Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 15:34 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 15:34

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618585 [42]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618585 [12]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2019
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [2]
Given Kudos: 19
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Posts: 220
Own Kudos [?]: 151 [3]
Given Kudos: 160
Location: United Kingdom
GPA: 3.9
WE:Account Management (Other)
Send PM
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Hi,
IMO B.

Rejitha A semi-colon can join two ICs. What follows a semi-colon often is a conjunctive adverb such as therefore, however etc. I believe "the reason is that" is not a conjunctive adverb.

The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear; some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.

Using option B solves the issue. Both ICs could stand on their own and still related.

Originally posted by Doer01 on 10 Feb 2020, 08:14.
Last edited by Doer01 on 12 Feb 2020, 04:17, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 20 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Both B and E have the correct structure, but E seems too wordy, so pick B.

Not sure if it is fine to use semicolon to show the cause_effect relationship between the two clauses.

Posted from my mobile device
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Posts: 829
Own Kudos [?]: 888 [2]
Given Kudos: 354
Location: Poland
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 3: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
2
Kudos
I would go with B as well on the basis of concision. I don't see any structural issues in E either. But B is more concise than E.

Answer - B
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Posts: 8018
Own Kudos [?]: 4095 [0]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1:
545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, this is because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.

(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show
(B) is still unclear; some studies show
(C) are still unclear because some studies show
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show
(E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show


singular subject the relationship ; option c is out
option A , D use , : which is incorrect usage
option B & E ; E is wordy B is correct ; usage is right ;
IMO B
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2018
Posts: 264
Own Kudos [?]: 346 [1]
Given Kudos: 271
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37 (Online)
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, this is because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.

(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show
(B) is still unclear; some studies show
(C) are still unclear because some studies show
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show
(E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show


Clearly the answer seems to be between B and E.

Both B and E have two independent clauses, the only difference is in the second clause of 'the reason is that'

Now, in my opinion, in B we know that second clause is related to the first clause but there is no word for relating them both.

Now in E we have this particular word 'that'. This word seems to be refering to the whole previous close, therefore relating them both.

Hence IMO answer should E.

But not sure if my reasoning is correct. Waiting for OA and OE
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, this is because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.

(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show
(B) is still unclear; some studies show
(C) are still unclear because some studies show
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show
(E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show



I see B and E are the only valid ones, but I have this problem with B. A semi colon joins 2 independent but related clauses, is it not necessary to have "This is because/The reason is that" to exactly show what this relationship is? Are we not taking out some info from the original question? It is not really apparent from B that the reason for the first clause is the second clause.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 45
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, this is because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.

(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show
(B) is still unclear; some studies show
(C) are still unclear because some studies show
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show
(E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



The original sentence incorrectly uses a comma to join two independent clauses. As is the case with the two clauses in this sentence (“The relationship…is still unclear” and “this is because some studies show…while others do not”), independent clauses contain a subject and a verb and can stand alone as independent sentences. While semicolons can join two independent clauses, commas cannot. Further, “this is because” is unnecessarily wordy.

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) CORRECT. The semicolon correctly connects two independent clauses. Also, the singular verb “is” agrees in number with the singular subject “relationship.”

(C) The plural verb “are” does not agree in number with the singular subject “relationship.”

(D) While “is” agrees in number with the singular subject “relationship,” the colon is used incorrectly in this choice. Colons must be preceded by independent clauses. Independent clauses contain a subject and a verb and can stand alone as independent sentences. In this case, however, the colon is preceded by “The relationship…is still unclear because,” which is not a clause that can stand alone as an independent sentence.

(E) While the semicolon correctly connects two independent clauses, and while “is” agrees in number with the singular subject “relationship,” “the reason is that” is unnecessarily wordy. The more concise version in answer choice (B) is preferred.


Bunuel correct me if i m wrong but when i say "THIS IS BECAUSE..." the 2nd part of the sentence becomes a dependent clause right!
the reason to remove A acc to me is that saying "this is because .." is wordy and there are better alternatives.
and can u also shed some light on the use of "this" in this case ,what it specifically refers to
Current Student
Joined: 21 Jan 2020
Status:Aim for the moon. If you miss, you may hit a star.
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 40 [2]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.63
WE:Project Management (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Prateeksansanwal wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, this is because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.

(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show
(B) is still unclear; some studies show
(C) are still unclear because some studies show
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show
(E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



The original sentence incorrectly uses a comma to join two independent clauses. As is the case with the two clauses in this sentence (“The relationship…is still unclear” and “this is because some studies show…while others do not”), independent clauses contain a subject and a verb and can stand alone as independent sentences. While semicolons can join two independent clauses, commas cannot. Further, “this is because” is unnecessarily wordy.

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) CORRECT. The semicolon correctly connects two independent clauses. Also, the singular verb “is” agrees in number with the singular subject “relationship.”

(C) The plural verb “are” does not agree in number with the singular subject “relationship.”

(D) While “is” agrees in number with the singular subject “relationship,” the colon is used incorrectly in this choice. Colons must be preceded by independent clauses. Independent clauses contain a subject and a verb and can stand alone as independent sentences. In this case, however, the colon is preceded by “The relationship…is still unclear because,” which is not a clause that can stand alone as an independent sentence.

(E) While the semicolon correctly connects two independent clauses, and while “is” agrees in number with the singular subject “relationship,” “the reason is that” is unnecessarily wordy. The more concise version in answer choice (B) is preferred.


Bunuel correct me if i m wrong but when i say "THIS IS BECAUSE..." the 2nd part of the sentence becomes a dependent clause right!
the reason to remove A acc to me is that saying "this is because .." is wordy and there are better alternatives.
and can u also shed some light on the use of "this" in this case ,what it specifically refers to


I'll give a shot: first, "this is because..." here is an independent clause so we are missing conjunction "and". Secondly "this" doesn't really refer to anything legitimately, although we all know "this" should refer to "The relationship... is still unclear". "This/that/those/these" normally don't stand alone and can't refer to the entire clause (with exceptions but very rarely tested)
Current Student
Joined: 31 Aug 2017
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 40 [0]
Given Kudos: 430
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39 (Online)
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, this is because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.

(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show
(B) is still unclear; some studies show
(C) are still unclear because some studies show
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show
(E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show


Hello Experts,

It seems in Option B, there is no reference of 2nd IC to the 1st. After the semi-colon, how is the clause,"some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.", connected. Should we "between them" in the 2nd IC ?

Thanks,
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2019
Posts: 111
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [0]
Given Kudos: 516
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
I guess I should be more careful in choosing the options.
I picked E instead of B
:(
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [0]
Given Kudos: 259
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
Can someone shed light on the cause effect relationship used here? Is it correct to connect two ICs with semicolon, when the meaning of the sentence demands cause effect relationship? Why OA is Option B?

Regards
Vighnesh
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
Expert Reply
VIGHNESHKAMATH wrote:
Can someone shed light on the cause effect relationship used here? Is it correct to connect two ICs with semicolon, when the meaning of the sentence demands cause effect relationship? Why OA is Option B?

Regards
Vighnesh


Hello VIGHNESHKAMATH,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, a semicolon can be used to join two clauses that convey a cause-effect relationship, if the relationship is logically implicit.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jan 2019
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
ExpertsGlobal5 wrote:
VIGHNESHKAMATH wrote:
Can someone shed light on the cause effect relationship used here? Is it correct to connect two ICs with semicolon, when the meaning of the sentence demands cause effect relationship? Why OA is Option B?

Regards
Vighnesh


Hello VIGHNESHKAMATH,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, a semicolon can be used to join two clauses that convey a cause-effect relationship, if the relationship is logically implicit.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team


For B, why wouldnt you use a colon instead of a semi colon? I felt a colon would be more appropriate.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2015
Posts: 343
Own Kudos [?]: 230 [0]
Given Kudos: 175
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GPA: 3.5
WE:Advertising (Advertising and PR)
Send PM
Re: The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, this is because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.

(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show
(B) is still unclear; some studies show
(C) are still unclear because some studies show
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show
(E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show


Is/Are relates to relationship and not cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors, so eliminate C as the verb should be singular.
(C) are still unclear because some studies show

Semi colon has two independent sentences so eliminate E
E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show

Colon is lists but after because is odd so eliminate D
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show

Again in D " ,this is" is redundant
(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show

We're left with B- correct answer
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
Send PM
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
nivivacious wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors is still unclear, this is because some studies show a causal relationship while others do not.

(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show
(B) is still unclear; some studies show
(C) are still unclear because some studies show
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show
(E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show


Is/Are relates to relationship and not cell phone use and the incidence of brain tumors, so eliminate C as the verb should be singular.
(C) are still unclear because some studies show

Semi colon has two independent sentences so eliminate E
E) is still unclear; the reason is that some studies show

Colon is lists but after because is odd so eliminate D
(D) is still unclear because: some studies show

Again in D " ,this is" is redundant
(A) is still unclear, this is because some studies show

We're left with B- correct answer

you may have got the right answers but your reason for eliminating E is incorrect. semicolon can be used to connect two IC. Both the sentences in the option E are independent.
Konse book se padhte ho?
GMAT Club Bot
The relationship between cell phone use and the incidence of brain tum [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne