It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 15:46

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Olin (St. Louis) R1 | Tuck R1 | Ross R1 | Fuqua R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The table below gives three factors to be considered when

Author Message
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 921

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

The table below gives three factors to be considered when [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2006, 15:28
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

The table below gives three factors to be considered when choosing a mate and the percent of the 1200 respondents to a survey who cited that factor as important. If 30% of the respondents cited both "attractiveness" and "personality", what is the maximum possible number of respondents who cited "power" but niether "attractiveness" nor "personality"?

Factor-------------Percent of Respondents
1)Attractiveness------56%
2)Personality----------48%
3)Power---------------42%

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 922

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2006, 17:01
26%?

I would draw a venn diagram for this..

Attractiveness and Personality: 30 %
To have max power and no attra,no personality, we need 0 for the follwoing cases:
Attr,Perso and power = 0
Attr,Power = 0
Pers,Power = 0
i.e Attr alone is 30
Persona alone is 18
Which leaves us with Power alone: 100 -( 30 + 26 + 18)

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: Chennai,India

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2006, 11:22
willget800 wrote:
26%?

I would draw a venn diagram for this..

Attractiveness and Personality: 30 %
To have max power and no attra,no personality, we need 0 for the follwoing cases:
Attr,Perso and power = 0
Attr,Power = 0
Pers,Power = 0
i.e Attr alone is 30
Persona alone is 18
Which leaves us with Power alone: 100 -( 30 + 26 + 18)

u r doing a grt job.. but can u be more clear.. i am not able to follow it! pls!
_________________

vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1057

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2006, 12:15
raz,

Please see the attached Venn diagram.

Given both Attr and Personality is 30% (this could include all three also)

Total = 42+56+48 = 156
The additional 56 should belong to X, Y, Z, 30-X

To the maximum value of Power (alone), we should take:

X = Y = Z = 0

Then

Attractiveness alone = 56% - 30% = 26%
Personality alone = 48%-30% = 18%
Power and Attr = 30%

Power alone = 100 - (18+26+30) = 26%

26% of 1200.
Attachments

Venn.doc [25 KiB]

_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

05 Feb 2006, 12:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The table below gives three factors to be considered when

Moderator: chetan2u

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.