It is currently 14 Dec 2017, 13:09

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Wharton R1 | Stanford R1 | Tuck R1 | Ross R1 | Haas R1 | UCLA R1

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago,

Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

Show Tags

07 Sep 2005, 06:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago, first-class letter delivery cost only three cents. Since then, the price has increased nearly tenfold, with an actual decrease in the speed and reliability of service.

Each of the following statements, if true, would tend to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) The volume of mail handled by the postal service has increased dramatically over the last forty years.
(B) Unprecedented increases in the cost of fuel for trucks and planes have put severe upward pressures on postal delivery costs.
(C) Private delivery services usually charge more than does the postal service for comparable delivery charges.
(D) The average delivery time for a first-class letter four decades ago was actually slightly longer than it is today.
(E) The average level of consumer prices overall has increased more than 300 percent over the last forty years.

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 86

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

07 Sep 2005, 08:10
C?

a, b, e provide alternate causes for the postal services high cost or slow delivery (increased volume, higher costs or general inflation). D seems to indicate that the postal service is actually better than in the past.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 453

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

Show Tags

07 Sep 2005, 08:42

We need something that agrees (ie strengthen the argument) with the author.

A - volume has gone up (increasing time)
B - fuel has gone up (increasing price)
C - Fedex/UPS is more expensive
D - Avg 1st class time has improved
E - Consumer prices increased overall.

Next to each answer put a S for strengthn or a W for weaken.

A = W
B = W
C = ?
D = W
E = ?

We are left with C and E. E seems out of scope. W/ POE I chose C.

ywilfred wrote:
The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago, first-class letter delivery cost only three cents. Since then, the price has increased nearly tenfold, with an actual decrease in the speed and reliability of service.

Each of the following statements, if true, would tend to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) The volume of mail handled by the postal service has increased dramatically over the last forty years.
(B) Unprecedented increases in the cost of fuel for trucks and planes have put severe upward pressures on postal delivery costs.
(C) Private delivery services usually charge more than does the postal service for comparable delivery charges.
(D) The average delivery time for a first-class letter four decades ago was actually slightly longer than it is today.
(E) The average level of consumer prices overall has increased more than 300 percent over the last forty years.

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Location: Ghana

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 00:30
Between C and E, i will go for E.
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 26

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 06:21
I am on C

Rest of the choices weaken the statement

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 178

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 06:31
I wud go for C.

Its the only statement which doesnot have any comparision based on time.

Krishna

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1705

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 06:32
All except E. E actually support or strngthen the argument.

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 178

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 06:40
Hi Himalaya,

what makes you think that E strengthens the argument. Let me try to write down things:

Conclusion : Postal service is badly mismanaged.

Reason : Increase in the price of A class letter delivery and delay in service.

Assumption : Increase in price of the delivery is only due to mismanagement.

If we observe E, E says that over the past 40 years, the cost of living has increased 300 times.
Hence, there shud be an increase in the prices as well. Hence, from E, we can infer that the rise in the price of delivery is not due to mismanagement but due to incease in cost of living as such.
Hence, its weakening the argument.

Plz let me know if I'm wrong

Krishna

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 257

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Las Vegas, NV

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 09:49
C for me too. E also says more than 300 percent. There's a lot left to interpretation...I think

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 14:01
I will go with C as well.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 14:38
Definitely C. I've seen this one before.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 18:12
E.

Consumer prices up by 300%
Postal prices up by 1000%

So this supports the argument that the prices are higher than actual inflation supporting the argument.

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 278

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Location: CA, USA

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 20:12
E

for C
(C) Private delivery services usually charge more than does the postal service for comparable delivery charges.

=> Postal service is BETTER than private delivery services.

The point we are trying to weaken: The postal service is badly mismanaged.

So it does weaken the point, therefore disqualified.

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 20:45
I like E... I really don't see how C "strengthen" the argument, plus it sounds a little out of scope to me

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1705

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 21:37
crisnas wrote:
Hi Himalaya, what makes you think that E strengthens the argument.

if the inflation (the average level of consumer prices) has increased more than 300 percent over the last forty years, then it is reasonable to increase the the price of the postal serviceby 10 folds. in general, inflation is the measure of increase in consumer price level.

Quote:
The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago, first-class letter delivery cost only three cents. Since then, the price has increased nearly tenfold, with an actual decrease in the speed and reliability of service.

Each of the following statements, if true, would tend to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:
(E) The average level of consumer prices overall has increased more than 300 percent over the last forty years.

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

09 Sep 2005, 03:28
I will go with E.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 788

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Location: BULGARIA

Show Tags

09 Sep 2005, 05:53
the conclusion is that mail service is mismanaged. What strenghtens the argument is D) IMO

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 331

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

09 Sep 2005, 06:22
*LOL* That's funny, my first instinct was to say A.

After all, an increase in volume to a certain point should decrease prices by increasing economies of scale, right?

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1111

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 0

Location: CA

Show Tags

09 Sep 2005, 09:35

C: just says Private delivery services are also mis-managed (in terms of increased pricing). This does not have any impact of Mismanagement at "The postal office" referred in argument.

E. Weaken as hinting another possible reason (other than mismanagement) for service price rise.

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

Show Tags

10 Sep 2005, 04:29
OA is E.

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

10 Sep 2005, 04:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago,

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.