GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 21:43

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2015
Posts: 82
GMAT ToolKit User
The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2016, 14:24
1
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (01:50) correct 39% (01:47) wrong based on 278 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets has improved bicycle safety dramatically. Over the past 12 months, the number of serious bicycling injuries has been reduced by nearly 70 percent. Unfortunately, helmet usage has not reduced the number of all types of bike injuries. While serious head trauma has decreased by nearly 85 percent, broken bones now represent 20 percent of all reported bicycling injuries. This is a significant increase from last year’s 14 percent.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument does which of the following?


A. It fails to include information about any types of bicycle injuries other than head trauma and broken bones.

B. It implies that the same conclusion can result from two different sets of causes.

C. It fails to take into account any possible increase in the number of people riding bicycles over the past 12 months.

D. It presumes that an increase in the percentage of injuries involving broken bones precludes a decrease in the actual number of such injuries.

E. It ignores the fact that a 70 percent overall decrease in injuries would not allow for an 85 percent decrease in one specific type of injury.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 753
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2016, 22:25
D it is: It presumes that an increase in the percentage of injuries involving broken bones precludes a decrease in the actual number of such injuries.---->A TYPICAL confusion of PERCENTAGES and ACTUAL NUMBERS
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4033
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2016, 11:32
saiesta wrote:
The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets has improved bicycle safety dramatically. Over the past 12 months, the number of serious bicycling injuries has been reduced by nearly 70 percent. Unfortunately, helmet usage has not reduced the number of all types of bike injuries. While serious head trauma has decreased by nearly 85 percent, broken bones now represent 20 percent of all reported bicycling injuries. This is a significant increase from last year’s 14 percent.


The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument does which of the following?

A. It fails to include information about any types of bicycle injuries other than head trauma and broken bones. - Out of scope
B. It implies that the same conclusion can result from two different sets of causes . - Out of scope
C. It fails to take into account any possible increase in the number of people riding bicycles over the past 12 months. - Out of scope
D. It presumes that an increase in the percentage of injuries involving broken bones precludes a decrease in the actual number of such injuries.
The stimulus starts with -
Quote:
The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets has improved bicycle safety dramatically.
and
The concluding lines of the stimulus states -
Quote:
serious head trauma has decreased by nearly 85 percent, broken bones now represent 20 percent of all reported bicycling injuries. This is a significant increase from last year’s 14 percent.


There is an increase in % broken bone injuries from 14% to 20% this year, yet there is a dramatic improvement in bicycle safety.

E. It ignores the fact that a 70 percent overall decrease in injuries would not allow for an 85 percent decrease in one specific type of injury. - Out of scope
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 110
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V27
GPA: 1.9
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2016, 04:59
Abhishek009 wrote:
saiesta wrote:
The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets has improved bicycle safety dramatically. Over the past 12 months, the number of serious bicycling injuries has been reduced by nearly 70 percent. Unfortunately, helmet usage has not reduced the number of all types of bike injuries. While serious head trauma has decreased by nearly 85 percent, broken bones now represent 20 percent of all reported bicycling injuries. This is a significant increase from last year’s 14 percent.


The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument does which of the following?

A. It fails to include information about any types of bicycle injuries other than head trauma and broken bones. - Out of scope
B. It implies that the same conclusion can result from two different sets of causes . - Out of scope
C. It fails to take into account any possible increase in the number of people riding bicycles over the past 12 months. - Out of scope
D. It presumes that an increase in the percentage of injuries involving broken bones precludes a decrease in the actual number of such injuries.
The stimulus starts with -
Quote:
The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets has improved bicycle safety dramatically.
and
The concluding lines of the stimulus states -
Quote:
serious head trauma has decreased by nearly 85 percent, broken bones now represent 20 percent of all reported bicycling injuries. This is a significant increase from last year’s 14 percent.


There is an increase in % broken bone injuries from 14% to 20% this year, yet there is a dramatic improvement in bicycle safety.

E. It ignores the fact that a 70 percent overall decrease in injuries would not allow for an 85 percent decrease in one specific type of injury. - Out of scope


Not clear to me at all. please tell me why option C is incorrect?
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Status: GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 272
Location: India
Re: The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2016, 00:29
"C" has a statistical flaw. Neither does percentage translate to number nor does number translate to percentage.
_________________

Aryama Dutta Saikia
Jamboree Education Pvt. Ltd.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2018
Posts: 1
Re: The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2018, 03:50
Can you please explain why D is right and other options are wrong
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets &nbs [#permalink] 31 Aug 2018, 03:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The public service advertising campaign promoting the use of helmets

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.