It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 19:09

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago,

Author Message
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 08:22
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago, first-class letter delivery cost only three cents. Since then, the price has increased nearly tenfold, with an actual decrease in the speed and reliability of service.
Each of the following statements, if true, would tend to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) The volume of mail handled by the postal service has increased dramatically over the last forty years.
(B) Unprecedented increases in the cost of fuel for trucks and planes have put severe upward pressures on postal delivery costs.
(C) Private delivery services usually charge more than does the postal service for comparable delivery charges.
(D) The average delivery time for a first-class letter four decades ago was actually slightly longer than it is today.
(E) The average level of consumer prices overall has increased more than 300 percent over the last forty years.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 08:52
C is my answer. It seems to be out of scope so it does't really weaken the argument.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 700

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 09:35
Yes C

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 161

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 10:06
One more C

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 432

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 11:05
One more C

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 12:22
ak_idc wrote:
The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago, first-class letter delivery cost only three cents. Since then, the price has increased nearly tenfold, with an actual decrease in the speed and reliability of service.
Each of the following statements, if true, would tend to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) The volume of mail handled by the postal service has increased dramatically over the last forty years.
(B) Unprecedented increases in the cost of fuel for trucks and planes have put severe upward pressures on postal delivery costs.
(C) Private delivery services usually charge more than does the postal service for comparable delivery charges.
(D) The average delivery time for a first-class letter four decades ago was actually slightly longer than it is today.
(E) The average level of consumer prices overall has increased more than 300 percent over the last forty years.

D for me.

C actually weakens the argument by saying that the Postal Deliv service is NOT so costly after all because the Pvt ones are even costlier.

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 22:52
C from me.
Comparision between private delivery services and postal services is outside the scope of the argument.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 23:24
C for me.

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 89

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 12:17
C for me 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 734

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 12:51
C or E

I prefer E because even though average inflation is about 3 fold postal office went up 10 fold.

E

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 21:55
dwivedys wrote:
ak_idc wrote:
The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago, first-class letter delivery cost only three cents. Since then, the price has increased nearly tenfold, with an actual decrease in the speed and reliability of service.
Each of the following statements, if true, would tend to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) The volume of mail handled by the postal service has increased dramatically over the last forty years.
(B) Unprecedented increases in the cost of fuel for trucks and planes have put severe upward pressures on postal delivery costs.
(C) Private delivery services usually charge more than does the postal service for comparable delivery charges.
(D) The average delivery time for a first-class letter four decades ago was actually slightly longer than it is today.
(E) The average level of consumer prices overall has increased more than 300 percent over the last forty years.

D for me.

C actually weakens the argument by saying that the Postal Deliv service is NOT so costly after all because the Pvt ones are even costlier.

Battling b/w C and D. Went with D for the same reasons mentioned above. Eager to see the OA

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 21:56
dwivedys wrote:
ak_idc wrote:
The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago, first-class letter delivery cost only three cents. Since then, the price has increased nearly tenfold, with an actual decrease in the speed and reliability of service.
Each of the following statements, if true, would tend to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) The volume of mail handled by the postal service has increased dramatically over the last forty years.
(B) Unprecedented increases in the cost of fuel for trucks and planes have put severe upward pressures on postal delivery costs.
(C) Private delivery services usually charge more than does the postal service for comparable delivery charges.
(D) The average delivery time for a first-class letter four decades ago was actually slightly longer than it is today.
(E) The average level of consumer prices overall has increased more than 300 percent over the last forty years.

D for me.

C actually weakens the argument by saying that the Postal Deliv service is NOT so costly after all because the Pvt ones are even costlier.

Battling b/w C and D. Went with D for the same reasons mentioned above. Eager to see the OA

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 06:09
Even I marked C. But the OA is E.

Possible reasons:

In C we are comparing apples to oranges.

E is perhaps talking abt the main issue. That is price. The consumer prices increased by only 300%. Where as postal service prices increased 10 times. This shows that postal services are mismanaged.

E is not weakening conclusion in the argument. No?

I am not happy with my reasons, however

Sorry Guys..No OE. I found this question in CR 1000.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

02 Nov 2006, 18:56
it is an except question, so I think C is a better answer.

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

Show Tags

03 Nov 2006, 16:19
Guys...The OA is wrong in this case. Ans HAS to be C, not E.

In our question:
increase in postal rates(10 fold) < increase in other consumer prices(300 fold).
Thus, postal services are NOT mismanaged => argument IS weakened. OUT

I found a very simillar question here:
http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=14630&sid=d8dff3b00feb756a2344e137a06f2bf6
Look at the numbers for the price increase very carefully.
Here:
increase in postal rates (7 fold) > increase in other consumer prices (4 fold)
Thus, postal services ARE mismanaged => argument is NOT weakened.
In this case, it's the right answer.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

03 Nov 2006, 16:22
kripalkavi wrote:
Guys...The OA is wrong in this case. Ans HAS to be C, not E.

In our question:
increase in postal rates(10 fold) < increase in other consumer prices(300 fold).
Thus, postal services are NOT mismanaged => argument IS weakened. OUT

I found a very simillar question here:
http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=14630&sid=d8dff3b00feb756a2344e137a06f2bf6
Look at the numbers for the price increase very carefully.
Here:
increase in postal rates (7 fold) > increase in other consumer prices (4 fold)
Thus, postal services ARE mismanaged => argument is NOT weakened.
In this case, it's the right answer.

Kripal, it is 3 fold

So anwer is E.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

Show Tags

03 Nov 2006, 16:32
ak_idc wrote:
kripalkavi wrote:
Guys...The OA is wrong in this case. Ans HAS to be C, not E.

In our question:
increase in postal rates(10 fold) < increase in other consumer prices(300 fold).
Thus, postal services are NOT mismanaged => argument IS weakened. OUT

I found a very simillar question here:
http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=14630&sid=d8dff3b00feb756a2344e137a06f2bf6
Look at the numbers for the price increase very carefully.
Here:
increase in postal rates (7 fold) > increase in other consumer prices (4 fold)
Thus, postal services ARE mismanaged => argument is NOT weakened.
In this case, it's the right answer.

Kripal, it is 3 fold

So anwer is E.

Shoot! all my painstaking research down the drain! Really should read more closely. Thanks ak_idc

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

04 Nov 2006, 12:53
should be E....

Though postal charges increased 10 fold which is 900% compared to 300% increase in the standard of living the service levels didnt pick up as much to justify the steep increase in postal services over the years

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

04 Nov 2006, 12:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago,

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.