Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 14:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 929
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 0

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2005, 17:54
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

80% (02:12) correct 20% (01:24) wrong based on 57 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an environmentally preferable alternative to the prevailing practices of incineration and of dumping in landfills. Recycling is profitable, as the recycling programs already in operation demonstrate. A state legislator proposes that communities should therefore be required to adopt recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the advisability of implementing the proposal?

A) Existing recycling programs have been voluntary, with citizens participation ranging from 30% in some communities to 80% in others.

B) Existing recycling programs have been restricted to that 20% of solid waste that, when reprocessed, can match processed raw materials in quality and price.

C) Existing recycling programs have had recurrent difficulties finding purchasers for their materials usually because of quantities too small to permit cost effective pickup and transportation.

D) Some of the materials that can be recycled are the very materials that, when incinerated, produce the least pollution

E) Many of the materials that cannot be recycled are also difficult to incinerate.
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1113
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2005, 18:23
B.

B finds loophole in the evidence :
Recycling is profitable, as the recycling programs already in operation demonstrate.

on basis of which legislator making decision.
VP
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1115
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2005, 19:01
B too
_________________

Antoine

Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth
Tuck Alumni, Class of 2008

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 929
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2005, 20:33
can u guys further explain this one, im not sure i understand. thanks!
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 14
Location: Toronto
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2005, 20:33
B)
Intern
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2005, 23:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
[quote="joemama142000"]The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an environmentally preferable alternative to the prevailing practices of incineration and of dumping in landfills. Recycling is profitable, as the recycling programs already in operation demonstrate. A state legislator proposes that communities should therefore be required to adopt recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the advisability of implementing the proposal?

A) Existing recycling programs have been voluntary, with citizens participation ranging from 30% in some communities to 80% in others.

B) Existing recycling programs have been restricted to that 20% of solid waste that, when reprocessed, can match processed raw materials in quality and price.

C) Existing recycling programs have had recurrent difficulties finding purchasers for their materials usually because of quantities too small to permit cost effective pickup and transportation.

D) Some of the materials that can be recycled are the very materials that, when incinerated, produce the least pollution

E) Many of the materials that cannot be recycled are also difficult to incinerate.[/quote]
------
A-wrong-irrelevant. The fact that previous programs were voluntary doesn't expose a flaw in the proposal
B-Seems OK. The politician has 2 proposals. Adopt a program. Ensure 50% recycling. Both these are based on existing programs. If we can show that the nature of the existing programs is such that it calls into question the proposals, our job is done. A restriction of 20% has been put in for some reason and calls into question the 50% proposal. Also there is no evidence showing that these restrictions can be overcome in the next five years.
C-Wrong-This actually refutes the evidence that existing programs have proven profitable.
D-Wrong- Some? What about the others?
E-Irrelevant. We are not concerned with those that cannot be recycled/incinerated.
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 929
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2005, 23:41
Conclusion: Make recycling mandatory and to reach target of 50%

Evidence: cuz it is environmentally preferable and is profitable.

I chose C because it directly attacks the Evidence that recycling is not profitable. Wouldnt that weaken the conclusion by attacking the evidence?

I did not choose b cuz it was just weird at first glance.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 402
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 00:34
a) Out of scope
b) Out of scope
c) Attacks the evidence saying that recycling is profitable
d) Pollution has nothing to do with the argument
e) Out of scope
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 402
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 00:37
joemamma, do you have the OA?

I picked C as well, but I only because that was the best option. However, I did not like the option. Here is why: since the mayor is proposing to increase recycling to 50%, it would be a fair assumption that the problems faced in C will not exist anymore.

However, the other options weren't any better.
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 929
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 00:48
Good point. i hear ya rigger. But the answer is B.
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 500
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 01:55
I vote for B too.
Good one.
SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1713
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 370 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2005, 13:34
I will try my luck with C.
I can not cancel out C.

What is the OA.
_________________

hey ya......

Intern
Joined: 11 Mar 2016
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2016, 13:10
A: discussed about the recent recycling which is already positively effecting , Do we know what will happen in next 5 years . Can't say recycling is profitable or not.
B: discussed about 20% of solid waste which gives no benefit while compared with processed material.. Moreover we know nothing about the rest of 30% that upto 50% will it be profitable or not
C: quantity being so small that it does not allow cost effective method , rather can cost more every time...so that way recycling might be costly than other methods----- weakens
D: incineration is better for some materials ..what about others ..can't say anything
E: can't judge which one is better or profitable

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2016
Posts: 87
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 66

Re: The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2016, 03:43
123456Ritika wrote:
A: discussed about the recent recycling which is already positively effecting , Do we know what will happen in next 5 years . Can't say recycling is profitable or not.
B: discussed about 20% of solid waste which gives no benefit while compared with processed material.. Moreover we know nothing about the rest of 30% that upto 50% will it be profitable or not
C: quantity being so small that it does not allow cost effective method , rather can cost more every time...so that way recycling might be costly than other methods----- weakens
D: incineration is better for some materials ..what about others ..can't say anything
E: can't judge which one is better or profitable

Posted from my mobile device

IMO C is wrong.

If existing recycling program have led to difficulties because the quantities are small, recycling 50% is likely to increase the quantity.
So the argument would be strengthened
_________________

Cheers,
Shri
-------------------------------
GMAT is not an Exam... it is a war .. Let's Conquer !!!

Re: The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an   [#permalink] 22 Sep 2016, 03:43
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 The roof of Northtown's municipal equipment-storage 6 03 May 2017, 14:17
6 The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building 5 27 Jan 2017, 22:26
25 There are those who complain that municipal libraries are 16 20 Nov 2015, 13:05
3 In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect s 17 18 Jul 2014, 05:27
The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started 16 10 Sep 2013, 04:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by