AdityaHongunti wrote:
The proximity of wealth and of poverty in the downtown centers of many metropolises—there can be a luxury high rise on one block and a homeless encampment on the next—exemplifies the income inequality that has inspired grassroots political movements across the globe.
Essentially, the difference among the options has been pivoted on three issues:
1. S-V: The Proximity ... exemplifies is the correct option, therefore eliminate Option B & D.
Quote:
B. of poverty in the downtown centers of many metropolises—there can be a block with a luxury high rise and a homeless encampment on the next—exemplify
D. poverty in the downtown centers of many metropolises—there can be a luxury high rise on one block and a homeless encampment on the next—exemplify
2. Another point that should be noticed is the Appositive.
"there can be a luxury high rise on one block and a homeless encampment on the next" this is the correct option, so eliminate Option E.
Quote:
E. poverty in the downtown centers of many metropolises—there can be a block with a luxury high rise and a homeless encampment on the next—exemplifies
Quote:
A. of poverty in the downtown centers of many metropolises—there can be a luxury high rise on one block and a homeless encampment on the next—exemplifies
C. poverty in the downtown centers of many metropolises—there can be a luxury high rise on one block and a homeless encampment on the next—exemplifies
3. the last point is difference between "Proximity of X and Y" and "Proximity of X and of Y".
The proximity of X and of Y makes it sound as if the sentence is discussing two proximities. i.e one proximity of X and another proximity of Y. Whereas the sentence intends to mean that there is only one proximity: the proximity of X and Y.
Thus Option C is correct.
Thanks,