Quote:
1. The main purpose of the passage can be expressed most accurately by which of the following?
(A) To contrast the manner by which bacteria and viruses infect the human body and cause cellular damage
(B) To explain the operations by which viruses use cell machinery to propagate
(C) To argue for additional resources to combat drug-resistant bacteria and easily transmissible pathogenic viruses
(D) To highlight the good fortune experienced by the human race, in that the HIV pandemic has not been more lethal.
(E) To compare the relative dangers of two biological threats and judge one of them to be far more important.-
During review, it can be worth it to review the passage paragraph by paragraph. The first paragraph introduces bacterial "super-bugs" with some alarm. The second paragraph increases the alarm, noting how "many scientists argue that the human race has more to fear from viruses." This paragraph describes the way in which viruses hijack the cell, in order to illustrate how tough viruses are to treat. The last paragraph continues the comparison and puts a stake in the ground: "bacteria lack the potential for cataclysm that viruses have." This last point is illustrated by the "near-miss" we have had with the HIV pandemic.
(A) We are never told how bacteria infect the body. This is one way in which the two "bad guys" (bacteria and viruses) are not treated in parallel ways in the text. Again, the way in which viruses infect cells is described in order to show how hard it is to kill viruses.
(B) The hijacking process is certainly described, but to make a larger point: why it's hard to eradicate viruses, in comparison with bacteria.
(C) After reading this passage, you may want to call up the CDC and donate money, but the passage itself only raises a warning, if even that: it is not a call to action.
(D) The last paragraph does highlight our good fortune, but this is not the larger point of the whole passage.
(E) CORRECT. This passage compares the two threats (bacteria and viruses) and judges viruses to be far more important (after all, viruses have the "potential for cataclysm")
Ans :EQuote:
2. It can be inferred from the passage that infections by bacteria
(A) result from asexual reproduction through binary fission -reproduction occurs this way,not the infection
(B) can be treated ex post facto by antimicrobial agents, unlike viral infections -Correct.Passage states:viral infections cannot be treated ex post facto in the same way as bacterial infections
(C) can be rendered vulnerable by a resistance cocktail such as NDM-1 -A resistance “cocktail” such as NDM-1 could bestow immunity to a bevy of preexisting drugs simultaneously, rendering the bacterium nearly impregnable. The statement is mentioned in passage.But again ,similar to A,does not talk about infection but something else.
(D) are rarely cured by currently available treatments, but rather only put into remission -Out of scope
(E) mirror those by viruses, in that they can both do critical damage to the host cell -Out of scope.
Ans:AQuote:
3. According to the passage, intracellular obligate parasites
(A) are unable to propagate themselves on their own
(B) assemble their components randomly out of virions
(C) reproduce themselves through sexual combination with host cells
(D) have become resistant to antibiotics through the overuse of these drugs
(E) construct necessary reproductive structures out of destroyed host cells
This Specific Detail question requires us to determine what is true about "intracellular obligate parasites" (or IOPs, to give them a temporary abbreviation). Going back to the passage, we read this: Whereas bacteria reproduce asexually through binary fission, viruses lack the necessary structures for reproduction, and so are known as “intracellular obligate parasites.” The word "so" toward the end tells us that the reason viruses are called IOPs is that they "lack the necessary structures for reproduction." We are looking for this idea, perhaps slightly restated.
(A) CORRECT. If we know that viruses "lack the necessary structures for reproduction," then we know that they cannot reproduce (or propagate themselves) on their own.Also it states :Virus particles called virions must marshal the host cell’s ribosomes, enzymes, and other cellular machinery in order to propagate.This also implies it propages using virions.
(B) What we are told about virions is that they are "virus particles" and that they "must marshal the host cell's... cellular machinery in order to propagate." However, we don't know that the viruses are themselves then assembled out of virions. Moreover, IOPs seem like a more general class of thing than viruses, and so we wouldn't be able to conclude that something true about viruses would necessarily be true of all IOPs.
(C) We know that bacteria reproduce themselves asexually, in contrast to how viruses do so, but that doesn't mean that viruses necessarily do so sexually.
(D) Certain bacteria have become resistant to antibiotics, but we don't know that this is true of IOPs.
(E) This choice mixes up language from the passage. Viruses need reproductive structures, and they destroy host cells, but that doesn't mean that they first structures, and they destroy host cells, but that doesn't mean that they first destroy the host cells, then make reproductive structures out of the carcasses. (In fact, what they do is hijack living host cells, taking over their cellular machinery.)
Ans: A.