Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 02:55

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 214
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 221 [2] , given: 56

The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2012, 03:16
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (02:21) correct 34% (01:38) wrong based on 287 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987. If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.
The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987.
(B) The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987.
(C) Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the country.
(D) The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987.
(E) A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2011
Posts: 82
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GMAT Date: 09-08-2012
GPA: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 2

Re: program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the count [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2012, 15:22
E.

We are assuming there was no other reason for the drop in prices.
_________________

Thanks = +1 Kudos

Study from reliable sources!!

Thursdays with Ron: http://www.manhattangmat.com/thursdays-with-ron.cfm

Gmat Prep Questions:
CR http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmatprepsc-105446.html
SC http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmatprepsc-105446.html

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10372
Followers: 997

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2013, 23:16
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Posts: 67
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 6

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2013, 23:37
The tricky one...oofffffff
Conclusion: Price has dropped because of failure of the program. Means illegal drugs are coming in the market. off-course if supply will be high price will be low.

The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987. - this is opposite of premise.

(B) The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987. - this is already mentioned, no new information.

(C) Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the country. - A trap: the comparison is of no use. it may be 10% and 11% or 90% or 91%.

(D) The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987. - only few drugs, how about most of the drugs?

(E) A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price. - here it is, demand is not the only cause, you are right because supply is the cause.

Hope this helps!
CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2501
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 341 [0], given: 167

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2016, 20:53
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987. If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.
The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987.
(B) The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987.
(C) Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the country.
(D) The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987.
(E) A drop in demand for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price.

the program was a failure.
as a result, we are told that the price of most illegal drugs dropped substantially.

the argument makes a leap of faith, which is very vulnerable to critics. it states that the increased supply caused the drop in price.
we would thus need to look at an answer choice that would strengthen the argument while protecting it from any weakeners.
A possible weakener - price went down because the demand went down. Another one - price went down because the domestic production of drugs went up.
thus, an correct answer choice would provide information that the above is not true.

A - if the supply dropped, then the price would have increased. so no.
B - tricky but not. if negated, doesn't help much to weaken the argument. on the contrary, negated statements supports the argument. here the DID NOT - makes the answer choice incorrect.
C. just like B - this one is a weakener. negated answer would rather support the argument than weaken.
D. "of a few" makes this one incorrect. furthermore, it looks more like a weakener.
E. aha! so it was not the decreased demand that sent prices plunging.
Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Posts: 63
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 6

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2016, 04:05
E is a direct assumption without which the argument won't hold.
_________________

In the pursuit of a better GMAT score. You can help me by giving me kudos if you like my post.

Re: The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the   [#permalink] 18 Feb 2016, 04:05
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the 2 31 Mar 2014, 12:26
1 Dr. Nash: Drug addiction/ abuse control programs that 5 20 May 2013, 14:23
The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the 4 10 Sep 2012, 04:09
10 The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the 8 28 Aug 2016, 21:46
2 As part of continuing efforts to control illegal 29 26 Aug 2016, 19:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by