It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 19:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement

Author Message
Current Student
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Schools: IESE

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 01:09
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement among Canada, Mexico, and the United States is misnamed, because it would not result in truly free trade. Adam Smith, the economist who first articulated the principles of free trade, held that any obstacle placed in the way of the free movement of goods, investment, or labor would defeat free trade. So since under the agreement workers would be restricted by national boundaries from seeking the best conditions they could find, the resulting obstruction of the flow of trade would, from a free-trade perspective, be harmful.

The argument proceeds by

(A) ruling out alternatives
(B) using a term in two different senses
(C) citing a nonrepresentative instance
(D) appealing to a relevant authority
(E) responding to a different issue from the one posed

I'm a bit confused in the question. Can someone clarify what does this question mean?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes e-GMAT Discount Codes Jamboree Discount Codes
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1447 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 01:16
Snayt wrote:
The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement among Canada, Mexico, and the United States is misnamed, because it would not result in truly free trade. Adam Smith, the economist who first articulated the principles of free trade, held that any obstacle placed in the way of the free movement of goods, investment, or labor would defeat free trade. So since under the agreement workers would be restricted by national boundaries from seeking the best conditions they could find, the resulting obstruction of the flow of trade would, from a free-trade perspective, be harmful.

The argument proceeds by

(A) ruling out alternatives
(B) using a term in two different senses
(C) citing a nonrepresentative instance
(D) appealing to a relevant authority
(E) responding to a different issue from the one posed

I'm a bit confused in the question. Can someone clarify what does this question mean?

D for me!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1447 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Schools: Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 03:06
Snayt wrote:
The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement among Canada, Mexico, and the United States is misnamed, because it would not result in truly free trade. Adam Smith, the economist who first articulated the principles of free trade, held that any obstacle placed in the way of the free movement of goods, investment, or labor would defeat free trade. So since under the agreement workers would be restricted by national boundaries from seeking the best conditions they could find, the resulting obstruction of the flow of trade would, from a free-trade perspective, be harmful.

The argument proceeds by

(A) ruling out alternatives
(B) using a term in two different senses
(C) citing a nonrepresentative instance
(D) appealing to a relevant authority
(E) responding to a different issue from the one posed

I'm a bit confused in the question. Can someone clarify what does this question mean?

I think the issue posed here is that NAFTA is misnamed, not that it is harmful to free trade.
Hence, E ????
Quite unsure of this one.

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 04:32
i would have picked B

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 22 Apr 2008
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 12:14
I think its C .. as economist is giving contradictory example...

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 4

Location: Washington DC

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 12:26
I think this question is asking the what is the structure of the argument. My pick is C. As auther starts with sarcasm with Nafta is misnamed and the provide a defination what nafta should be. And example of nonrepresentative use of NAFTA. Anyways whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 4

Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 786

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 25

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 13:12
D.
Appealing to a relevant authority, and Adam Smith is it!

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 25

Current Student
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Schools: IESE

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 13:18
OA is D

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: CR   [#permalink] 28 May 2008, 13:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The recently negotiated North American Free Trade Agreement

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.