It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 22:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA
The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2004, 20:39
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

19. The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely used as systematic tests of pharmaceutical innovations, to new surgical procedures should not be implemented. The point is that surgical procedures differ in one important respect from medicinal drugs: a correctly prescribed drug depends for its effectiveness only on the drug's composition, whereas the effectiveness of even the most appropriate surgical procedure is transparently related to the skills of the surgeon who uses it.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) does not consider that new surgical procedures might be found to be intrinsically more harmful than the best treatment previously available

(B) ignores the possibility that the challenged proposal is deliberately crude in a way designed to elicit criticism to be used in relining the proposal

(C) assumes that a surgeon's skills remain unchanged throughout the surgeon's professional life

(D) describes a dissimilarity without citing any scientific evidence for the existence of that dissimilarity

(E) rejects a proposal presumably advanced in good faith without acknowledging any such good faith .

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

Re: CR - New surgical procedures [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2004, 22:03
anandnk wrote:
19. The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely used as systematic tests of pharmaceutical innovations, to new surgical procedures should not be implemented. The point is that surgical procedures differ in one important respect from medicinal drugs: a correctly prescribed drug depends for its effectiveness only on the drug's composition, whereas the effectiveness of even the most appropriate surgical procedure is transparently related to the skills of the surgeon who uses it.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) does not consider that new surgical procedures might be found to be intrinsically more harmful than the best treatment previously available

(B) ignores the possibility that the challenged proposal is deliberately crude in a way designed to elicit criticism to be used in relining the proposal

(C) assumes that a surgeon's skills remain unchanged throughout the surgeon's professional life

(D) describes a dissimilarity without citing any scientific evidence for the existence of that dissimilarity

(E) rejects a proposal presumably advanced in good faith without acknowledging any such good faith .

A is best.

surgical procedures may have inherent risks which are not dependent of the skill of the surgeon

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2004, 22:54
The answer is A. I am sure Geethu will come with a great explaination.

I chose C. Here is my logic

The argument talks about the new surgical method. If surgeon's skill does not remain same then even the old surgeries will have different results. Since old surgical methods are still employed ( I assumed it )and successfull the dependency on the variation of surgeons skill is minimal. The argument assumes too much about the surgeon's skill.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: Aus

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2004, 08:40
As per my understanding.

The argument says clinical trials should not be extended to surgical procedures as they depend on the surgeons skills which can not be measured like the drug composition. But A says there could be other better treatments than surgery. In this case the surgeons are to be blamed irrespective of their skills.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2004, 08:52
Hi Geethu,

Authors holds surgeon's skill as an important factor in the effectivemess of the new surgical procedure. We have to prove that authors reasoning is flawed. We either show that surgeon's skill does not matter very much or the new surgical method are better than any existing treatment. I dont understand how A brings out the flaw in the authors reasoning.

Now I am begining to think that C and A are almost same.

Please explain further by disecting the argument and what is expected.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: Aus
Re: CR - New surgical procedures [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2004, 09:10
praetorian123 wrote:
anandnk wrote:
19. The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely used as systematic tests of pharmaceutical innovations, to new surgical procedures should not be implemented. The point is that surgical procedures differ in one important respect from medicinal drugs: a correctly prescribed drug depends for its effectiveness only on the drug's composition, whereas the effectiveness of even the most appropriate surgical procedure is transparently related to the skills of the surgeon who uses it.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) does not consider that new surgical procedures might be found to be intrinsically more harmful than the best treatment previously available

(B) ignores the possibility that the challenged proposal is deliberately crude in a way designed to elicit criticism to be used in relining the proposal

(C) assumes that a surgeon's skills remain unchanged throughout the surgeon's professional life

(D) describes a dissimilarity without citing any scientific evidence for the existence of that dissimilarity

(E) rejects a proposal presumably advanced in good faith without acknowledging any such good faith .

A is best.

surgical procedures may have inherent risks which are not dependent of the skill of the surgeon

praeto, why don't you explain it further.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2016, 04:31
A seems to be the best choice here

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely   [#permalink] 15 Apr 2016, 04:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by