It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 19:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 95 [1], given: 6

The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2009, 00:36
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:05) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 74 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow economic growth in the coming year. However, those predictions would not have affected the employment rate if it had not been for the lack of capital reserves of major industries. So if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the validity of the argument above?

A. Major industry foresaw the drop in employment.

B. Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.

C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.

D. The government could pass legislation mandating that major industries set aside a fixed amount as capital reserves every year.

E. The drop in the employment rate was more severe this year than last.

Kudos [?]: 95 [1], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 53 [1], given: 25

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2010, 20:30
1
KUDOS
C from me too.

Conclusion : the employment rate will not decline in the future.
Premise (among many) : major industries increase their capital reserves

So, there is a gap. Author is assuming that all that matters is the capital reserve. If we strike at that assumption that there may be other reasons as well affecting the Employement Rate, the conclusion will be weakened.

C does precisely that.

Now, B : Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
If *some* major industries had appreciable capital reserve how will it impact ? it does not impact on the assumption.

Kudos [?]: 53 [1], given: 25

Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 114

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 3

Location: Mumbai

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2009, 05:48
I am confused between B and C. I will prefer to choose C, since it mentions that that labor costs could also adversely impact employment rate.

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Schools: Columbia(RD-ding w/o int),

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2009, 11:23

C provides another reason why employment rates could be low in the future and thus weakens the argument.

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2009, 08:29
OA is C.

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 6

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 539

Kudos [?]: 602 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2010, 19:51
What is wrong with B?

Kudos [?]: 602 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 539

Kudos [?]: 602 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2010, 20:41
Got you, thanks!!!
vibhaj wrote:
C from me too.

Conclusion : the employment rate will not decline in the future.
Premise (among many) : major industries increase their capital reserves

So, there is a gap. Author is assuming that all that matters is the capital reserve. If we strike at that assumption that there may be other reasons as well affecting the Employement Rate, the conclusion will be weakened.

C does precisely that.

Now, B : Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
If *some* major industries had appreciable capital reserve how will it impact ? it does not impact on the assumption.

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 602 [0], given: 2

Re: Employment Rate   [#permalink] 03 Feb 2010, 20:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by