It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 09:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The school principal

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7736

Kudos [?]: 17779 [0], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: The school principal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2010, 14:06
noboru wrote:
OA is D, and your reasoning is fantastic!

However,

Premise: C>E
Conclusion: No E>No C

is not a flawed pattern.

Could anybody clarify that?
Thanks in advance!

You are right. It is not flawed reasoning.

But this reasoning isn't representative of the actual situation.
If the situation were the following:
Bad teaching causes bad grades.
No bad grades means not bad teaching.

Then the reasoning would be correct.

But here, the argument says "The school principal insisted that bad teaching causes student failures. Then he went on to conclude that no failures means no bad teaching."

'Bad teaching causes student failures' is not a premise. So we do not have to assume it to be true. It is just the principal's perspective. The principal's reasoning is flawed because of multiple reasons.
1 - There could be many other reasons for failures too e.g. students do not work hard.
2 - It is possible that the teaching is still bad but the students are putting in more effort on their own or perhaps taking classes with some prep provider or taking some online classes. There can be ten other reasons why failures disappeared.

In essence, we are saying that the cause-effect relation the principal insists on doesn't necessarily hold. That is why his reasoning is flawed.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17779 [0], given: 235

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1483

Kudos [?]: 1499 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: The school principal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2010, 14:38
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
noboru wrote:
OA is D, and your reasoning is fantastic!

However,

Premise: C>E
Conclusion: No E>No C

is not a flawed pattern.

Could anybody clarify that?
Thanks in advance!

You are right. It is not flawed reasoning.

But this reasoning isn't representative of the actual situation.
If the situation were the following:
Bad teaching causes bad grades.
No bad grades means not bad teaching.

Then the reasoning would be correct.

But here, the argument says "The school principal insisted that bad teaching causes student failures. Then he went on to conclude that no failures means no bad teaching."

'Bad teaching causes student failures' is not a premise. So we do not have to assume it to be true. It is just the principal's perspective. The principal's reasoning is flawed because of multiple reasons.
1 - There could be many other reasons for failures too e.g. students do not work hard.
2 - It is possible that the teaching is still bad but the students are putting in more effort on their own or perhaps taking classes with some prep provider or taking some online classes. There can be ten other reasons why failures disappeared.

In essence, we are saying that the cause-effect relation the principal insists on doesn't necessarily hold. That is why his reasoning is flawed.

that helped a lot.
thanks!
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1499 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 212

Kudos [?]: 856 [0], given: 974

Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Re: The school principal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2011, 00:51
We reveal that the construction of the stem is Assumption-Result-Conclusion. The similar pattern we see in ans. choice D.

C also does come close but with one distinction that here the manager does directly interfere in order to cause the result which is not a case in the stem. Thus, it is D.

Kudos [?]: 856 [0], given: 974

TOEFL Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1602

Kudos [?]: 600 [0], given: 40

Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Re: The school principal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2011, 21:35
The answer is D.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 600 [0], given: 40

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1283

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

Re: The school principal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2011, 02:37
its a clean D here.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 7

Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.5
WE: Securities Sales and Trading (Investment Banking)
Re: The school principal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2011, 20:33
yea itz D

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 7

Re: The school principal   [#permalink] 18 Jun 2011, 20:33

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The school principal

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.