Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 26 May 2017, 14:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 56
Schools: IESE
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2008, 01:09
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement among Canada, Mexico, and the United States is misnamed, because it would not result in truly free trade. Adam Smith, the economist who first articulated the principles of free trade, held that any obstacle placed in the way of the free movement of goods, investment, or labor would defeat free trade. So since under the agreement workers would be restricted by national boundaries from seeking the best conditions they could find, the resulting obstruction of the flow of trade would, from a free-trade perspective, be harmful.

The argument proceeds by

(A) ruling out alternatives
(B) using a term in two different senses
(C) citing a nonrepresentative instance
(D) appealing to a relevant authority
(E) responding to a different issue from the one posed

I'm a bit confused in the question. Can someone clarify what does this question mean?
Economist GMAT Tutor Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount CodesMagoosh Discount Codes
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1902
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 1122 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2008, 01:16
Snayt wrote:
The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement among Canada, Mexico, and the United States is misnamed, because it would not result in truly free trade. Adam Smith, the economist who first articulated the principles of free trade, held that any obstacle placed in the way of the free movement of goods, investment, or labor would defeat free trade. So since under the agreement workers would be restricted by national boundaries from seeking the best conditions they could find, the resulting obstruction of the flow of trade would, from a free-trade perspective, be harmful.

The argument proceeds by

(A) ruling out alternatives
(B) using a term in two different senses
(C) citing a nonrepresentative instance
(D) appealing to a relevant authority
(E) responding to a different issue from the one posed

I'm a bit confused in the question. Can someone clarify what does this question mean?


D for me!
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 155
Schools: Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2008, 03:06
Snayt wrote:
The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement among Canada, Mexico, and the United States is misnamed, because it would not result in truly free trade. Adam Smith, the economist who first articulated the principles of free trade, held that any obstacle placed in the way of the free movement of goods, investment, or labor would defeat free trade. So since under the agreement workers would be restricted by national boundaries from seeking the best conditions they could find, the resulting obstruction of the flow of trade would, from a free-trade perspective, be harmful.

The argument proceeds by

(A) ruling out alternatives
(B) using a term in two different senses
(C) citing a nonrepresentative instance
(D) appealing to a relevant authority
(E) responding to a different issue from the one posed

I'm a bit confused in the question. Can someone clarify what does this question mean?


I think the issue posed here is that NAFTA is misnamed, not that it is harmful to free trade.
Hence, E ????
Quite unsure of this one.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1561
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 2

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2008, 04:32
i would have picked B
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2008
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2008, 12:14
I think its C .. as economist is giving contradictory example...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 320
Location: Washington DC
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 4

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2008, 12:26
I think this question is asking the what is the structure of the argument. My pick is C. As auther starts with sarcasm with Nafta is misnamed and the provide a defination what nafta should be. And example of nonrepresentative use of NAFTA. Anyways whats the OA?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 792
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 25

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2008, 13:12
D.
Appealing to a relevant authority, and Adam Smith is it!
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 56
Schools: IESE
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2008, 13:18
OA is D
Re: CR   [#permalink] 28 May 2008, 13:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of rohitgoel15 8 27 Jul 2010, 13:15
The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement ggmatt 10 04 Sep 2009, 02:07
Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of tenaman10 2 07 Jun 2009, 08:20
3 The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement reply2spg 5 23 Feb 2009, 12:54
Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of neelabhmahesh 6 22 Feb 2008, 10:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.