It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 03:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 161

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 0

The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 09:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native American people who lived in what is now northern California, was conical in shape, its framework of poles overlaid with slabs of bark, either cedar or pine, and banked with dirt to a height of three to four feet.

A. banked with dirt to a height of
B. banked with dirt as high as that of
C. banked them with dirt to a height of
D. was banked with dirt as high as
E. was banked with dirt as high as that of

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Posts: 301

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 09:49
The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native American people who lived in what is now northern California, was conical in shape, its framework of poles overlaid with slabs of bark, either cedar or pine, and banked with dirt to a height of three to four feet.

A. banked with dirt to a height of
B. banked with dirt as high as that of
C. banked them with dirt to a height of
D. was banked with dirt as high as
E. was banked with dirt as high as that of

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 23:09
A for me. it modifies poles, so there should not be any "was".

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 23:21
tennis_ball wrote:
A for me. it modifies poles, so there should not be any "was".

I was sure it was D till I scrolled below and read your post and now I am all confused!

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 743

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2006, 23:42
tennis_ball wrote:
A for me. it modifies poles, so there should not be any "was".

"It" is either an expletive or a relative pronoun and never modifies anything. Reading too much of Kaplan's explanation can really screw your grammar funda

Very few "official explanations" actually use grammatical references to explain the correct usage. GMAT800 book has the worst possible explanations of official answers.
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Last edited by Swagatalakshmi on 01 Nov 2006, 00:21, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Re: SC - 11/10 : Single-family House [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 00:02
KC wrote:
The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native American people who lived in what is now northern California, was conical in shape, its framework of poles overlaid with slabs of bark, either cedar or pine, and banked with dirt to a height of three to four feet.

A. banked with dirt to a height of
B. banked with dirt as high as that of
C. banked them with dirt to a height of
D. was banked with dirt as high as
E. was banked with dirt as high as that of

It as used above is not an expletive.

"Its" properly modifies the single-family house.

overlaid with slabs and banked with dirt are parallel and correct. A is alright.

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Re: SC - 11/10 : Single-family House [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 02:25
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
dwivedys wrote:
KC wrote:
The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native American people who lived in what is now northern California, was conical in shape, its framework of poles overlaid with slabs of bark, either cedar or pine, and banked with dirt to a height of three to four feet.

A. banked with dirt to a height of
B. banked with dirt as high as that of
C. banked them with dirt to a height of
D. was banked with dirt as high as
E. was banked with dirt as high as that of

It as used above is not an expletive.
I didn't say it is used as an expletive.

"Its" properly modifies the single-family house.

Heard of the term "possessive case" of a relative pronoun ? There (btw an expletive !) are seven possessive pronouns in modern English: mine, yours, his, hers, its, ours, theirs.
"Its" is not a modifier of anything.

overlaid with slabs and banked with dirt are parallel and correct. A is alright.

Yes, case is one of the properties that pronouns have. Definitely sounds familiar.

You probably misunderstood what I wanted to say (or may be I did too).

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 05:24
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
tennis_ball wrote:
A for me. it modifies poles, so there should not be any "was".

"It" is either an expletive or a relative pronoun and never modifies anything. Reading too much of Kaplan's explanation can really screw your grammar funda

Very few "official explanations" actually use grammatical references to explain the correct usage. GMAT800 book has the worst possible explanations of official answers.

lol. sorry. my 'it' in my last post means the underlined part.

i am sorry you hate Kaplan, but I love it.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Sep 2004
Posts: 367

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - 11/10 : Single-family House [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 19:59
KC wrote:
The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native American people who lived in what is now northern California, was conical in shape, its framework of poles overlaid with slabs of bark, either cedar or pine, and banked with dirt to a height of three to four feet.

A. banked with dirt to a height of
B. banked with dirt as high as that of
C. banked them with dirt to a height of
D. was banked with dirt as high as
E. was banked with dirt as high as that of

D is wrong because it's misleading "Dirt as high as "
A stands firm.

Saurabh Malpani

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 20:41
g.matter wrote:
All right. Still trying understand... Why not D

"was" is wrong. it should be parallel to "overlaid", so 'was' can't be there.

and "as high as" is wrong too.

3 or 4 feet is already a height. u don't say 3 or 4 feet is high, because it is just a number, and it itself is already a height!

Do you say \$4 is expensive? you don't. you say this piece of clothing is expensive. that stock is cheap. but u don't say \$4 is cheap or \$5 is expensive. A number is not expensive or cheap. Same applies here: a number is not high or low.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

01 Nov 2006, 20:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.