TaN1213 wrote:
The political and social forces that may facilitate a dictator’s rise to power include
sudden crashes in the economy, discrimination and other methods of finding
scapegoats,
inciting the masses to rebellion, and their protesting that the current
government may still be inadequate.
(B)
inciting the masses to rebellion, and a protest that the current government may still be inadequate.
mikemcgarry Hello Mike,
Hope you're doing well. Please assist me with my query.
In spite of the comma before 'and', why can not the red part act as a modifier for the previous item of list -'discrimination....' , there by making the 'a protest..' third item of the list ? Where am I at fault in understanding the question the following way ?
The political and social forces that may facilitate a dictator’s rise to power include
1. sudden crashes in the economy
2. discrimination and other methods of finding scapegoats, inciting the masses to rebellion
3. a protest
Thank You.Dear
TaN1213,
Thank you for asking a very thoughtful and well-formulated question. I'm happy to respond.
Usually, the
MGMAT questions are superb--those people are brilliant! This one feels a little formulaic and unsatisfying. Typically, a good GMAT SC OA follows all the rules and is an incredibly well-written sentence. This one has an OA that, but in following the rules, it lands on something awkward.
The point you are raising is a legitimate issue in this question. Here's the thing, though. The word "
inciting" could be read as either the third element of four in parallel, or as the modifier of the second element of three in parallel. That's
ambiguity, and ambiguity is always wrong 100% of the time on the GMAT.
If we wanted to indicate clearly that "
inciting" modifies the second element, I think we would have to rearrange the sentence:
The political and social forces that may facilitate a dictator’s rise to power include sudden crashes in the economy, a protest that the current government may still be inadequate, and discrimination and other methods of finding scapegoats, separative techniques that incite the masses to rebel.
That version has no ambiguity, but it seems to have a meaning different from what the intelligent folks at
MGMAT intended.
I don't know. Choice (B) feels most natural, although I understand that this version doesn't follow the GMAT rules to the letter. Choice (E) is technically correct but screamingly awkward. I don't know. I find this questions unsatisfying, one of the exceedingly few
MGMAT questions that leaves me feeling this way.
Does all this make sense?
Mike