Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 25 Mar 2017, 20:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 145
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 11:14
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (03:12) correct 50% (03:52) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major publications that have been exposed as fabrications serves to bolster the contention that publishers are more interested in selling a copy than in printing the truth. Even minor publications have staffs to check such obvious fraud.

The above argument assumes that:

A) newspaper stories of dubious authenticity are a new phenomenon
B) minor publications do a better job of fact-checking than do major publications
C) everything a newspaper prints must be factually verifiable
D) only recently have newspapers admitted to publishing erroneous stories
E) publishers are ultimately responsible for what is printed in their newspapers
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1130
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 11:17
straight E.
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 129
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 11:46
B -- the statement assumes that minor publications have few if any factual errors.
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 169
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 12:05
I was between B and C.

I will go for C.
In B, the argument does not assume that minor publications do a better job of checking. It just simply saying that they also need to verify the data.
On the other hand, C provides a valid and obvious assumption. If this is not true the argument falls.
VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1348
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Publishers and Fraud [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 12:16
I go with C cuz the argument focuses on the factually verification of news/information.
Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 2
Location: MD/DC/VA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Publishers and Fraud [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 14:53
[quote="Matador"]The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major publications that have been exposed as fabrications serves to bolster the contention that publishers are more interested in selling a copy than in printing the truth. Even minor publications have staffs to check such obvious fraud.

The above argument assumes that:

A) newspaper stories of dubious authenticity are a new phenomenon
B) minor publications do a better job of fact-checking than do major publications
C) everything a newspaper prints must be factually verifiable
D) only recently have newspapers admitted to publishing erroneous stories
E) publishers are ultimately responsible for what is printed in their newspapers[/quote]

I am going with E. The passage says "...the contention that publishers are more interested in selling a copy than in printing the truth". This is basically what E says.. the author has to assume that publishers are the ones responsbile for what gets printed. OA?
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 60
Location: Land Of Opportunities
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 15:00
My take - C, as it is an assumption that everything printed can be checked.
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 252
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 15:44
I go with C because here we are concerned in verifying the truth. Throughout the passage author talks about verifying truth.
Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 15:55
E it is..
Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 117
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 15:58
I pick C.

The statement says major publications have been exposed to bolster sales than the truth. The last sentence says that even minor publications should be fact checked. So the argument assumes that both major and minor arguments should be fact checked. So C best describes this
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 497
Location: Europe
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 20:13
Go for 'B'.

The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major publications that have been exposed as fabrications serves to bolster the contention that publishers are more interested in selling a copy than in printing the truth. Even minor publications have staffs to check such obvious fraud.
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 169
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2006, 23:41
Can we please get the OA?
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 02:40
The passage blames the pablishers for the fabrications. He believes that publishers are ultimately responsible for this.
Hence E.
Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 102
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 03:36
I know the answer is E;

I am just trying to come in terms with the explanations. I think the idea of identifying the publishers as the cause of the problem is a good choice. If you then negate E, (of course its hard to negate statements) the argument then that the publishers are not concerned about the truth ceases to exit.
VP
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1403
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 04:49
Even I know the answer is E - Kaplan I think :p
Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 145
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 16:44
OA is E.

OE:
The argument is based on a scope shift: The author concludes that publishers are more interested in selling copy than in printing the truth. The evidence is that many newspaper articles have recently been exposed as frauds. The assumption is contained in E: that publishers know about, or must take responsibility for, the truth of every article in their newspapers. If that is not the case, then the author cannot blame publishers for the increase of bogus stories.
06 Apr 2006, 16:44
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 QOTD #4 A newspaper article in the Smithville Herald argued that the s 6 31 May 2016, 08:38
13 A newspaper recently reported the story of a group of 23 27 Mar 2012, 10:56
The increase in the number of newspaper articles exposed as 17 19 Jul 2011, 19:17
7 A recent series of newspaper articles revealed that 3 16 Dec 2010, 11:23
The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major 4 23 Jun 2007, 17:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by