The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Feb 2017, 20:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 585
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2005, 15:46
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

67% (00:00) correct 33% (03:27) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

19. The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely used as systematic tests of pharmaceutical innovations, to new surgical procedures should not be implemented. The point is that surgical procedures differ in one important respect from medicinal drugs: a correctly prescribed drug depends for its effectiveness only on the drugâ€™s composition, whereas the effectiveness of even the most appropriate surgical procedure is transparently related to the skills of the surgeon who uses it.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) does not consider that new surgical procedures might be found to be intrinsically more harmful than the best treatment previously available
(B) ignores the possibility that the challenged proposal is deliberately crude in a way designed to elicit criticism to be used in refining the proposal
(C) assumes that a surgeonâ€™s skills remain unchanged throughout the surgeonâ€™s professional life
(D) describes a dissimilarity without citing any scientific evidence for the existence of that dissimilarity
(E) rejects a proposal presumably advanced in good faith without acknowledging any such good faith
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 237
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2005, 19:36
WinWinMBA - who writes these CRs ?

I would go for D , the others dont look much related to the discussion.
SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: extend clinical trials [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2005, 21:04
I am divided between Aand C. But A seems more plausible.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2005, 02:23
C seems good to me
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 560
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2005, 03:28
i'm between (A) and (C), but i choose (C).
Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 725
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2005, 07:51
C looks good.

Infact C is only one that appears relevent to the argument.
Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2005, 08:28
D. All other options are out of scope.
Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 237
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2005, 21:47
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 272
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: extend clinical trials [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2005, 22:04
A seems fine...the proposal should not be dismissed as it could have a useful purpose (i.e. if a new procedure is harmful).
I dont even understand B and E in this context.
C is irrelevant because they dont mention anything about a surgeon's skills changing or not changing but just that a particular surgeon might not be skilled.
D is a bit tempting because there is dissimilarity mentioned but the reason given for it seems valid...not a hollow statement without any support

Director
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 548
Location: Canuckland
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2005, 03:52
A. here too, the keyword is intrinsically. Extended trials are needed to ensure safety of a drug or a procedure. Surgeon's skills are irrelevant.
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 954
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1277 [0], given: 40

Re: CR: extend clinical trials [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2010, 07:20
I marked D. Flaw questions are really challenging for me.
Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 196
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 11

Re: CR: extend clinical trials [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2010, 23:34
IMO C
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 6

Re: CR: extend clinical trials [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2010, 17:53
C for me.

If the trials cannot be extended to surgical procedures only because of the surgeon's skills then the argument is flawed because it is assuming that the surgeons skills remains same throughout his professional life.

What is the OA?
Intern
Joined: 20 May 2010
Posts: 25
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: extend clinical trials [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2010, 20:26
D
Re: CR: extend clinical trials   [#permalink] 23 Jun 2010, 20:26
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A journalist discovered that drugs whose clinical trials are financed 2 26 Aug 2015, 08:52
In clinical trials of new medicines, half of the subjects receive the 0 11 Dec 2014, 19:19
33 Editorial: In a compelling preponderance of clinical trials, 29 01 Nov 2013, 12:23
The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely 3 04 Jun 2010, 04:35
The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely 15 06 Apr 2007, 01:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by