It is currently 25 Jun 2017, 08:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 167
WE: Design (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2013, 03:34
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

86% (03:13) correct 14% (04:12) wrong based on 21

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

35% (01:43) correct 65% (00:43) wrong based on 20

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

63% (01:41) correct 37% (00:28) wrong based on 19

HideShow timer Statistics

The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008, of the $700 billion financial-sector rescue plan is the latest in a long history of U.S. government bailouts, dating back to the Panic of 1792. It also marked the fourth time in 2008 that the government interceded to prevent the ruin of a private enterprise or the entire financial sector. Many experts assert that the perceived catastrophic effect of financial sector ruin justifies this bailout. However, this assertion overstates the long-term financial benefits of such a policy.
Such an assertion ignores fiscal and market realities. Federal politicians have granted themselves the ability to prevent companies from failing on the subjective, predictive assertion that to do otherwise would lead to economic turmoil. It is precisely because of such bailouts (and other government-sponsored economic interventions) that the United States has experienced such economic turmoil in the first place. The champions of interventionism fail to realize that their program implies the establishment of full government supremacy in all economic matters and ultimately brings about a state of affairs that threatens a sustainable free-market economy. If it is in the jurisdiction of the government to decide whether conditions of the economy justify government intervention, no sphere of operation is left to the market. Interventionist theory thus relies on a somewhat distorted picture of reality.
Interventionist doctrine implies that the market is free as long as it performs precisely as the government intends. Thus, the theory and the practice of interventionism ultimately tend to abandon the principles that originally distinguished the free enterprise system from systems largely based on central planning, such as the former Soviet economy. In a truly free market, financial sector entities should be allowed to succeed or fail based on individual merit. The current planned use of public monies to save companies with questionable balance sheets, ethics, and business practices, may work in the short run, but the ultimate long-term result will be one of financial insolvency.
1.The author of the passage is primarily concerned with
A. substantiating a claim about a historical event
B. reconciling two opposing ideas about a recent policy decision
C. disputing evidence the government uses to support legislation
D. analyzing two approaches to private-sector bailouts and evaluating their methodologies
E. criticizing a particular decision and the approach to fiscal policy it represents

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E

2.It can be inferred from the passage that the author of the passage considers “central planning” (see underlined text) to be
A. already included in most conceptions of interventionism
B. based on free-market fiscal policy
C. an alternative to interventionism
D. a historical mistake not to be repeated
E. a new approach to economic problems

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

3.The author would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
A. Interventionism gives the government greater power than is generally acknowledged.
B. An economy that involves frequent use of private-sector bailouts can still be described as a free market.
C. The government was justified when it bailed out the states in order to ease the Panic of 1792.
D. Companies with questionable balance sheets will, without government assistance, almost always fail.
E. Government supremacy is preferable to a state of affairs where the failure of one firm may lead to the failure of many other firms.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA

_________________

Kaustubh

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Posts: 29
Schools: ISB '16
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2013, 03:22
A C D..

I think these are correct answers
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 176
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
WE: Business Development (Internet and New Media)
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2013, 05:17
Source? Debatable answers.. Especially 2 and 3
_________________

You've been walking the ocean's edge, holding up your robes to keep them dry. You must dive naked under, and deeper under, a thousand times deeper! - Rumi

http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index.php/author/cbermanmanhattanprep-com/ - This is worth its weight in gold

Economist GMAT Test - 730, Q50, V41 Aug 9th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 670, Q45, V36 Aug 11th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 680, Q47, V36 Aug 17th, 2013
GmatPrep CAT 1 - 770, Q50, V44 Aug 24th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 690, Q45, V39 Aug 30th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 710, Q48, V39 Sep 13th, 2013
GmatPrep CAT 2 - 740, Q49, V41 Oct 6th, 2013

GMAT - 770, Q50, V44, Oct 7th, 2013
My Debrief - http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-the-ashes-thou-shall-rise-770-q-50-v-44-awa-5-ir-162299.html#p1284542

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 167
WE: Design (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2013, 12:17
The question is from 800score verbal tests.
I too went wrong with 2 and 3....
_________________

Kaustubh

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 131
Location: India
GPA: 3.96
WE: Research (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
CAT Tests
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2013, 14:29
I think It shud be A C C... I really doubt the OA!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 199
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2013, 02:08
i think its E A D ... The OAs for 2 & 3 are not convincing ...
Expert Post
Math Expert
User avatar
D
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39672
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2014, 10:59
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Mar 2014
Posts: 9
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2014, 01:49
How is D correct for Question 2 ?

No where is the passage is mentioned that Central Planning was a Mistake made earlier!. Please guide.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 2
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2014, 20:55
The OA for Question 3 is particularly debatable as the author says "financial sector entities should be allowed to succeed or fail based on individual merit." So if the case of individual merit applies to companies in the private sector, shouldn't balance sheet cheating companies fail w/o govt. intervention?
Chat Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 697
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2015, 11:08
Nice passage. Answered all correctly.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 55
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2015, 20:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
3.The author would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
A. Interventionism gives the government greater power than is generally acknowledged.
"The champions of interventionism fail to realize that their program implies the establishment of full government supremacy in all economic matters and ultimately brings about a state of affairs that threatens a sustainable free-market economy."

2.It can be inferred from the passage that the author of the passage considers “central planning” (see underlined text) to be
D. a historical mistake not to be repeated
"interventionism ultimately tend to abandon the principles that originally distinguished the free enterprise system from systems largely based on central planning, such as the former Soviet economy."

1.The author of the passage is primarily concerned with:
E. criticizing a particular decision and the approach to fiscal policy it represents.
the first passage told about the bailouts in 2008 and 1792 and a drawback of these decision "this assertion overstates the long-term financial benefits of such a policy."
The second passage described how these decisions have negative impacts on the economics and change the theory of free market. Finally, the authors said that it is good for the short-term but harmful in the long-term.
Re: The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008   [#permalink] 22 Dec 2015, 20:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Similar to the Maize passage, the first paragraph of this passage is jkolachi 5 25 Jun 2017, 05:54
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Long RC passage taking me 6-6.5 minutes. How to cut it to 3.5min? mkarthik1 5 26 Aug 2016, 10:44
21 9 RC Passages ctrlaltdel 12 11 May 2014, 00:05
2 Short passages in GMAT atomy 21 26 Jul 2015, 01:25
========== Passage 88 (3/15) Shaw's defense of a theater of nitya34 6 15 Feb 2016, 22:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The passage into U.S. law on October 3, 2008

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.