Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 May 2017, 20:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The senator has long held to the general principle that no

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 101
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

The senator has long held to the general principle that no [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2008, 08:37
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The senator has long held to the general principle that no true work of art is obscene, and thus that there is no conflict between the need to encourage free artistic expression and the need to protect the sensibilities of the public from obscenity. When well-known works generally viewed as obscene are cited as possible counterexamples, the senator justifies accepting the principle by saying that if these works really are obscene then they cannot be works of art.
The senator’s reasoning contains which one of the following errors?
(A) It seeks to persuade by emotional rather than intellectual means.
(B) It contains an implicit contradiction.
(C) It relies on an assertion of the senator’s authority.
(D) It assumes what it seeks to establish.
(E) It attempts to justify a position by appeal to an irrelevant consideration.
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 690
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 469 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2008, 13:00
The senator has long held to the general principle that no true work of art is obscene, and thus that there is no conflict between the need to encourage free artistic expression and the need to protect the sensibilities of the public from obscenity. When well-known works generally viewed as obscene are cited as possible counterexamples, the senator justifies accepting the principle by saying that if these works really are obscene then they cannot be works of art.

is the OA B?
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 690
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 469 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2008, 13:08
D sounds more logical.
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1562
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2008, 16:19
D fits best. Senator is using circular reasoning here.
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 790
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2008, 16:45
Argument diagram:
Senator: art of work is not indecent
No need to protect public sensibilities from art work since art work is not indecent.

(A) It seeks to persuade by emotional rather than intellectual means. [No statements that makes argument persuasive – eliminate it]
(B) It contains an implicit contradiction. [No implicit contradiction – eliminate it]
(C) It relies on an assertion of the senator’s authority. [Not mentioned anywhere Senator’s authority – eliminate it]
(D) It assumes what it seeks to establish. [Hold it – long held to general principle ]
(E) It attempts to justify a position by appeal to an irrelevant consideration.[Nothing that is irrelevant mentioned – eliminate it]

Director
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 775
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2008, 19:21
Should be 'D'.

The senator has to establish that the true artwork can't be obscene. Now in order to estalish it, the senator assumes that if it is obscene work, then it can never be a true work.
Hence the senator assumes what he needs to establish.
Intern
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 13
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2008, 19:38
I will go with D..what is the OA
_________________

fighter

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 293
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2008, 00:48
Another D.
Re: CR (senator)   [#permalink] 19 Feb 2008, 00:48
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 It has long been noted that there is a much higher incidence 8 02 Nov 2010, 02:25
Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long 0 27 Oct 2008, 07:30
CR Senator Frank 3 02 Sep 2008, 13:57
1 Smoking in bed has long been the main cause of home fires. 7 13 May 2011, 07:13
1 Smoking in bed has long been the main cause of home fires. 19 29 Jun 2008, 12:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by