It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 02:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 368

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix AZ
The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 12:45
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

13% (00:19) correct 88% (00:25) wrong based on 10 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but the nation to which it is responsible.

(A) but the nation to which it is responsible
(B) but for the sake of the nation to which it is responsible
(C) so much as the nation it is responsible to
(D) as the nation it is responsible to
(E) but the nation

Key idea that i remembered and tried to apply = possessive poison.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 398

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 13:12
B seems correct here...

is not for the sake of the court but for the sake of the nation to which it is responsible

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 18:40
I will go with E and ellipsis

The Supreme Courtâ€™s concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but [for the sake of] the nation

B looks good except for "IT"... what is it referring to??? sake or concern?

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 368

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix AZ

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 18:44
u2lover wrote:
I will go with E and ellipsis

The Supreme Courtâ€™s concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but [for the sake of] the nation

B looks good except for "IT"... what is it referring to??? sake or concern?

That is exactly what i thought. However, the answer is B.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 18:55
u2lover, I think it should be (B) only.
Pattern : not for X but for Y is idiomatic.
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 19:27
u2lover wrote:
I will go with E and ellipsis

The Supreme Courtâ€™s concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but [for the sake of] the nation

B looks good except for "IT"... what is it referring to??? sake or concern?

"it" is referring to court. Try putting "sake" or "concern" in place of "it" and sentence doesn't make sense.

It must be B.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2006, 02:27
Not for the sake of X but for the sake of Y~ idiomatic

Can`t use ellipsis here, unless the sentence were stated as follows:

The Supreme Courtâ€™s concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but for the sake of the nation.

(B)

:45

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2006, 23:34
Will go with B too.

IMO ellipis doesnot apply here.

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 368

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix AZ

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2006, 23:56
jaynayak wrote:
Will go with B too.

IMO ellipis doesnot apply here.

What is ellipis?

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 523

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2006, 00:22
B for parallel construction.

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2756

Kudos [?]: 1912 [0], given: 235

Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2010, 01:35
ps_dahiya wrote:
u2lover wrote:
I will go with E and ellipsis

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but [for the sake of] the nation

B looks good except for "IT"... what is it referring to??? sake or concern?

"it" is referring to court. Try putting "sake" or "concern" in place of "it" and sentence doesn't make sense.

It must be B.

IMO It can not refer to supreme court's concern, as the subject is not supreme court but supreme court's concern.
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Kudos [?]: 1912 [0], given: 235

Retired Moderator
Status: I wish!
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 784

Kudos [?]: 484 [0], given: 33

Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2010, 03:33
IMO "IT" has proper antecedent, Trying using other possible antecedent and check the sentence whether sentence makes sense. "IT" can't refer back to the other possible antecedents such as Sake, Nation or Concern.

Yes, for more detail check "Supernova" example given by MGMAT on page no. 70 (ed-4th)

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but FOR the nation to which it is responsible.

Also, this question is taken from http://www.stjohns.edu/media/3/f8f413fd ... d15f19.pdf
_________________

http://drambedkarbooks.com/

Kudos [?]: 484 [0], given: 33

CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2756

Kudos [?]: 1912 [0], given: 235

Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2010, 03:43
In the Mgmat guide it is supernovas not supernova's. Thus it is not relevant.
Check my previous post:
It can not refer to supreme court's concern, as the subject is not supreme court but supreme court's concern.

Suppose you have 3 contenders for 'IT' and one of the contender is Apostrophe, but other 2 does not make sense. Can you conclude the Apostrophe is right?

Moreover my concern is not whether others make sense or not, but whether supreme court's concern could be used as antecedent for it?

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but for the sake of the nation to which supreme court's concern is responsible

I have replaced IT by supreme court's concern. Does this make sense?

I think the following is correct but it was not given in the answer choices.

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but for the sake of the nation to which supreme court is responsible
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Kudos [?]: 1912 [0], given: 235

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 966 [0], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2011, 06:07
this is an example of BAD question in 1000 series.
Avoid it, since it does not teaches you.
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 966 [0], given: 621

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4315

Kudos [?]: 8192 [1], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2011, 07:09
1
KUDOS
Look at the following; This one is from Manhattan’s Ron;

“'m pleased to announce that we are strongly considering eliminating altogether the coverage of "possessive poison" in the next forthcoming edition of our strategy guide.
while this rule has been mentioned in the answer keys to one or two official problems, it has never been dispositive in even a single problem, and it has caused confusion vastly outdoing its usefulness for a great number of students”

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/pro ... t9533.html

I think we can ignore the possessiveness of an antecedent as long as it is referring only to that particular referent. We might rather look at other issues
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8192 [1], given: 364

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1628

Kudos [?]: 1125 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2011, 09:51
+1 B

It requires parallelism:
not FOR...but FOR...
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1125 [0], given: 109

Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 38

Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2011, 11:03
Thanks Daagh, but "possessive poison" helps in elimination of wrong answer choices.
_________________

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MGMAT 6 650 (51,31) on 31/8/11
MGMAT 1 670 (48,33) on 04/9/11
MGMAT 2 670 (47,34) on 07/9/11
MGMAT 3 680 (47,35) on 18/9/11
GMAT Prep1 680 ( 50, 31) on 10/11/11

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CR notes
http://gmatclub.com/forum/massive-collection-of-verbal-questions-sc-rc-and-cr-106195.html#p832142
http://gmatclub.com/forum/1001-ds-questions-file-106193.html#p832133
http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-critical-reasoning-collection-106783.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html?hilit=chineseburned

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 38

Re: sc -- supreme court   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2011, 11:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.