It is currently 19 Jan 2018, 21:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 216 [0], given: 67

Location: Poland

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2013, 11:32
VeritasPrepRon wrote:
For E, since we know the restaurant industry spends \$10B on energy every year, if we could save 5,000,000,001\$ we know this would be the greatest amount it could possibly save, i.e. 50%+1. If a sector is over 50%, it must necessarily represent the largest possible savings. Thus E must be true.

What if the industry spends \$100B on lawn mowers each year? Of which 90% is squandered due to lack of lawns?

What is the difference between the logic in above contest and in this reasoning:
VeritasPrepRon wrote:
For D, could you imagine a scenario in which 80% of the \$10B is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment and say 5% is squandered on something else, say paying environmental fees or licensing for your equipment? Sure, why not? This money could still be squandered even if it wasn't spent on inefficient equipment. Tempting, but this answer choice doesn't HAVE to be true.

I could manipulate:
Quote:
For E, could you imagine a scenario in which 80% of the \$100B is squandered by the use of inefficient lawn mowers and say 90% could be saved? Sure, why not? This money could also be saved and would amount much greater than potential energy savings. Tempting, but this answer choice doesn't HAVE to be true.

What am I missing?
_________________

If I answered your question with this post, use the motivating power of kudos!

Kudos [?]: 216 [0], given: 67

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 11 Dec 2012
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 301 [1], given: 66

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2013, 11:44
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi HumptyDumpty, the entire sentence is important, and answer choice E says "The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry."

They could save \$100B on lawns, but that doesn't have anything to do with a source of energy savings. Since the question has given us 80% of the amount of energy spent on the budget, this must necessarily be where the majority of the savings can come from.

Beware logic like "D is more restrictive than E", inference questions must be true, 100% of the time. If you find one scenario that doesn't work for D and 2 that don't work for E, that doesn't mean D is better. If you can find faults in two different choices, you may need to try looking at them the right way because there's a missing piece of information or an extra assumption that is erroneous.

Hope this helps!
-Ron
_________________

Kudos [?]: 301 [1], given: 66

Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2013, 10:54
sanjay_gmat wrote:
pmenon wrote:
The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other industry in the United States. Nearly 80 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment. At the same time, approximately 70 percent of restaurants in the United States are small businesses that are usually too cash poor to invest in energy-efficient technology.

Which of the following statements draws the most reliable conclusion from the information above

A. The availability of energy-efficient equipment will reduce the energy costs of the restaurant industry by approximately 30 percent.

B. No industry in the United States spends greater than \$10 billion each year on energy.

C. By using energy-efficient technology, a small restaurant will reduce its expenses by a greater percentage than will a large restaurant.

D. Approximately \$2 billion of the amount spent on energy each year by the restaurant industry is not squandered.

E. The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry.

I think D is more reliable than E.

The question said that 80% (or 8 bn) is squandered "by inefficient equipment". This doesn't mean that the other 20% (or\$ 2 bn) is NOT squandered. it could have been squandered by something else, other than inefficient equipment.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2013
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 11-15-2013
GPA: 3.8
WE: Other (Accounting)

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2013, 21:03
pmenon wrote:
The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other industry in the United States. Nearly 80 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment. At the same time, approximately 70 percent of restaurants in the United States are small businesses that are usually too cash poor to invest in energy-efficient technology.

Which of the following statements draws the most reliable conclusion from the information above

(A) The availability of energy-efficient equipment will reduce the energy costs of the restaurant industry by approximately 30 percent.
(B) No industry in the United States spends greater than \$10 billion each year on energy.
(C) By using energy-efficient technology, a small restaurant will reduce its expenses by a greater percentage than will a large restaurant.
(D) Approximately \$2 billion of the amount spent on energy each year by the restaurant industry is not squandered.
(E) The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry.

As with any CR question, listing down the premises:

i) The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other industry in the US.
ii) Majority of amount spent on energy is squandered due to inefficient equipment use.
iii) As such, Majority of restaurants being poor can't invest in energy efficient technology.

Options and POE:

(A) - No premises support this conclusion - eliminated.
(B) - The premises state that the restaurant wastes[ more energy - eliminated.
(C) - The premises do not support this conclusion - eliminated.
(D) - Too obvious a conclusion; but does not take in to account other premise - eliminated.
(E) - Yes. All 3 premises can lead to this conclusion reasonably. - IMO E.
Pretty straightforward question, IMO. Any thoughts - do reply; would love to discuss!

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 34

Location: India
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2013, 07:46
dkverma wrote:
I went for D.

E,

Why D, the entire 10 billion is squandered, its just that 80 percent of it stems from inefficient usage of energy. So most of the saving can be achieved by investing in energy efficient appliances for the restaurant industry.

Hence E.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 34

Intern
Joined: 24 Feb 2014
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 21

Schools: ISB

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2014, 17:08
Its E for sure...
The option D is just the reiteration of what has been already mentioned in the argument.

For ex.: Stating "80% of 10 is wasted" is also the same as stating "20% is not wasted".
So option D cannot be a conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 21

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10266

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2015, 10:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1891

Kudos [?]: 1129 [0], given: 93

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2016, 20:29
pmenon wrote:
The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other industry in the United States. Nearly 80 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment. At the same time, approximately 70 percent of restaurants in the United States are small businesses that are usually too cash poor to invest in energy-efficient technology.

Type - Inference
Boil it down - restaurant business wastes most energy
-80 % of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment
-70% of the restaurants are small businesses that are too poor to invest in energy efficient tech

(A) The availability of energy-efficient equipment will reduce the energy costs of the restaurant industry by approximately 30 percent. - Incorrect - no such information is provided
(B) No industry in the United States spends greater than \$10 billion each year on energy. - Out of scope - we are only told that restaurant business wastes most energy . There might be other industries that spend more than 10\$ billion per year and are energy efficient.
(C) By using energy-efficient technology, a small restaurant will reduce its expenses by a greater percentage than will a large restaurant. - Out of scope
(D) Approximately \$2 billion of the amount spent on energy each year by the restaurant industry is not squandered. Incorrect - the remaining 2 billion \$ might be squandered by other means
(E) The replacement of inefficient equipment represents the largest potential source of energy savings for the restaurant industry. Correct

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 1129 [0], given: 93

Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 596

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 140

Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2017, 20:33
80 percent of the \$10 billion spent on energy by the restaurant industry each year is squandered by the use of inefficient equipment

Hence E

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 140

SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1860

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 2406

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2017, 17:15
This is still an inference question.
D is not correct because out of the other 2 billion, some money will still be squandered by something other than the equipment.

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 2406

VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1106

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 607

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2017, 09:25
Imo E
It is only inference that is 100 % true hence it is the only possible solution.
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 607

Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2015
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 234

Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Internet and New Media)

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2017, 23:45
Is not E an extreme answer choice? I didn't select E as potential answer choice ( I selected D ) bcz it used 'Largest'. So what is the explanation for that ?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 234

Re: The restaurant business wastes more energy than any other   [#permalink] 19 Dec 2017, 23:45

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   [ 72 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by