It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 01:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The Smiths avoid the Browns because they dislike their

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Affiliations: IIBA
Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Location: India
Schools: HBS, Stanford, Stern, Insead, ISB, Wharton, Columbia
WE 1: Information Technology (Banking and Financial Services)
The Smiths avoid the Browns because they dislike their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2013, 18:20
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The Smiths avoid the Browns because they dislike their children.

Question asks to identify pronoun and their antecedents and correct the sentence if their is any ambiguity.
Solution says:The original sentence is ambiguous. The antecedent of they could be the Smiths or the Browns.Likewise, the antecedent of their could be the Smiths or the Browns.

My question is - on the basis of this rule that 'A pronoun in subject position in one clause may often be presumed to refer to the subject of a parallel clause' wouldn't they clearly refers to Smiths ?
_________________

~soaringAlone
~Live fast, die young and leave a marketable corpse behind !!

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 405

Kudos [?]: 932 [0], given: 184

Concentration: Strategy, Finance

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2013, 20:59
In my opinion, though Smiths are the subject of the first part of the sentence, both 'they' and 'their' have more than one possible antecedents. Even from meaning perspective, both Smiths and Browns can possibly take the place for 'they' and 'their'. This sentence needs to be reworded. Its unlikely that GMAT will leave such ambiguity in the correct answer choice.
_________________

Thanks,
Prashant Ponde

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
VOTE GMAT Practice Tests: Vote Here
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here

Kudos [?]: 932 [0], given: 184

Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1109

Kudos [?]: 1180 [4], given: 29

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2013, 13:19
4
KUDOS
Expert's post
It's a leap from "may often be presumed" to "clearly." Think about the following examples:

My parents don't like dogs because they bark.

Here, "they" clearly does not refer to the subject of the first clause--it's the dogs that bark.

My parents support charities because they are good people.

Here, "they" clearly refers to the original subject--the charities are not "good people."

My parents had lunch with my grandparents before they left town.

Here, it's really hard to tell the author's intent. From the sentences above, we see that such a pronoun could go either way. A good writer avoids this kind of ambiguity, so the GMAT won't have it in a correct sentence. The other two sentences could easily be correct answer choices, because there's no real ambiguity.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1180 [4], given: 29

Re: Ambiguous Pronoun   [#permalink] 02 Jan 2013, 13:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by