/2015/with-noun ... orrection/
Director
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 500
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2018, 03:03
I am really bewildered seeing D as correct choice because what I have learnt from official sources is that with+noun+participle is wrong. Then how D could be correct choice.

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5930
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2019, 12:53
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: The paradox of the Roman empires history is marked by the   [#permalink] 31 Aug 2019, 12:53

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 29 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by