Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 30 May 2017, 05:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing

Author Message
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 698
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2005, 19:10
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (02:14) wrong based on 10 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing the benefit package of state and local workers during their employment, but it does not allow improvement of the package. Thus, the governer's veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

The author of the argument is assuming which of the following?

A) The governer wants to reduce the benefit package
B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit packge
C) The legistature supports the new pension program
D) The governer will probably veto the new pension program
E) The State Constituion permits the governer to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment.
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 198
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2005, 21:31
D seems right.
Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 718
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2005, 21:32
Confusing between B and C

Looks C to me...
SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1711
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2005, 21:59
D should be ok. veto itself is nothing unless it is used. so D is assumed.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 198
Location: Ghana
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2005, 02:00
IMO D does not clearly state whether the veto will approve the enhancement or not.

Because of the statement "the governor's veto power remains as the only possible obstacle...." i will pick A.
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 115
Location: Basel
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2005, 03:03
one more D
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 558
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2005, 03:54
A) The governer wants to reduce the benefit package
This is out. WE do not care about the intentions of the gov.

B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit packge
out-of-scope. we do not care if it is or if it is not

C) The legistature supports the new pension program

D) The governer will probably veto the new pension program
An outcome we are not interested in. Out

E) The State Constituion permits the governer to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment.

The gov. can reducee the benefit package, but we do not know if he is allowed to increase it. insufficient info. to support the conclsn.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 214
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2005, 05:22
I will go with C
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 483
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2005, 06:12
IMO it is E.

D can be rejected because it is similar in sense to A.
B is rejected because from the statement the package clearly includes the new pension program
C is out of scope, since legislature has no say, they cannot add or remove anything to the package
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 344
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2005, 07:45
another vote for C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 279
Location: CA, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2005, 08:15
between A and D

A is too strong - even though it is only a possiblity

D is rephrasing the governor's possible veto

C is not correct because the paragraph only describes the law, does not
indicate clearly the intention of the Legislature.
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 25
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2005, 14:05
Is there a typo in the question? ("not" in the second line)
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 698
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2005, 15:09
No there isnt a typo. I verified the question again. The OA is C.
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 279
Location: CA, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2005, 20:29
Looked at the question again, agree it should be C

Earlier I chose D because

[q]The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing the benefit package of state and local workers during their employment, but it does not allow improvement of the package. [/q]

I did not realize there were two programs, the old which the legislature cannot do much about (reduce or enhance), and the new one.
The author indicated the only obstacle being possible governor veto - implying the Legislature is for the new plan.
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2005, 11:02
I will go with C.

GA
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 137
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2005, 10:10
people who have chosen C, can they support it with reasoning?

So isn't C a part of the benefit package?
_________________

Thanks!

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5045
Location: Singapore
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2005, 23:36
Premise:
1) The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing the benefit package of state and local workers during their employment

2) It does not allow improvement of the package

Conclusion:

3) governer's veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

I'll go with E. The author assumes that the state constitution permits the governer to have the power to reduce the benefit package, and so stated that the governor is the only obstacle to the new program.
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 137
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2005, 07:06
gmataquaguy wrote:
The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing the benefit package of state and local workers during their employment, but it does not allow improvement of the package. Thus, the governer's veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

The author of the argument is assuming which of the following?

A) The governer wants to reduce the benefit package
B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit packge
C) The legistature supports the new pension program
D) The governer will probably veto the new pension program
E) The State Constituion permits the governer to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment.

The question stems states that both......reducing and enhancing is not allowed.....That doesn't sound right at all.

gmataquaguy, could you verify that please?
_________________

Thanks!

Re: CR: State Constitution   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2005, 07:06
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The state legislature has proposed a law that requires all new cars so 0 12 Feb 2017, 09:40
The state legislature has proposed a law that would require 8 26 Dec 2011, 02:10
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state 15 26 Aug 2010, 08:22
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the 8 06 Jun 2008, 06:55
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state 3 01 Sep 2007, 01:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by