It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 23:28

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 11:14
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (02:12) correct 50% (03:52) wrong based on 7 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major publications that have been exposed as fabrications serves to bolster the contention that publishers are more interested in selling a copy than in printing the truth. Even minor publications have staffs to check such obvious fraud.

The above argument assumes that:

A) newspaper stories of dubious authenticity are a new phenomenon
B) minor publications do a better job of fact-checking than do major publications
C) everything a newspaper prints must be factually verifiable
D) only recently have newspapers admitted to publishing erroneous stories
E) publishers are ultimately responsible for what is printed in their newspapers

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 11:17
straight E.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 129

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: New York, NY

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 11:46
B -- the statement assumes that minor publications have few if any factual errors.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 12:05
I was between B and C.

I will go for C.
In B, the argument does not assume that minor publications do a better job of checking. It just simply saying that they also need to verify the data.
On the other hand, C provides a valid and obvious assumption. If this is not true the argument falls.

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1337

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Publishers and Fraud [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 12:16
I go with C cuz the argument focuses on the factually verification of news/information.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: MD/DC/VA
Re: CR - Publishers and Fraud [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 14:53
[quote="Matador"]The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major publications that have been exposed as fabrications serves to bolster the contention that publishers are more interested in selling a copy than in printing the truth. Even minor publications have staffs to check such obvious fraud.

The above argument assumes that:

A) newspaper stories of dubious authenticity are a new phenomenon
B) minor publications do a better job of fact-checking than do major publications
C) everything a newspaper prints must be factually verifiable
D) only recently have newspapers admitted to publishing erroneous stories
E) publishers are ultimately responsible for what is printed in their newspapers[/quote]

I am going with E. The passage says "...the contention that publishers are more interested in selling a copy than in printing the truth". This is basically what E says.. the author has to assume that publishers are the ones responsbile for what gets printed. OA?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 60

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Land Of Opportunities

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 15:00
My take - C, as it is an assumption that everything printed can be checked.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 15:44
I go with C because here we are concerned in verifying the truth. Throughout the passage author talks about verifying truth.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 15:55
E it is..

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 117

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 15:58
I pick C.

The statement says major publications have been exposed to bolster sales than the truth. The last sentence says that even minor publications should be fact checked. So the argument assumes that both major and minor arguments should be fact checked. So C best describes this

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 494

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

Location: Europe

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 20:13
Go for 'B'.

The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major publications that have been exposed as fabrications serves to bolster the contention that publishers are more interested in selling a copy than in printing the truth. Even minor publications have staffs to check such obvious fraud.

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 23:41
Can we please get the OA?

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 658

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 02:40
The passage blames the pablishers for the fabrications. He believes that publishers are ultimately responsible for this.
Hence E.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 03:36
I know the answer is E;

I am just trying to come in terms with the explanations. I think the idea of identifying the publishers as the cause of the problem is a good choice. If you then negate E, (of course its hard to negate statements) the argument then that the publishers are not concerned about the truth ceases to exit.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 04:49
Even I know the answer is E - Kaplan I think :p

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 16:44
OA is E.

OE:
The argument is based on a scope shift: The author concludes that publishers are more interested in selling copy than in printing the truth. The evidence is that many newspaper articles have recently been exposed as frauds. The assumption is contained in E: that publishers know about, or must take responsibility for, the truth of every article in their newspapers. If that is not the case, then the author cannot blame publishers for the increase of bogus stories.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

06 Apr 2006, 16:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.