GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Aug 2018, 12:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 96

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2011, 14:34
I went with D
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 16

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2011, 18:09
Ans:E
The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other industry in the United States. Nearly 80 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment. At the same time, approximately 70 percent of restaurants in the United States are small businesses that are usually too cash poor to invest in energy-efficient technology.

Which of the following statements draws the most reliable conclusion from the information above

(A) The availability of energy-efficient equipment will reduce the energy costs of the restaurant industry by approximately 30 percent.
The question doesnt give any information on how much energy efficient equipment will reduce the energy costs by.

(B) No industry in the United States spends greater than \$10 billion each year on energy.

(C) By using energy-efficient technology, a small restaurant will reduce its expenses by a greater percentage than will a large restaurant.
The question does not compare expenses of a small and large restaurants.

(D) Approximately \$2 billion of the amount spent on energy each year by the restaurant industry is not squandered.
Question says \$8billion is squandered on energy costs. It does not specify if the remaining \$2billion is a justified expense or is squandered on something else.

(E) The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry.
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 223

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2011, 18:20
E is the only one which must be true in all conditions.

D is incorrect, because what if 10 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of neon lights (just an example)? then the non-squandered amount reduces to \$1b.
Manager
Status: Retaking next month
Affiliations: None
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 166
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
GPA: 3.01
WE: Sales (Manufacturing)

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2011, 01:12
(D) Approximately \$2 billion of the amount spent on energy each year by the restaurant industry is not squandered.----\$ 2 B may be Squandered by something else.
(E) The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry. ---This seems to be a better conclusion. Less ambiguous than D
Intern
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 25

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2011, 00:04
E is the most relevant and hits the bulls eye
_________________

_________________________
Try and you will succeed !

Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 216

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2011, 03:21
D and E were very confusing. But the necessity in D for the remaining amount not to be squandered away is extreme. It is not necessary to be so. E is decipherable from the premises and hence is the proper conclusion.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it

Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 54
Schools: NUS

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2011, 20:08
good catch....went for D,but convinced for E now
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 67
Schools: Smith '16 (I)

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2011, 09:45
though E and D are close, but i think in the end it ill be E..as you cannot tell what constitutes rest of 20% so +1 for E
_________________

Life is very similar to a boxing ring.
Defeat is not final when you fall down…
It is final when you refuse to get up and fight back!

1 Kudos = 1 thanks
Nikhil

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2011, 02:52
E

If you do POE
Then (A,B,C) goes off D also but had it said 2 billion on ‘electricity wastage’ then it would be right,
E is perfect as it state the obvious choice to save electricity wastage , concluding the statement.
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Posts: 74

### Show Tags

12 May 2012, 00:16
The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other industry in the United States. Nearly 80 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment. At the same time, approximately 70 percent of restaurants in the United States are small businesses that are usually too cash poor to invest in energy-efficient technology.

Which of the following statements draws the most reliable conclusion from the information above?

A- The availability of energy-efficient equipment will reduce the energy costs of the restaurant industry by approximately 30 percent.

B- No industry in the United States spends greater than \$10 billion each year on energy.

C- By using energy-efficient technology, a small restaurant will reduce its expenses by a greater percentage than will a large restaurant.

D- Approximately \$2 billion of the amount spent on energy each year by the restaurant industry is not squandered.

E- The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry.
_________________

MGMAT CAT MATH http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmat-cat-math-144609.html
MGMAT SC SUMMARY: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmat-sc-summary-144610.html

VP
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 1459
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: Q800 V740

### Show Tags

17 May 2012, 22:06
E it is - if 80% of the energy spend of the restaurant industry is being squandered by inefficient equipment, it is clear that the replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential resource of energy savings for the restaurant industry
_________________

GyanOne | Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions Blog

Premium MBA Essay Review|Best MBA Interview Preparation|Exclusive GMAT coaching

Get a FREE Detailed MBA Profile Evaluation | Call us now +91 98998 31738

Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2012
Posts: 4
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: ISB '14 (I)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 2.6
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2012, 10:30
"E" can be wrong.
It says that "The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry."

The arguement says that Nearly 80 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment. Suppose this 80 % can be reduced to zero also by doing modifications in the inefficient equipments. In that case both Replacement and Modification represents the equally large potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry. Replacement will not be the largest source then.
Manager
Status: exam is close ... dont know if i ll hit that number
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 167
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-09-2012
GPA: 3.2

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2012, 21:14
though i picked e

other options look like giving a good competition to the answer choice

can anyone explain individual answer choice with explanation
_________________

just one more month for exam...

Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 103

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2012, 05:20
A- The availability of energy-efficient equipment will reduce the energy costs of the restaurant industry by approximately 30 percent. We cannot conclude that we will save 30% it can be more than 30% also

B- No industry in the United States spends greater than \$10 billion each year on energy. --. the arguments talking abt restaurant industy and not abt all industry so this cannot be the conclusion.

C- By using energy-efficient technology, a small restaurant will reduce its expenses by a greater percentage than will a large restaurant. --> the argument is discussing energy wastage and not abt expenses.. So incorrect...

D- Approximately \$2 billion of the amount spent on energy each year by the restaurant industry is not squandered. --> the argument states 80% is wasted by use of inefficient equipment and 20% can we wasted in other ways... so we cannot conclude that \$2 billion is used efficiently...

E- The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry. --> from the argument we know 8 billion money spent is squandered by inefficient use of equipments. So by replcaing the equipments we can save enery.. therfore correct.
Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1
Location: Uzbekistan
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2012, 09:18
I think the answer is C. The answer E uses extreme language. D is not mentioned in the question stem.
VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1252
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2012, 03:11
its a good point raised by Jiten. But one should remember that he/she has to draw the most reliable conclusion of the above. All others apart from E are incorrect.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2012
Posts: 35

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2012, 16:59
I like E for the conclusion question. But, what would be the answer if it had been an inference question? I still don't get how inference is different from conclusion. My understanding is that a conclusion would summarize what is being said in the stimulus and E does the job for a conclusion question. But, regarding inference, does one need to analyse the arguement? Help will be appreciated.
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 637
Location: India

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2012, 19:28
sharmila79 wrote:
I like E for the conclusion question. But, what would be the answer if it had been an inference question? I still don't get how inference is different from conclusion. My understanding is that a conclusion would summarize what is being said in the stimulus and E does the job for a conclusion question. But, regarding inference, does one need to analyse the arguement? Help will be appreciated.

Dear Sharmila79,

Inference is anything that would logically follow given the argument and it is something that is not explicitly stated in the argument. A conclusion, on the other hand is something that logically follows from the premises. A conclusion is the whole point which the author of the argument wants to make.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna Holistic Solutions
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Holistic and Systematic Approach

Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 637
Location: India

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2012, 20:11
pmenon wrote:
The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other industry in the United States. Nearly 80 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment. At the same time, approximately 70 percent of restaurants in the United States are small businesses that are usually too cash poor to invest in energy-efficient technology.

Which of the following statements draws the most reliable conclusion from the information above

(A) The availability of energy-efficient equipment will reduce the energy costs of the restaurant industry by approximately 30 percent.
(B) No industry in the United States spends greater than \$10 billion each year on energy.
(C) By using energy-efficient technology, a small restaurant will reduce its expenses by a greater percentage than will a large restaurant.
(D) Approximately \$2 billion of the amount spent on energy each year by the restaurant industry is not squandered.
(E) The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry.

Premise of the argument: "Nearly 80 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment"

Conclusion of the argument is something which is drawn from the premises. Only Choice E can be concluded from the premise because any squandering of money that is more than 50% definitely represents the largest potential source of savings.

Choice D is wrong because , 80% of money that is squandered is based only on one factor i.e., use of inefficient equipment. There may be other factors which may also be squandering of money.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna Holistic Solutions
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Holistic and Systematic Approach

Manager
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 161
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2012, 20:57
For (E) I doubt the phrase "largest potential source" . To me , "largest" is extreme .We have no idea whether there can be some other potential source, say a new innovation , which can do a better energy savings .

The source of this question is doubtful .
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

Re: The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other &nbs [#permalink] 17 Dec 2012, 20:57

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 58 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.