GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Jan 2019, 20:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

January 20, 2019

January 20, 2019

07:00 AM PST

07:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2011
Posts: 7
The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2012, 12:09
2
12
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

55% (01:17) correct 45% (01:35) wrong based on 619 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare degenerative disease had begun to die six months earlier, even though they had shown no signs of the disease then.
(A) earlier, even though they had shown no signs of the disease then
(B) earlier, but they were not showing no signs of the disease then
(C) earlier, no outward signs of the disease had been shown in them, however
(D) earlier without any signs of the disease shown then
(E) earlier, even though no signs of it were seen in them at that time

Source: Aristotle New SC Question Bank
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 141
Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
Re: The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2014, 13:46
5
aagar2003 wrote:
Who can explain how to make sure that 'they' in the second sentence after comma refers to rats and not the scientists themselves.

Also official explanation for answer choice E mentions usage of pronouns 'it' and 'they' introduces ambiguity. Really?
I thought 'it' clearly refers to the disease without any ambiguity and them in this case should be rats (by commonsense). Can somebody please clarify in details?

Second Option : earlier, but they were not showing no signs of the disease then

This option is fatally wrong because of double negation. 'They were not showing ANY signs of disease' is to be used instead of ''They were not showing NO signs of disease'

Now coming back to your point. 'They' refers back to rats because its the rats who are being noted for the disease and not the scientists. Please make sure that you never check pronoun errors in vacuum. Grammatically a pronoun can refer back to multiple nouns but if contextually it refers back to one noun then it can simply be overlooked.

You might want to fit the noun in place of pronoun to check if it makes sense.

The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare degenerative disease had begun to die six months earlier, even though SCIENTISTS had shown no signs of the disease then.

how can the dying of rats be connected to scientists showing signs of disease? can it?

I'll explain you with another example mentioned in one of the GMATclub threads:

King George is the ruler of the largest empire, its size as large as a continent.

What are the possible antecedents for the pronoun “its” in the above sentence?

“empire, continent”.

Now consider the following sentences and see which of them make sense in the context of the given sentence.
a. King George is the ruler of the largest empire, the empire’s size as large as a continent. (Makes perfect sense.)
b. King George is the ruler of the largest empire, the continent’s size as large as a continent. (This sentence doesn’t sound logical. Why does a continent come into the picture all of a sudden?)

As you can see only “empire” is the logical antecedent of the pronoun “its” in the above sentence.

Therefore the pronoun “its” unambiguously refers to “empire”

Which is why they use the word 'logical' in the very definition.
Attachments

Screen Shot 2014-03-11 at 5.43.00 PM.png [ 38.46 KiB | Viewed 4153 times ]

##### General Discussion
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 301

### Show Tags

Updated on: 04 Jul 2012, 11:39
2
In the first example below, the ‘they’ is clearly ambiguous because it can refer to either the control group mice or those who receive Xylanol.

In the second sentence, the ‘they’ is apparently ambiguous. However were we to say that the ‘they’ could refer to mice, we are saying that it is possible that mice could dress up in laboratory gear. This is clearly absurd because outside of Disney mice do not wear clothes. Thus a pronoun is not ambiguous if can reasonably only refer to one thing/group.

Clearly Ambiguous

Compared to mice in a control group, those mice receiving Xylanol were more likely to develop tumors, even if they had tumors before the study.

Not Ambiguous but Absurd

Scientists who test potentially carcinogenic substances on mice may be at a slight risk for cancer, even if they wear special protective clothing.

Original Sentence

The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare degenerative disease had begun to die six months earlier, even though they had shown no signs of the disease then.

As for the original sentence, the potential ambiguity is not absurd the way it is in the second example above. After all, scientists could potentially show signs of a degenerative disease (vs. mice donning lab gear). Nonetheless, it is clear from the sentence that the scientists are studying the rats for a disease. Therefore, when the second half of the sentence mention ‘they’ in reference to the disease, it is clear who the ‘they’ is.

Now let’s contrast the original sentence to the first one above. The ‘they’ could refer to either of the two groups, i.e. either the control group of the Xylanol group could have consisted of mice that had tumors before the study began. However, in the original sentence the scientists were the ones studying a degenerative disease they were not the ones suffering from it.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Originally posted by ChrisLele on 05 Jan 2012, 17:02.
Last edited by ChrisLele on 04 Jul 2012, 11:39, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2011
Posts: 7

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2012, 23:30
Thanks ChrisLele for the accurate explanation.
Actually my choice was D, but now I can notice that it is a bit changing the meaning of the original sentence by ignoring the subject of the passive voice (earlier without any signs of the disease shown then).

D- "earlier without showing any signs of the disease then",

It would be a better answer choice than answer A because it not only eliminates the pronoun THEY, but also clearly tells that the rats are the ones showing the signs of the disease.

Do you agree with me?
Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Posts: 203
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2012, 00:25
Thanks for the detailed explanation ChrisLele.
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 151

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2012, 01:06
for me A and E stands out, and A is the best
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 93

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2012, 10:45
ChrisLele, thank you for the detailed explanation. I was down with A and E but chose E as I thought they may refer to any of the two, but now I see what is the logical referent. However, what is wrong with E, it refers to disease and them will refer to by logic again to rats? Please explain in case I am missing on something.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 301

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2012, 11:45
1
@pavanpuneet:

Answer choice (E) uses the passive construction, '...were seen in them...', and is therefore less concise than the original answer.

Hope that helps
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 93

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2012, 11:47
Should I in that case interpret that it is because of the passive construction that the answer choice is rejected and not because the pronoun use? or in other words if GMAT allowed two options as correct answers E would be the second option? Please confirm.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 301

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2012, 11:00
2
Exactly: the answer choice is incorrect because the passive construction is used, not because of the pronoun.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1060
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare degen  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2013, 23:36
2
2
The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare degenerative disease had begun to die six months earlier, even though they had shown no signs of the disease then.

(A) earlier, even though they had shown no signs of the disease then
(B) earlier, but they were not showing no signs of the disease then
(C) earlier, no outward signs of the disease had been shown in them, however
(D) earlier without any signs of the disease shown then
(E) earlier, even though no signs of it were seen in them at that time
(A) earlier, even though they had shown no signs of the disease then
(B) earlier, but they were not showing no signs of the disease then
(C) earlier, no outward signs of the disease had been shown in them, however
(D) earlier without any signs of the disease shown then
(E) earlier, even though no signs of it were seen in them at that time

IMO A.
B changes the meaning "not showing no signs"=> there were signs. "however"is misplaced in C.
In D "had begun to die without" is not clear, without modifies die. I would avoid passive in E.

_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 61
Schools: Smith '16 (I)
Re: Latest Grail question bank SC 700 level  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2013, 23:52
I will go with E, as we already have a HAD in non underlined portion to reflect 2 time periods.
_________________

Life is very similar to a boxing ring.
Defeat is not final when you fall down…
It is final when you refuse to get up and fight back!

1 Kudos = 1 thanks
Nikhil

Manager
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 112
Re: Latest Grail question bank SC 700 level  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2013, 00:46
I would chose E.
Basic Question: Why few options has then at the end of A, B and D? Does is holds any meaning or rule in grammar?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 680
Re: Latest Grail question bank SC 700 level  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2013, 01:04
it has to be E : earlier, even though no signs of it were seen in them at that time
Intern
Joined: 16 Mar 2013
Posts: 19
Location: United States
Schools: NTU '15 (S)
GPA: 3.08
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Re: Latest Grail question bank SC 700 level  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2013, 04:02
it has to be E : earlier, even though no signs of it were seen in them at that time

definitely A .What does "it " refer to in E..It could be either disease or rats..
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 680
Re: The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare degen  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2013, 05:00
Quote:
definitely A .What does "it " refer to in E..It could be either disease or rats..

my dear "it" is singular pronoun ."rats" is plural so "it" is referring to degenerative disease

make sense ?
Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2012
Posts: 34
Re: The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare degen  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2013, 06:59
isn't 'they' ambiguous? can't it refer to rats or scientists?
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4616
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare degen  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2013, 07:43
I wouldn’t entertain any doubts about the pronoun in the close - running choices A and E. After all, the disease is all about the rats and not about the scientists. In E also, there is no doubt about ‘it and them ‘(not they as somebody has pointed out; there is no ‘they’ in that choice at all) And such touch and go reference is the basis of the modern day pronoun - based questions. If one cannot logically see through the reference, it is going to be difficult
But the only difference I see between A and E is that both arms of the sentences are in active voice in A, while they are in active- passive mode in E. But I wouldn’t know whether GMAT will test a question on such trivial grounds alone
_________________

you can know a lot about something but not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2009
Posts: 21
Re: The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2014, 18:49
Who can explain how to make sure that 'they' in the second sentence after comma refers to rats and not the scientists themselves.

Also official explanation for answer choice E mentions usage of pronouns 'it' and 'they' introduces ambiguity. Really?
I thought 'it' clearly refers to the disease without any ambiguity and them in this case should be rats (by commonsense). Can somebody please clarify in details?
SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1705
Concentration: Finance

### Show Tags

24 May 2014, 16:50
ChrisLele wrote:
In the first example below, the ‘they’ is clearly ambiguous because it can refer to either the control group mice or those who receive Xylanol.

In the second sentence, the ‘they’ is apparently ambiguous. However were we to say that the ‘they’ could refer to mice, we are saying that it is possible that mice could dress up in laboratory gear. This is clearly absurd because outside of Disney mice do not wear clothes. Thus a pronoun is not ambiguous if can reasonably only refer to one thing/group.

Clearly Ambiguous

Compared to mice in a control group, those mice receiving Xylanol were more likely to develop tumors, even if they had tumors before the study.

Not Ambiguous but Absurd

Scientists who test potentially carcinogenic substances on mice may be at a slight risk for cancer, even if they wear special protective clothing.

Original Sentence

The scientists noted that rats suffering from the rare degenerative disease had begun to die six months earlier, even though they had shown no signs of the disease then.

As for the original sentence, the potential ambiguity is not absurd the way it is in the second example above. After all, scientists could potentially show signs of a degenerative disease (vs. mice donning lab gear). Nonetheless, it is clear from the sentence that the scientists are studying the rats for a disease. Therefore, when the second half of the sentence mention ‘they’ in reference to the disease, it is clear who the ‘they’ is.

Now let’s contrast the original sentence to the first one above. The ‘they’ could refer to either of the two groups, i.e. either the control group of the Xylanol group could have consisted of mice that had tumors before the study began. However, in the original sentence the scientists were the ones studying a degenerative disease they were not the ones suffering from it.

Xylanol?? Where is that mentioned in the original question?
Re: Isn't THEY ambigous!!!! &nbs [#permalink] 24 May 2014, 16:50

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by