It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 10:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 20:37
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A)The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.

B)Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.

C)Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.

D)The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.

E)The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable.

I dont know how the answer couldn't be C. From C we get that even when the temperature goes above 95 for one day, a ring is lost. From the original sentence we dont know how long of a period is needed for a ring to decrease nor how many rings decrease per day when the temp is above 95.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: MGMAT RC spoiler [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 20:50
lionheart187 wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A)The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.

B)Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.

C)Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.

D)The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.

E)The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable.

I dont know how the answer couldn't be C. From C we get that even when the temperature goes above 95 for one day, a ring is lost. From the original sentence we dont know how long of a period is needed for a ring to decrease nor how many rings decrease per day when the temp is above 95.

I think you have fallen in the trap C. C does say that temperature >95 degree causes rings lost. But the argument do not say about the causality, but about the sign that WHEN above 95 degree, the rings lost. You have lured to the disdirection.! The trap made successfully! And count me in sometime!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 0

Re: MGMAT RC spoiler [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 21:47
is the answer A.

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Re: MGMAT RC spoiler [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 22:32
lionheart187 wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A)The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.

B)Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.

C)Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.

D)The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.

E)The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable.

I dont know how the answer couldn't be C. From C we get that even when the temperature goes above 95 for one day, a ring is lost. From the original sentence we dont know how long of a period is needed for a ring to decrease nor how many rings decrease per day when the temp is above 95.

My pick for this question would be E. i m just using the denial test on this one. what is the OA for this one .
_________________

The world is continuous, but the mind is discrete

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: MGMAT RC spoiler [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 06:08
OA is E

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: MGMAT RC spoiler   [#permalink] 10 Jun 2008, 06:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.