It is currently 22 Sep 2017, 21:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The suicide wave that followed the United States stock

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 414

Kudos [?]: 455 [0], given: 14

The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 10:18
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

82% (01:01) correct 18% (00:32) wrong based on 122 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher.

Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage?

(A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and societal factors during any given historical period.
(B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920s and 1930s.
(C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years.
(D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year.
(E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other months.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by broall on 16 May 2017, 22:17, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 455 [0], given: 14

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1795

Kudos [?]: 1034 [1], given: 5

Location: New York
Re: The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 12:57
1
KUDOS
gurpreet07 wrote:
The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher.

Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage?
(A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and societal factors during any given historical period.
(B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920s and 1930s.
(C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years.
(D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year.
(E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other months.

Conclusion: The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact.

This is good one.. Little tricky one.

Definitely Answer between C and E. Other choices are stengthening the argument.

Choice E:
Premise : Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides
in October and in November was comparatively low .In only three other months were the monthly figures lower.

From the above premise Author assume that "All seasons/months will have same sucide rate - If there is no other factors." .

Choice E is Attacking this hole, But ask questions to yourself?? Is this affecting final Conclusion. (May be or May not) we are not sure.. This is not addressing Oct 1929 is lengend or fact.

Choice C :
Suice Rate in Oct and Nov of 1929 considerable high. So this is fact. This clearly undermines the Conclusion.

So C is the best answer.
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1034 [1], given: 5

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 414

Kudos [?]: 455 [1], given: 14

Re: The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 13:17
1
KUDOS
x2suresh wrote:
gurpreet07 wrote:
The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher.

Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage?
(A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and societal factors during any given historical period.
(B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920s and 1930s.
(C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years.
(D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year.
(E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other months.

Conclusion: The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact.

This is good one.. Little tricky one.

Definitely Answer between C and E. Other choices are stengthening the argument.

Choice E:
Premise : Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides
in October and in November was comparatively low .In only three other months were the monthly figures lower.

From the above premise Author assume that "All seasons/months will have same sucide rate - If there is no other factors." .

Choice E is Attacking this hole, But ask questions to yourself?? Is this affecting final Conclusion. (May be or May not) we are not sure.. This is not addressing Oct 1929 is lengend or fact.

Choice C :
Suice Rate in Oct and Nov of 1929 considerable high. So this is fact. This clearly undermines the Conclusion.

So C is the best answer.

I actually marked D

Kudos [?]: 455 [1], given: 14

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1795

Kudos [?]: 1034 [0], given: 5

Location: New York
Re: The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 13:41
gurpreet07 wrote:

I actually marked D

According to D:
Typical case
Jan -> Dec (Suicide rate increasing )
So Rate of Oct or Nov > 9 months (Jan-Sep)
Premise says in 1929: October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower.
That means.. Oct, Nov rates are even lower than usual... Thant means.. Sucide rates are decreased.. So, conclusion is Legend and not a fact.
This strengthens the argument.
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1034 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 222

Kudos [?]: 311 [0], given: 1

Re: The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2009, 05:16
gurpreet07 wrote:
I actually marked D

IMO the argument talks of "“suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929” Choice D talks of “years surrounding the stock market crash” and not on what has happened in 1929. Hence has no bearing on the argument

Kudos [?]: 311 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 216

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 6

Re: The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2009, 10:15
I'm gonna go with C.

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 6

Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2009, 13:01
C

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2009
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2009, 17:20
Agree with C

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2009
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 3

Re: The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2009, 19:06
IMO c....
The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years...this means it was not a legend but a fact that suicide rate was higher

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 414

Kudos [?]: 455 [0], given: 14

Re: The suicide wave that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2009, 20:26
I have already supplied the OA.......
but still its C

Kudos [?]: 455 [0], given: 14

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4207

Kudos [?]: 16277 [1], given: 1953

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
*700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2015, 10:34
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher.

Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage?

(A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and societal factors during any given historical period.

(B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920s and 1930s.

(C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years.

(D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year.

(E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other
months.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 16277 [1], given: 1953

Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2014
Posts: 75

Kudos [?]: 44 [1], given: 89

Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
Re: *700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2015, 12:04
1
KUDOS
souvik101990 wrote:
The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher.

Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage?

(A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and societal factors during any given historical period.

(B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920s and 1930s.

(C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years.

(D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year.

(E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other
months.

C indicates the hike in suicide rate in Oct Nov.

Kudos [?]: 44 [1], given: 89

Manager
Joined: 18 Mar 2014
Posts: 237

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 175

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.19
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: *700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2015, 21:20
souvik101990 wrote:
The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher.

Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage?

(A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and societal factors during any given historical period.

(B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920s and 1930s.

(C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years.

(D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year.

(E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other
months.

Can you please provide explanation for C ?
I guess conclusion is The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact.
Whats the meaning of this conclusion ?
And i guess C strangthens the conclusion instead of challenging it.
_________________

Press +1 Kudos if you find this Post helpful

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 175

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 328

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 15

Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
Re: *700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 May 2015, 23:58
Kindly help us to understand logic behind Option C

Failed to understand why are we comparing results from previous years as stimulus talks about year 1929

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 15

Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 205

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 642

*700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2015, 08:23
King407 wrote:
souvik101990 wrote:
The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher.

Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage?

(A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and societal factors during any given historical period.

(B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920s and 1930s.

(C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years.

(D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year.

(E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other
months.

C indicates the hike in suicide rate in Oct Nov.

IMO, B has the same explanation...as option C has. If we go for negation...both statements have the same effect on the conclusion. Kindly clarify.
_________________

"Success is not as glamorous as people tell you. It's a lot of hours spent in the darkness."

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 642

Current Student
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 444

Kudos [?]: 229 [0], given: 39

Re: *700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 May 2015, 23:09
Hi,

Can somebody pls put the explanation for C?

C says that the suicide rate was higher than average in preceeding and following years... hence only this year is exception when the figures fell ....

Conclusion of the arguement:The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. means its not true.

C actually supports the conclusion rather than challenging it.

Regards,
Dom.

Kudos [?]: 229 [0], given: 39

Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 113

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 44

Location: United States
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: *700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 May 2015, 02:52
dominicraj wrote:
Hi,

Can somebody pls put the explanation for C?

C says that the suicide rate was higher than average in preceeding and following years... hence only this year is exception when the figures fell ....

Conclusion of the arguement:The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. means its not true.

C actually supports the conclusion rather than challenging it.

Regards,
Dom.

The argument says Suicide wave is legend, which means it is not true.

The premise on which the argument is concluded is based on research which compares the monthly figures which show the suicide rate is generally higher in October and November. But what option C adds a new dimension- Yearly figures.

What option C says is- even though the figures for Oct/Nov may be high when compared to other months, the figures for 1929 itself are more than the averages recorded for years that preceded and succeeded. So, the suicide wave did exist and is not a legend.

Hope that helps.

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 44

Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 113

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 44

Location: United States
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: *700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 May 2015, 02:55
akshdeep28 wrote:
King407 wrote:
souvik101990 wrote:
The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher.

Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage?

(A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and societal factors during any given historical period.

(B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920s and 1930s.

(C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years.

(D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year.

(E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other
months.

C indicates the hike in suicide rate in Oct Nov.

IMO, B has the same explanation...as option C has. If we go for negation...both statements have the same effect on the conclusion. Kindly clarify.

B and C are not same, B is inverse of C. So if you are negating properly, you should not get the same result.

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 44

Current Student
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 444

Kudos [?]: 229 [0], given: 39

Re: *700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 May 2015, 03:06
anilisanil wrote:
dominicraj wrote:
Hi,

Can somebody pls put the explanation for C?

C says that the suicide rate was higher than average in preceeding and following years... hence only this year is exception when the figures fell ....

Conclusion of the arguement:The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. means its not true.

C actually supports the conclusion rather than challenging it.

Regards,
Dom.

The argument says Suicide wave is legend, which means it is not true.

The premise on which the argument is concluded is based on research which compares the monthly figures which show the suicide rate is generally higher in October and November. But what option C adds a new dimension- Yearly figures.

What option C says is- even though the figures for Oct/Nov may be high when compared to other months, the figures for 1929 itself are more than the averages recorded for years that preceded and succeeded. So, the suicide wave did exist and is not a legend.

Hope that helps.

Hi anil,

The option C is not talking about the YOY values of suicide for all 12 months but the average value of Oct and Nov alone YOY.

It does not tell anything to refute or go against the fact that in the year 1929 the suicides in other months were substantially higher...

"only three other months were the monthly figures lower"

"During the summer months,.. the number of suicides was substantially higher"

Both of the above mentioned suggest that the whole year had many months with more suicides. Then how does C help to counter..ie. suggest that the suicides in Oct 1929 are due to suicide wave?

Regars,
Dom.

Kudos [?]: 229 [0], given: 39

Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 113

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 44

Location: United States
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: *700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 May 2015, 03:29
dominicraj wrote:
anilisanil wrote:
dominicraj wrote:
Hi,

Can somebody pls put the explanation for C?

C says that the suicide rate was higher than average in preceeding and following years... hence only this year is exception when the figures fell ....

Conclusion of the arguement:The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. means its not true.

C actually supports the conclusion rather than challenging it.

Regards,
Dom.

The argument says Suicide wave is legend, which means it is not true.

The premise on which the argument is concluded is based on research which compares the monthly figures which show the suicide rate is generally higher in October and November. But what option C adds a new dimension- Yearly figures.

What option C says is- even though the figures for Oct/Nov may be high when compared to other months, the figures for 1929 itself are more than the averages recorded for years that preceded and succeeded. So, the suicide wave did exist and is not a legend.

Hope that helps.

Hi anil,

The option C is not talking about the YOY values of suicide for all 12 months but the average value of Oct and Nov alone YOY.

It does not tell anything to refute or go against the fact that in the year 1929 the suicides in other months were substantially higher...

"only three other months were the monthly figures lower"

"During the summer months,.. the number of suicides was substantially higher"

Both of the above mentioned suggest that the whole year had many months with more suicides. Then how does C help to counter..ie. suggest that the suicides in Oct 1929 are due to suicide wave?

Regars,
Dom.

First let us understand the question-

October 1929 stock market crash caused a suicide wave- This is the statement the questions contends.

The argument is that- hey there have been suicides all through the year, in fact during the summer when the stock market was flourishing the suicide rate was even more. So the suicides existed even other wise and the stock market crash did not cause it.

How do we challenge this?

If we keenly look, the stock market crashed in October. So what happened before should not ideally matter. Also, if we prove that what happened during October, November of 1929 added to the existing trends of suicide, it would challenge the argument, no?

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 44

Re: *700* The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock   [#permalink] 30 May 2015, 03:29

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
39 Spending on research and development by United States 21 12 Jun 2016, 02:54
12 In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in 16 17 Jul 2016, 02:36
7 A conservation group in the United States is trying to 34 16 Jul 2017, 04:32
2 In developed countries, such as the United States, the 7 12 Mar 2017, 18:05
12 A wave of unusual violence, from murder to suicide, plagued 13 30 Jan 2016, 08:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by