It is currently 19 Sep 2017, 05:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2007, 00:39
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to decide its goal and then to plan the best way to accomplish that goal. Th U.S space station project does not conform to this ideal. when the cold war ended , the project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project, that of conducting linited gravity experiments, even though such experiments can be done in an alternative way. It is , therefore ,abundantly clear that the space station should not be built.

The reasoning in this argument is flawed because the argument

A. Attacks the proponents of a claim rather than arguing against the claim itself

B. Presupposes what it sets out to prove

C. Faults planners for not foreseeing a certain event, when in fact that event was not foreseeable

E. Concludes that a shortcoming is fatal, having produced evidence only of the existence of that shortcoming

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 4

Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2007, 03:06
AK47 wrote:
The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to decide its goal and then to plan the best way to accomplish that goal. Th U.S space station project does not conform to this ideal. when the cold war ended , the project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project, that of conducting linited gravity experiments, even though such experiments can be done in an alternative way. It is , therefore ,abundantly clear that the space station should not be built.

The reasoning in this argument is flawed because the argument

A. Attacks the proponents of a claim rather than arguing against the claim itself

B. Presupposes what it sets out to prove

C. Faults planners for not foreseeing a certain event, when in fact that event was not foreseeable

E. Concludes that a shortcoming is fatal, having produced evidence only of the existence of that shortcoming

I would go for D. Because, the argument says that "US space station planners should plan the best way to accomplish that goal". But the argument only says that "such experiments can be done in an alternative way". Alternative way is not the best way. Still the argument says that "abundantly clear that the space station should not be built". Dont you see some contradiction here??

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 4

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 744

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2007, 23:49
E !

"project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project" is the short coming and argument assumes this short coming is fatal.
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 0

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 4

Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2007, 03:56
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
E !

"project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project" is the short coming and argument assumes this short coming is fatal.

Your explanation is convincing. But I am still not fully clear why D is wrong.

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2007, 12:59
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
E !

"project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project" is the short coming and argument assumes this short coming is fatal.

Agree with the reasoning above.

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2007, 06:39
aurobindo,

it's not clear if the alternate way is better or not.so you can not "definitely" say that the statement leads to self contradiction.hence.choice D can be eliminated.

OA is E.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: cr-proper way   [#permalink] 02 Feb 2007, 06:39
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Q29)Scientific and technological discoveries have 8 13 May 2011, 03:15
Although there has been great scientific debate for decades 12 14 Sep 2008, 09:12
Scientific research will be properly channeled whenever 3 28 Jun 2008, 17:08
The true scientific significance of a group of unusual 2 13 Apr 2008, 04:32
Not convinced with OA :B ].Need proper explanation as to why 2 07 May 2011, 15:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by