It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 04:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The proposal to hire twelve new fraud investigators in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 26 May 2011
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 27 [1], given: 10

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GPA: 3.22
The proposal to hire twelve new fraud investigators in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2011, 18:10
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (00:53) correct 44% (00:59) wrong based on 169 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The proposal to hire twelve new fraud investigators in Greenvale is foolish. This is because there is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new investigators, but not to pay the salaries of additional prosecutors and administrative assistants to process the increased load of fraud cases that new investigators usually generate.

Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

Studies have shown that an increase in the number of a town's fraud investigators does not necessarily reduce fraud.
When one neighboring town increased the number of fraud investigators by 20 percent last year, it resulted in 30 percent more charges of fraud and 25 percent more convictions.
If funding for the new investigators' salaries is approved, support for other town services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
In most United States towns, not all fraud cases result in charges, and not all charges result in trials.
Greenvale's ratio of fraud investigators to local officials has reached a level at which an increase in the number of investigators will have a deterrent effect on fraud.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 27 [1], given: 10

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 672

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 37

Re: Knewton CR - Weaken [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2011, 21:07
E is the obvious winner here.

Argument says that it is not a good idea to hire 12 new fraud investigators because the new investigators will generate more fraud investigations and trials. E counters it by indicating that the number of fraud cases will actually decrease as a result of increase in number of investigators.

Crick

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 37

Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2010
Posts: 194

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 12

Re: Knewton CR - Weaken [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2011, 22:02
Agreed with Crick

E directly contradicts the author's opinion saying that investigators will definitely decrease fraud cases

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 12

Manager
Status: livin on a prayer!!
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Location: Australia
Re: Knewton CR - Weaken [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2011, 02:41
E is a direct contradiction, hence E
_________________

Aim for the sky! (800 in this case)
If you like my post, please give me Kudos

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Manager
Status: Essaying
Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 146

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 8

Location: Ghana
Concentration: Finance, Finance
Schools: Cambridge
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GPA: 3.9
WE: Accounting (Education)
Re: Knewton CR - Weaken [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2011, 04:33
It shows that by increasing the number of investigators, there will not be an increase in prosecution and admin work.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 8

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 889

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: Knewton CR - Weaken [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2011, 01:33
All agreed with E. I will explain the remains wrong.

(A) Studies have shown that an increase in the number of a town's fraud investigators does not necessarily reduce fraud. => clearly strengthen.
(B) When one neighboring town increased the number of fraud investigators by 20 percent last year, it resulted in 30 percent more charges of fraud and 25 percent more convictions. => Talking about neighboring town is quite irrelevant. However, the statistic in this town is the basement for the conclusion of the argument. Strengthen
(C) If funding for the new investigators' salaries is approved, support for other town services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.=> not relate to the effect of increasing number of investigator
(D) In most United States towns, not all fraud cases result in charges, and not all charges result in trials. => Like (C), this answer also irrelevant, huh?
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Oct 2015
Posts: 367

Kudos [?]: 156 [0], given: 211

Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.93
WE: Account Management (Education)
Re: The proposal to hire twelve new fraud investigators in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2016, 05:54
cvsmech wrote:
The proposal to hire twelve new fraud investigators in Greenvale is foolish. This is because there is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new investigators, but not to pay the salaries of additional prosecutors and administrative assistants to process the increased load of fraud cases that new investigators usually generate.

Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

Studies have shown that an increase in the number of a town's fraud investigators does not necessarily reduce fraud.
When one neighboring town increased the number of fraud investigators by 20 percent last year, it resulted in 30 percent more charges of fraud and 25 percent more convictions.
If funding for the new investigators' salaries is approved, support for other town services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
In most United States towns, not all fraud cases result in charges, and not all charges result in trials.
Greenvale's ratio of fraud investigators to local officials has reached a level at which an increase in the number of investigators will have a deterrent effect on fraud.

Tough one really. I just wonder how some persons find this question not difficult. It shows I'm way behind. Cos i got confused with C and D. And i chose C cos i thougt may be there will be enough money afteral for the funding. Cos a crucial assumption was that money wont be enough. If there is a way of getting enough money for the trials then wouldnt the argument be weakened?

Kudos [?]: 156 [0], given: 211

CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2604

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 182

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: The proposal to hire twelve new fraud investigators in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2016, 20:14
cvsmech wrote:
The proposal to hire twelve new fraud investigators in Greenvale is foolish. This is because there is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new investigators, but not to pay the salaries of additional prosecutors and administrative assistants to process the increased load of fraud cases that new investigators usually generate.

Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

Studies have shown that an increase in the number of a town's fraud investigators does not necessarily reduce fraud.
When one neighboring town increased the number of fraud investigators by 20 percent last year, it resulted in 30 percent more charges of fraud and 25 percent more convictions.
If funding for the new investigators' salaries is approved, support for other town services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
In most United States towns, not all fraud cases result in charges, and not all charges result in trials.
Greenvale's ratio of fraud investigators to local officials has reached a level at which an increase in the number of investigators will have a deterrent effect on fraud.

I got to E by POE.
my pre-thinked weakener - \$ from new findings of frauds > costs
A - irrelevant
B - charges and convictions are out of scope
C - out of scope
D - as in B, charges are out of scope
E - remains

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 182

Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2016
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The proposal to hire twelve new fraud investigators in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jun 2016, 01:21
Oh that's great news,Fraud investigation is important to hire for business, we also provide this service if you need then contact :

contact : 905-332-4807

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The proposal to hire twelve new fraud investigators in   [#permalink] 02 Jun 2016, 01:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by