It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 09:21

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is

Author Message
Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 584

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Jun 2005, 19:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

24. The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is the following: people making economic decisions cannot readily compare environmental factors, such as clean air and the survival of endangered species, with other costs and benefits. As environmental economists recognize, solving this problem requires assigning monetary values to environmental factors. But monetary values result from people comparing costs and benefits in order to arrive at economic decisions. Thus, environmental economics is stymied by what motivates it.
If the considerations advanced in its support are true, the passageâ€™s conclusion is supported

(A) strongly, on the assumption that monetary values for environment factors cannot be assigned unless people make economic decisions about these factors
(B) strongly, unless economic decision-making has not yet had any effect on the things categorized as environmental factors
(C) at best weakly, because the passage fails to establish that economic decision-makers do not by and large take adequate account of environmental factors
(D) at best weakly, because the argument assumes that pollution and other effects on environmental factors rarely result from economic decision-making
(E) not at all, since the argument is circular, taking that conclusion as one of its premises

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

 Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes EMPOWERgmat Discount Codes
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: Atlanta , GA

Show Tags

19 Jun 2005, 19:29
C???

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 270

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Show Tags

20 Jun 2005, 01:49
i'd pick A

i think...

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 555

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

20 Jun 2005, 09:26
assumption question.
looks like (A) to me also.

If the assumption that monetary values for environment factors cannot be assigned unless people make economic decisions about these factors is made, then the conclusion holds.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 584

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

24 Jun 2005, 21:19
The OA is A.

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.